Categories
News/Blog

Proposed changes to Alberta’s animal protection laws leave “sport” animals vulnerable 

Cover image: Calgary Stampede chuckwagon races. Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals Media.

  • Alberta is proposing its first major update to animal protection laws in more than 20 years.  
  • The changes signal a growing recognition that stronger protections are needed to prevent animal suffering and hold offenders accountable. 
  • While some proposed changes in the Animal Protection Amendment Act (Bill 22) include meaningful improvements to be celebrated, animals used in sporting events, such as rodeos, are left vulnerable. 

Alberta residents: Learn more below, then email your MLA and Alberta Minister of Agriculture, Minister RJ Sigurdson (AGRIC.Minister@gov.ab.ca), to express your concern and seek stronger protections for animals used in sporting activities.

Find my MLA
Email Minister Sigurdson
Learn more
Tips for your email

Current laws & proposed changes

Under the existing Animal Protection Act in Alberta, which has had no major updates in more than 20 years, it is illegal to cause an animal to be in distress, with exemptions for some animal use industries. 

Now, Alberta is proposing a major update. This signals important progress—but one of the proposed changes would allow distress resulting from the use of animals in a sporting activity that is carried out in accordance with “reasonable and generally accepted practices”, expanding the types of industries exempted. 

This concerning change could allow sporting industries that use animals to effectively make their own rules and allow harmful practices that cause significant suffering, such as in rodeo events. 

This change may also make it harder to hold people accountable or enforce rules while setting a risky example that other jurisdictions might follow. Removing the proposed exemption for allowing distress in sporting activities is a critical step toward ensuring animals are protected. 

If you are a resident of Alberta, or have friends and family who are residents, share this information and contact your MLA and the Minister of Agriculture, who is sponsoring the Bill, to request changes to better protect animals. The legislation is moving quickly! Don’t hesitate to speak up for animals. 

A persistent loophole

Vague language, like “reasonable and generally accepted practices” often allows industries to set their own standards when no external standards exist, even when those practices may cause harm. It may also limit enforcement action when there are no clear guidelines on what a generally accepted practice is.  

Animals used in sporting activities should not be subjected to distress or cruel practices for entertainment. Closing this loophole by removing the exemption for causing distress in sporting activities is a critical step toward ensuring animals are protected.  

Limited public input

While the province consulted with a range of stakeholders, including industry representatives and enforcement agencies, there was no formal public comment period for the Animal Protection Amendment Act (Bill 22). This has left many concerned individuals in a rush to contact their MLAs to request amendments before the bill progresses further. 

The legislation is still in early stages, and there remains an opportunity to strengthen protections for animals. However, the timeline for public input is unclear, and the process appears to be moving quickly. 

Don’t hesitate! Contact your MLA and Minister Sigurdson and express your concerns before the legislation progresses and amendments can no longer be made.  

Find my MLA
Email Minister Sigurdson

Tips for requesting amendments by email

To request amendments to the Animal Protection Amendment Act (Bill 22), consider: 

  • Raising concern about vague exemptions like “reasonable and generally accepted practices” that can result in significant animal suffering.
  • Requesting the removal of the proposed distress exemptions for animals used in sporting activities. 
  • Calling for clear, enforceable protections that address the risks associated with rodeo and other animal-based sporting activities. 
    • For example, prohibiting the most dangerous and inhumane rodeo events, handling practices, and tools that cause animal suffering.

As the bill moves forward, decision-makers have an opportunity to build on these improvements and deliver legislation that fully reflects the public’s expectation for strong, enforceable animal protection laws. 

By contacting your MLA or encouraging friends or family who are Alberta residents to do so, you are taking direct action to strengthen protections for animals.  

Categories
News/Blog

Podcast: Animal advocacy and Vancouver Humane Society’s mission (Vegan Boss Radio)

All episodes

The Vancouver Humane Society’s Chantelle Archambault sat down with Shawna Barker from the Vegan Boss Radio podcast about Vancouver Humane Society’s mission, work, and some practical ways that animal allies can make a difference.

Note: This written discussion has been edited for length.

Advocacy and justice for animals

A long-haired Highland cow stands in a grassy field, gently nuzzling a small calf beside her.

Shawna: Hi everyone. Welcome to Vegan Boss Radio. I am your host, Shawna Barker, and I’m so glad you’re here today. Today’s episode is a very important one because we’re talking about animal advocacy, public awareness, and how real change actually happens, not just online, but at the policy and community level.

Today I’m joined by Chantelle Archambault, who has worked as the communications director at the Vancouver Humane Society since 2021. She is deeply passionate about justice for all, both humans and animals, and has spent her career working with nonprofit organizations focused on family services, social justice, advocacy, and creating safer spaces for marginalized communities.

Chantelle’s lifelong commitment to the ethical treatment of animals inspired her to volunteer with the Toronto Humane Society and eventually move across Canada to take on her current role at Vancouver Humane Society. She has appeared in media outlets, including the CBC, CTV, CityNews, and the Daily Hive.

In this conversation, we talk about the work that the Vancouver Humane Society does behind the scenes, including its past and current campaigns, how they raise public awareness around practices like rodeos and horse racing, and why these issues are often misunderstood or even normalized, in many cases.

Chantelle, thank you so much for being here today. I’m wondering what drew you to animal advocacy, and then how did that lead you to working with the Vancouver Humane Society?

Chantelle: Thanks so much for having me today. It’s interesting to be on this side of the question because I love asking this to our guests on the Vancouver Humane Society podcast, Informed Animal Ally, as well. I got into animal advocacy the way that I found a lot of people I speak with do as well. I’ve always been drawn to animals since I was a kid, making my dad wait before he drove to work on rainy days so I could pick up every single worm off the driveway so they wouldn’t get squished. I was putting the spiders out through the window in the classrooms so the other kids wouldn’t step on them.

When I was in university, I volunteered doing feline enrichment at the Toronto Humane Society. I worked at an organization that worked with marginalized communities affected by HIV and then at a Children’s and family organization. Those were both organizations that aligned with my values.

I care about justice for humans for all of the same reasons I care about justice for animals. But I always knew that my dream job would be to work in the animal sector doing communications, telling those stories from the animals because their voices are ignored so often.

Shawna: That’s so incredible. It sounds like it was very much meant to be. Maybe for listeners that are not familiar with the Vancouver Humane Society, could you share a little bit about the mission and the types of work that you do?

Chantelle: Yeah, absolutely. So, the Vancouver Humane Society’s mission is to expose and end animal suffering and exploitation, including supporting individuals, organizations, and governments in caring for the wellbeing of animals. So, we work in five main areas to do that.

There are already a lot of great rescues who do work in taking in pets who really need it. So, our goal is to support the guardians of animals who are loved, but just need some help to keep them cared for at home and out of the shelter rescue system. We offer emergency veterinary support for low-income guardians so that they can get their pets cared for and back home safe rather than having to watch their pets suffer or make the really difficult decision to either euthanize them or give them up to get the care they need. We do a lot of advocacy work around animals in captivity, zoos, aquariums, mobile petting zoos, exotic pets, and animals in entertainment. That includes things like rodeos, horse carriages, horse racing, and wildlife.

Recently, we’ve taken more of a support role on this one for other organizations that focus on wild animals like the fur bearers. But we’ve covered things like, wildlife culls, hunting and fishing, regulations for farming, rodent poisons, and then farmed animals. That is a major area because, I’m sure you know, farmed animal welfare is often considered the greatest animal welfare issue on the planet.

We work in plant-based advocacy to make plant-based eating more accessible and reduce the demand for animals to be farmed for food. And we also advocate for better policies and practices that address the worst harms animals face while they’re currently in the farming system.

Rodeos and horse racing

Three jockeys lean forward as their horses gallop closely together during a horse race.

Shawna: I was scrolling one of the Facebook groups for the Hastings Sunrise neighbourhood and I saw a petition to bring back Hastings horse racing track. How do people not see how much cruelty is involved there? What do you wish more people knew about those industries?

Chantelle: Yeah. There are so many misconceptions about those two industries, and what a lot of it comes down to is lack of choice. The main argument from those industries and their supporters is that those animals love their jobs, but animals aren’t like human athletes because they don’t have a choice.

Animals used in rodeo do the behaviours that rodeo announcers pass off as performing are actually natural fear responses. A racehorse isn’t like a human athlete who gets to go home and do what they want. At the end of the day, their whole life and full routine is controlled by their handlers who decide when they train, when they rest, when and if they get time to run free. Animals also don’t choose to get into those situations. They’re bred for those industries, and if they don’t do what they’re expected, they’re punished for it.

For rodeo and horse racing, we actually did an entire podcast episode just on this topic called Eight Arguments in Support of Rodeo and How to Respond, because there are so many, and we’ve run into them all the time.

For horse racing, the most common argument is that if we take away horse racing, those horses will have nowhere to go and they’ll be sent to slaughter. First of all, this shouldn’t be true anyway. Horses are only able to race for a fraction of their lives because it’s quite hard on their bodies. So, any responsible industry should have a retirement plan in place.

The best outcome is one where horses can spend their days as freely as possible, like in a sanctuary or being therapy horses. We advocated for the BC government to support that transition when Hastings racecourse in Vancouver closed down, as you mentioned. And the other side of that coin is that while the industry is arguing that we have to keep horse racing around, because there are so many racehorses who would have nowhere to go, they have still been breeding more animals into this industry.

Shawna: Have there been campaigns to stop the horse carriage rides in Victoria?

Chantelle: We have worked around the horse carriage rides in Victoria a little bit. Right now, we’re working on a horse carriage campaign in Vancouver. We’re trying to get horse carriages off of busy city streets.

Education for long-term change

An overhead view of a wooden table set with colorful plant-based dishes.

Shawna: Beyond the individual campaigns that VHS works on, are there examples of maybe systems-level work, maybe through getting policies changed, education or outreach to address long-term changes that will benefit animals?

Chantelle: Yeah, absolutely. Education is a really important part of the work we do because the only way we can make change for animals is if people know what the issues are and care enough to help make those changes.

One project I am really excited to share is our plant university program. We originally launched Plant University in 2022 as a home for our ongoing work making plant-based eating more accessible to individuals through personal education, like sharing recipes and also working with institutions.

To improve access to plant-based foods for instance, in the past we’ve worked with school cafeterias to help organize meatless Mondays, and that work has carried on over the past few years. We’ve developed a recipe library and shared reasons and tips to eat more plant-based foods with people all over Canada.

And we’ve also been working with businesses and institutions like long-term care homes more locally to help them transition part of their menus. We’ve also supported change at the government level. A couple years ago, we created a report for the City of Vancouver on how transitioning a percentage of the food they purchased to plant-based could save them money and help meet their environmental goals.

This last year, we transitioned the program to specifically target post-secondary students in the Lower Mainland. A lot of students are making food purchasing decisions on their own for the first time in their lives, and when we share all the benefits of choosing plant-based options along with tips for eating more plant-based foods like recipes and an on-campus food guide, there’s a much better chance we’ll see that translate into new habits these young folks will carry with them through the rest of their lives. So, we’ve been doing things like in-class presentations, outreach events, signage, and posters on campus.

Emotional toll of animal advocacy

A person wearing a cap and denim jacket gently embraces a dog.

Shawna: I know advocacy work can be really kind of emotionally heavy. I mean, you’re seeing and talking about like animals being mistreated all the time. Maybe for yourself or for your team, is there a way that you navigate feeling emotionally burnt out by doing this kind of work and how to stay motivated?

Chantelle: Yeah, it is really tough sometimes. We find different ways to share what’s happening through writing, but that means we need to watch the footage of what animals are going through behind the scenes at rodeos or in slaughterhouses. That does really get to you because you know that you can walk away from seeing this at the end of the day, but for so many animals, this is their whole lives.

I really try to ground myself by recognizing that I’m doing everything I can do to help. I’m doing advocacy, so fewer animals have to go through this. I am vegan, so I’m not directly contributing to animals going through what they go through in the farming system. And then I spend lots of time connecting with the world around me in different ways when I’m not working, talking to my loved ones, talking to my cat, taking my cat out into the backyard so she can live the best life that she can.

I know if I’m not able to take care of myself and reset, I’m not going to be as effective in actually doing this advocacy. So, taking time for ourselves is part of being a good animal advocate.

The role of public awareness

Close-up of a horse’s face, showing its eyes.

Shawna: You mentioned kind of the role that public awareness plays. Do you feel that the public awareness does play a huge role in actually like changing the laws in these practices?

Chantelle: Yeah, absolutely. Public awareness is huge. We live in a world where companies, for the most part, are going to do what’s most profitable. Governments, for the most part, are going to do what gets them re-elected.

So, when we raise public awareness, people change their behaviours and they speak up and it tells those leaders of companies and governments that compassion is the popular choice, that’s going to be more profitable or it’s going to get more people on their side before the next election. When we do see government representatives connect with an issue on a personal level, it’s often because they’ve heard from individuals in their community, not necessarily from someone who’s representing an organization.

Shawna: For increasing public awareness, what are the best strategies? Would you say on social media you have a good reach or is it door-to-door campaigns with petitions? I’m just wondering what is an effective way to get the word out?

Chantelle: I think there are so many different ways. If someone is individually doing this, I would say play to your strengths.

If you have an audience online, definitely online is a great way to reach people. If you’re out in your community and you’re connecting people one-on-one in groups, that’s a great way to reach people. If you’re at an event and you can bring like a plant-based dish, use that as an opener to talk about animal suffering in the farmed animal system. Like anything that you can do to get people talking and thinking, I think is a great way to educate people about the things animals go through. There are opportunities all the time, all around us.

Shawna: And then for Vancouver Humane Society specifically, are you reaching people in specific neighbourhoods directly or do you feel like a lot of the reach comes from posting videos and articles on social media?

Chantelle: The biggest two routes that we take are through our email list and organic social media posts.

There are people who are really deeply engaged and we have about 16,000 people on our email list. We send out things that they can share on social media, ways that they can take direct action, ways that they can speak up to their elected officials.

Shawna: Someone who maybe isn’t on your email list and deeply cares about animals but feels overwhelmed and is not sure where to start—what would you suggest as a way to support this work?

Chantelle: Yeah, I would say the most basic first step is to find an organization that really aligns with your values and subscribe to their email list.

We have so many quick actions, like emails to decision makers, petitions to sign, campaigns to share around. There are ways to get involved to varying degrees based on how much time you have to spend on advocacy work, from a ten second click to a more in-depth collaborative piece.

In a more general sense, I would advise people to get to know your government representatives at the local, provincial, and federal levels. Your city council members, your members of Legislative Assembly, your members of parliament.

Once you make a connection with them, you’re in a much better position to let them know that you care about animals or what you care about in general when a policy decision comes up that they’re involved with. You don’t need to be an expert, it can really just be about going to them and saying, hey, I care about animals, we are a community that loves animals. I really hope you’ll vote for better animal welfare when the opportunity comes up.

Shawna: And if someone wants to engage with anything that VHS is working on and but they don’t live in Vancouver or even British Columbia, are there ways to get involved or do you suggest they find other local humane societies?

Chantelle: I definitely suggest you always find local organizations that you can make a difference locally on issues that are near you, and likely near and dear to your heart. But you absolutely don’t need to live in Vancouver to get involved with our campaigns. We cover a whole range of campaigns from local issues to issues of national importance. Most of our quick actions can be taken by anyone in Canada and sometimes beyond.

I’d recommend you go to our website, vancouverhumane.ca and sign up for our email list to get all the updates. You can also follow us at Vancouver Humane Society on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, or Blue Sky. Any of those ways is going to be a great first route to get involved.

Shawna: Okay. Amazing. Well, Chantelle, I want to thank you so much for sharing everything that Vancouver Humane Society is working on, and ways for people to get involved. I know you really are emphasizing people getting involved with their local officials and I think that is such an important way to help shed light and address some of the injustices going on towards animals in your community. Did you have any final thoughts or anything you wanted to share with our listeners?

Chantelle: I just wanted to thank you so much for having me on today and giving me the opportunity to share about this. I think this is a great podcast and it was a really great conversation and I am glad that we had the chance to talk today.

Categories
News/Blog

Progress for renters with pets in Quebec

Quebec’s housing tribunal rules no-pet clause in rental lease violates Charter rights | CBC News

A recent ruling by Quebec’s housing tribunal has found the no-pet clause of a rental lease to be in violation of the province’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.

Renters in Quebec have stronger grounds to challenge no-pet clauses in leases, marking important progress for those who are denied housing simply because they share their homes with companion animals.

“A recent ruling by Quebec’s housing tribunal has found a rental lease’s no-pet clause to be in violation of the province’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, marking a significant advancement in the protection of tenants’ rights when it comes to the issue of pets.”

“This is the first time the no-pet clause has been challenged based on Quebec Charter rights, specifically articles 1 and 5 that pertain to privacy and the right to personal freedom.”

Advocacy for renters with pets

The Montreal SPCA has been fighting to ban no-pet clauses in rental housing for more than a decade.

“More than half of Quebec families now include a pet, according to the SPCA, and challenges with finding housing that allows pets is one of the main reasons animals are surrendered to local shelters.”

By separating animals from the guardians who love them, no-pet clauses cause harm to both humans and animals. They also disproportionately impact individuals living on a lower income, who are far more likely to rent rather than own their homes. An end to these clauses would be a huge win for animal well-being and equity.

What does this mean for current clauses?

“The tribunal’s decision does not automatically invalidate all no-pet clauses across Quebec. However, … this case sets a precedent and means these clauses can now be challenged on these grounds.”

Where B.C. stands on no-pet clauses

Ontario is currently the only province in Canada where no-pet clauses are officially banned. The clauses are still allowed in British Columbia.

Last year, Vancouver City Council voted to push for more pet-friendly housing by asking the Province to eliminate no-pet clauses, and reviewing local housing policies to make sure renters aren’t punished for having a companion animal. The VHS’s Executive Director, Amy Morris, spoke in support of the motion before it was passed.

Read article
Categories
News/Blog

Honouring Ingrid Pollak: Founder of the Vancouver Humane Society 

We are saddened to share the news of the passing of Ingrid Pollak, founder of the Vancouver Humane Society. Ingrid was a courageous advocate and a powerful voice for animals for decades. We are honoured to share this tribute to her life and her tireless efforts to protect animals and inspire others to do the same. 

Ingrid’s compassion for animals began early in life. Growing up in Germany, she once told friends about seeing flies trapped on flypaper and climbing onto a chair as a child to try to rescue them. That instinct to protect vulnerable animals never left her.

VHS Board members 1993 (Ingrid Pollak, top left)

Her public advocacy began in Vancouver around 1981, when she worked on issues related to stray cat overpopulation and the need for spay and neuter programs. In the late 1980s, she was elected to the board of the Vancouver branch of the BC SPCA, where she advocated for reforms to policies around adoption and the euthanasia of homeless animals. Frustrated with the pace of change, Ingrid left the SPCA and brought together other animal advocates to form the Vancouver Humane Alert Society in 1984, which later became the Vancouver Humane Society (VHS). She once described the organization to the media as “like a union for animals. When animals come into conflict with people, we always side with the animals.” 

Ingrid quickly became a driving force for animal protection in Vancouver. She led the campaign to close the Stanley Park Zoo in the 1990s, using creative and attention grabbing strategies to raise public awareness. One of her most memorable actions involved driving around Vancouver in a pickup truck with a stuffed bear inside a large metal cage in the truck bed while distributing leaflets about the plight of captive animals. In 1993, Vancouver voters chose by a 54 percent majority to close the zoo after a campaign rooted in the belief that wild animals should not be kept primarily for public entertainment. 

She was fearless in confronting cruelty wherever it occurred. In 2012, Ingrid attempted to obtain a legal injunction to save the life of Sniffy the rat when an “artist” threatened to kill the animal in front of an art gallery audience. Circuses and rodeos were also major targets of her advocacy, particularly the Cloverdale Rodeo. Ingrid helped spark the movement that ultimately led to circuses with performing exotic animals being prohibited in most areas of British Columbia. When the Shrine Circus attempted to evade Vancouver’s 1992 bylaw banning exotic animal performances by keeping tigers and bears in transport trucks because they were not technically “performing,” Ingrid exposed the situation by marching up to the trucks with media present and opening the doors. 

Nola Frost, Ingrid Pollak and Annelise Sorg

Her advocacy extended to many other issues. She helped local media uncover that the Vancouver Game Farm (now the Greater Vancouver Zoo) was allowing deer to breed and then shooting the offspring when there were too many animals. From challenging turtle races and the hunting of exhausted migratory birds, to speaking out about the suffering of animals on factory farms and responding to calls about abandoned litters of kittens, Ingrid confronted cruelty wherever she found it, even when it involved powerful institutions.

Ingrid also travelled widely to share knowledge and learn from other advocates, attending animal protection conferences across the United States and Eastern Canada. She collaborated with organizations across North America and beyond, freely sharing resources and working together to advance protections for animals. 

“I don’t love animals, I respect them. They are our cousins. They have blood, nerves, a brain. We don’t always understand them and they don’t always understand us, but we are related. People assume I must ‘love’ animals, but no, I respect them.” -Ingrid Pollak, shared with the VHS fundraising team

Ingrid Pollak was a formidable force for animals, and the Vancouver Humane Society stands as part of her enduring legacy.

Ingrid Pollak & Mary Auerbach 1999

Continuing Ingrid’s legacy

The work Ingrid began more than four decades ago continues today through advocacy, education, and direct support for animals and the people who care for them. One meaningful way supporters can help ensure that this work continues long into the future is through legacy giving. 

By leaving a gift in your will to the Vancouver Humane Society, you can help carry forward Ingrid’s vision of a kinder world for animals. A bequest allows future generations to benefit from the advocacy and programs that protect animals from cruelty and create lasting change. Legacy gifts help ensure that the work Ingrid started many years ago will continue for many years to come. 

We are deeply grateful to everyone who honours Ingrid’s memory by supporting animals and the mission she helped build. 

To find out more about leaving a gift in your will to help animals, visithttps://vancouverhumanesociety.bc.ca/leave-a-legacy or call 604-266-1012.  

To make a donation in Ingrid’s memory visithttps://vancouverhumanesociety.bc.ca/donate-in-memory-and-in-honour/

Categories
News/Blog

Terrified animals are used as TV props in Fear Factor: House of Fear

Cover image: ‘Fear Factor: House of Fear.’ Photo by Serguei Bachlakov VIA RealityBlurred.com.

Rats are crowded in a clear container open at the top, surrounded a larger container of snakes.
FearFactorUS, YouTube.

Game show contestants are covered in bugs while pigeons fall on them from above.

They crawl past a snake holding a dead rat in their mouth by the tail.

They dig through the entrails of dead animals.

They roughly grab invertebrates by the handful.

They are suspended in the air, picking up rats dangerously by their tails, accidentally dropping them into snake pits, and flinging them into a “safety” enclosure.

It seems like the television of a bygone era; the kind of show we could expect to see sitting around our slightly boxier television sets of the early 2000s. But these challenges are all part of the currently airing Fear Factor: House of Fear. The new series, which was filmed in Metro Vancouver and credits local animal handlers, uses animals in a way that is deeply troubling.

Original post + actions
Media red flags list

Fear Factor: House of Fear makes a spectacle out of animal suffering

In one challenge, contestants are locked into a clear box and covered in insects. Either rats, pigeons, crested geckos, or ball pythons are dropped onto them from above, followed by plastic balls that the contestants must open to reveal a code and escape the enclosure.  

As the show title suggests, we see the contestants visibly afraid, fleeing out of the box as soon as they can, some still covered in animals. We see the animals falling and expressing signs of fear and stress: reptiles writhing after falling a considerable distance, rats defecating over each other and people; pigeons flapping their wings and smacking into the wall of the box. As a former pigeon researcher, I found the clearly agitated birds particularly difficult to watch, although all these species are sentient and capable of feeling pain and stress.  

‘Fear Factor: House of Fear.’

And then there are the things we don’t see. It is unclear how animals are housed above the enclosure or how long they may be left in containers before, during, and after filming. It’s also unclear how animals are removed from the contestants after they escape—whether a handler collects them, or the panicked contestants fling them off. 

And of course, unlike the human contestants, the animals did not choose to be put in frightening situations.

Because these species are often thought of as “pests” and “vermin”, the average viewer may not consider their perspective. Others may assume that because the animals were on television, their treatment on- and off-camera was humane. We may be so accustomed to seeing the “No animals were harmed” disclaimer at the end of tv and film productions that many might assume it’s a requirement. But is it? 

Does seeing animals on TV mean “no animals were harmed”?

“No animals were harmed during the making of this film” is a product of collaboration between filmmakers and the American Humane Society. The disclaimer is provided to productions involving animals that meet certain criteria.

These guidelines are not legally mandatory for all productions. They include things like discouraging the use of glass panes around birds, ensuring that multiple reptiles are accustomed to each other if they are in a scene together to protect their safety, and that all physical and emotional discomfort of any kind is to be strictly avoided. 

The disclaimer is notably absent from Fear Factor: House of Fear. The show does not appear on the American Humane Society’s current list of certified “No animals were harmed” productions

Moving past inhumane “entertainment”

The 2000s version of Fear Factor was born out of a different cultural atmosphere. Once-popular shows based on mockery like The Biggest LoserThe Swan, andTeen Mom are now often dissected for their concerning themes. As we progress culturally, we must continue to be critical of the media shown to us and advocate for better treatment of both animals and people.  

Unfortunately, because the actual events depicted in the currently airing Fear Factor: House of Fear revival show were filmed months ago, they cannot be prevented. However, we can do better in the future. By refusing to engage with media that harms animals, we can send a strong message to production companies that profiting off of fear and harm is no longer acceptable.  

The VHS and advocates are calling for change

The Vancouver Humane Society has reached out to all relevant decision-makers to call for accountability and protection for animals. These are:

  • The BC SPCA: The VHS has submitted a cruelty complaint to the BC SPCA, the only animal welfare organization in B.C. with the authority to investigate complaints of animal abuse or neglect under the provincial Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The BC SPCA is unable to comment on ongoing investigations. We will be sure to share any updates as soon as we are able.
  • Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC): The CBSC deals with complaints and questions from the public about the programming of private broadcasters in Canada. In response to our initial complaint, the VHS received an inadequate response from the shows Canadian broadcaster, Bell Media (CTV), and submitted a ruling request. We await a response to this request, which could take up to four months.
  • Bell Media (CTV): The VHS urged the show’s Canadian broadcaster to stop airing the program, which features improper and inhumane handling of animals.
  • Endemol Shine North America: The VHS also submitted a complaint to the production company of Fear Factor: House of Fear regarding the show’s treatment of animals.
  • B.C. Government: The VHS has contacted provincial decision-makers to call for greater protections for animals used in entertainment such as television productions filmed in the province.

Many supporters have also submitted additional complaints to these decision-makers.

Take action for animals
How to spot red flags in media

Share this post on:
Facebook | Instagram

A new Fear Factor: House of Fear special is set to air in May. For updates, including learning about additional actions as they come up, follow the VHS on social media, subscribe for email notifications, or check back on our website.

Categories
News/Blog

The campaign to regulate exotic animals in B.C. explained!

Share this post!

Many of us, or children in our lives, have passed snakes around classrooms, seen hedgehogs or tortoises sitting under bright lights at birthday parties, or seen lizards displayed in plastic containers at exotic pet expos. 

Across British Columbia, exotic animals are being transported to birthday parties, schools, fairs, and expo events through what are known as mobile live animal programs, or MLAPs. These programs are often marketed as educational and family friendly. But what do they really teach, and at what cost? 

There are growing calls, including from the VHS, other animal protection organizations, and the Union of B.C. Municipalities, for the B.C. government to regulate mobile live animal programs and update outdated exotic animal regulations using a science-based approach. 

Because these programs are often presented as educational or harmless, many people have questions about how they work and what impacts they may have on animals, public safety, and conservation.

Below are answers to some of the most common questions about mobile live animal programs and exotic animal regulations in B.C.

Read more
Tell the B.C. government to act!

What are mobile live animal programs?

MLAPs involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. This can include travelling petting zoos, classroom presentations, reptile expos, and events where exotic animals are sold. 

Many of the animals used in these programs are wild, exotic animals. By this, we mean that they are non-domesticated species native to countries outside Canada. Unlike dogs, cats, or horses, exotic animals have not been domesticated over thousands of years to live alongside people. Species like snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders retain their wild instincts, even if bred in captivity.

Are these programs really educational?

MLAPs are often defended as hands-on learning experiences that help children develop care for conservation or empathy for animals. However, research does not support the claim that interacting with live animals in these settings increases conservation knowledge or action.

Some research actually suggests that these experiences can result in negative emotional or intellectual perceptions of animals. Seeing animals removed from their natural environments, confined in small enclosures, and handled repeatedly can normalize the idea that wild animals exist for human use. 

Hands-on interactions can also increase the desire to own exotic animals, particularly among children. Rather than discouraging impulse purchases, close contact may unintentionally fuel demand. 

Researchers note that seeing animals up close is not necessary to foster learning, care, or conservation. Many beloved species, such as humpback whales, are widely protected without ever being held or handled by the public. 

Why don’t many exotic animals make good pets?

Exotic animals, whether captive bred or wild caught, have complex social, behavioural, dietary, and environmental needs. These needs are difficult to meet in captivity and even more difficult in private homes. 

When their needs are not met, animals may suffer chronic stress, illness, and premature death. It can also be challenging and costly to access specialized veterinary care. This can result in painful death, abandonment or surrender to already overburdened rescues. 

Even well-intentioned guardians may not have the expertise or resources required to properly care for exotic species. That is why the VHS supports a science-based “positive list” framework. This framework would outline species allowed to be kept as pets and would be based on welfare, health, safety, and environmental criteria.   

B.C.’s current Controlled Alien Species Regulations (CASR) are based on a lengthy and reactive “negative listing” approach, which lists 1000+ restricted and prohibited species. The current regulations also do not include animal welfare or disease risk as considerations for which animals are prohibited.    

What happens to animals during these events?

Exotic animals used in MLAPs face significant welfare risks, including stress from: 

  • Frequent travel to and from events, sometimes long distances 
  • Repeated public handling 
  • Undersized or barren enclosures during transport and display 
  • Inability to escape from public view or the view of other animals 
  • Exposure to unnatural lighting, temperature, humidity, noise, and smells

Research shows that many reptiles and other exotic animals hide signs of stress as a survival tactic. An animal that appears calm may still be experiencing chronic stress, which can have serious physical and psychological impacts. 

The Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries opposes public contact with wildlife, stating that pay-to-play activities are never in the best interest of the animal and can pose risks to both public safety and animal health. 

Why are animal enclosures at exotic animal events a concern?

Many exotic animals are sold across the province in barren, plastic take-out style containers with little to no enrichment, space, or opportunity to exhibit natural behaviours. It is often unclear how long animals remain in these containers throughout the duration of an event, which may last several hours or even multiple days. 

To justify this type of confinement, some organizations have referenced the International Air Transport Association’s Live Animals Regulations. These guidelines are designed to keep animals safe during air travel, where they may risk injury due to turbulence, and are intended to apply only during active transport. 

However, while travel to and from events may require temporary housing, displaying animals for sale or entertainment at an expo or event is not a period of active travel and does not pose the same safety risks as periods of active travel. Stress that animals experience in these housing environments far outweigh any potential benefits. 

Travel is often one of the most stressful events in any animal’s life, and all efforts should be made to minimize the need to transport animals, the duration of travel, and time spent in restrictive temporary housing.  

Unlike transportation guidelines, there are currently no consistent provincial standards in B.C. that regulate adequate animal handling or living spaces at mobile live animal events. Keeping animals in temporary, restrictive housing for entire days or weekends for the purpose of sale or public display can compromise animal welfare and increase stress and suffering. 

What about rescues?

Some MLAPs describe themselves as rescues that rely on events to raise funds for animal care. While funding challenges are real, reputable sanctuaries and rescues prioritize animal welfare above all else and successfully raise funds without putting animals at risk of stress and suffering. 

Grants, animal sponsorship programs, online peer-to-peer fundraising, corporate partnerships, and community events offer sustainable alternatives. Ethical rescues prioritize the long-term well-being of animals and do not use wild or exotic animals for public handling or entertainment. 

What changes are we calling for?

The VHS is urging the B.C. government to: 

  • Establish clear, enforceable regulations for mobile live animal programs that address animal welfare, environmental, public health and safety issues;  
  • Update and strengthen the CASR to prioritize animal welfare and public health considerations, alongside public safety, when determining which species can be kept, bred, and traded; 
  • Support a ban on keeping exotic species that cannot be humanely or safely kept. 

Peer-reviewed research, including recent analysis of reptile expos, supports stronger oversight and evidence-based regulations. A comprehensive approach must address both the sale of exotic animals and their use in public interaction programs. 

There are better ways to educate and inspire

We can foster compassion for animals without transporting them to and from parties and expos to be handled and put on display. Documentaries, virtual learning, sanctuary/rescue visits that prioritize animal well-being, and conservation programs all offer meaningful ways to engage the public. 

As public awareness grows, sentiment is shifting away from using live animals for entertainment and outreach. B.C. has an opportunity to lead with thoughtful, science-based policy that protects animals, public safety, and native ecosystems. 

If you believe wild, exotic animals deserve better protection, join us in calling on the provincial government to regulate mobile live animal programs and update B.C.’s exotic animal rules. 

Together, we can build a future where education and compassion never come at the expense of animal welfare. 

TAKE ACTION!
Add your name to the campaign

Ask the provincial government to take meaningful action on this issue by implementing the UBCM’s recommendations. 

Share this post!

Categories
News/Blog

UBC VegFest helps the next generation help animals

What if choosing lunch could help spare animals from suffering? On March 4, that hopeful vision came to life at the very first UBC VegFest!

The VHS’s PlantUniversity program partnered with the student club Vegans of UBC to showcase more than 25 local plant-based businesses and organizations right on campus. The event was hosted in collaboration with UBC’s student union, AMS, and supported by TMRW Foods, Vegan Supply, and SEEDS Sustainability Program.

Thousands of students and members of the surrounding community sampled delicious foods, met passionate vendors, and learned how plant-based choices can support their health, protect the environment, and reduce animal suffering in factory farms.

A basket next to plant-based items such as boxed mac and cheese, chocolate, loaves, and vegan tuna.
The winner of the UBC VegFest early bird draw showed off her gift basket, with items generously donated by Daiya, Oatworthy, Vegan Supply, To Live For, Gusta, Nuts For Cheese, and the Progressive Non-Animal Research Society.

Events like UBC VegFest are a powerful step toward a kinder food system. Outreach and education like this help to shape the values of future leaders and make compassionate choices more visible and accessible.

“Thank you so much for emphasizing education during the event just as much as yummy foods! I really appreciate this event. It is my favourite I’ve ever attended at UBC and I hope it becomes annual.” -Attendee of UBC VegFest

For young people making independent food choices for the first time, an open and welcoming community that shares the benefits of plant-based eating can help influence habits that last a lifetime.

One attendee called the experience “eye-opening to the options available to support a plant-based diet”.

Thank you to everyone who was involved in this event. Your advocacy helps to plant seeds of change that will grow for years to come.

For a list of organizers and vendors, visit the event page at PlantUniversity.ca.

Categories
News/Blog

More than 1,300 pets received life-saving care in 2025

CTV News story

Last year was incredibly challenging for many animal guardians across British Columbia. Rising costs left more people struggling to afford emergency veterinary care for the animals they love. At the same time, shelters and rescues were stretched beyond capacity.

For guardians with nowhere else to turn, the Vancouver Humane Society’s McVitie Fund was a vital lifeline.

In 2025, 1,372 animals received urgent, life-saving veterinary care through the McVitie Fund, nearly double the number helped the year before. Demand has grown dramatically, with more than eleven times as many applications compared to 2020.

Thanks to caring people like you, the program was able to remain open until mid-December and distribute a record-breaking $642,000 in emergency funds.

1,372

animals received life-saving veterinary care through the McVitie Fund in 2025

Your support makes stories like Rafiki’s possible.

After repeated attempts to treat painful urinary crystals, Rafiki needed emergency surgery. With help from the McVitie Fund, he received the care he needed and is now back home with his guardian, Sarah. “If it wasn’t for you, I don’t know what I would have done. Thank you so much!” Sarah told the VHS. “He’s my baby boy. He means everything to me.”

Rafiki at the vet
Rafiki back home safe

Every dollar makes a difference for families in need of urgent support. Can you donate today to help animals come home safe?

Categories
News/Blog

Endangered, exploited, and still imported.

Image credit: Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals 

  • Long-tailed macaques are the most heavily traded primate in the world for experimentation.  
  • Between 2023 and 2025, Canada allowed the import of more than 10,000 long-tailed macaques from Cambodia. 

TAKE ACTION: Sign the new federal e-petition, which aims to improve protections for long-tailed macaques in Canada. 

Sign the e-petition
Learn more

10,000 endangered long-tailed macaques, a species of monkey commonly traded for experimentation, were imported to Canada in just three years.

This is deeply concerning.

A five-year U.S. federal investigation found that Cambodia’s supply chain laundered wild-caught macaques as captive-bred animals. In November 2025, Thai authorities uncovered ongoing smuggling of wild macaques destined for Cambodia. These findings raise serious questions about the legality and traceability of animals entering international markets.

Canada has both the authority and the responsibility to act.

A barn owl sits tethered to the hand of their handler in Prague, Czechia. This owl is displayed in order to sell photoshoots with the captive bird. Prague, Czechia, 2021. Lukas Vincour / Zvirata Nejime / We Animals
Credit: Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals 

Your voice helps endangered monkeys

A new parliamentary e-petition calls on the Minister of the Environment, Climate Change and Nature to: 

  1. Launch an investigation into the legality, traceability, and authenticity of CITES permits used for importing Cambodian long-tailed macaques into Canada; and 
  1. Add long-tailed macaques to Schedule II of the Wild Animal and Plant Trade Regulations so Canada can require and assess its own import permits. 

This is a critical opportunity to strengthen oversight, uphold wildlife protection laws, and ensure Canada is not complicit in the exploitation of endangered animals. 

The petition closes the morning of April 28, 2026

If you are a Canadian citizen or resident, please add your name today and share the petition with others who care about wildlife protection and ethical responsibility. 

*Note: You will be asked to confirm your email after signing. Please check your spam folder to confirm your email and ensure your voice counts. 

Sign the e-petition

Together, we can urge the federal government to take meaningful action for long-tailed macaques before it is too late. 

Share our content to reach more people and spread the word!

Categories
News/Blog

George is home safe

When Hannah noticed that her beloved dog George had stopped eating and drinking and had developed a large, hard bump on his lip, she was terrified. Firm lumps that cause behaviour changes like this can be a sign of cancer.

George is a rescued dog from Mexico, found abandoned in a dumpster with his brothers as a puppy. Today, he is a 70-pound lap dog at heart who wants nothing more than to snuggle close to his mom. “He’s the most cuddly boy and always wanting to sleep with mom,” Hannah shared.

Living in a recovery house and doing her best to rebuild her life, Hannah was distraught when she realized she could not afford to have George examined. Hannah reached out to the McVitie Fund for help.  

Thanks to support from our wonderful community, George was able to see a veterinarian. He received an exam, medication for allergies, and antibiotics to treat the concerning bump. George is now on the road to recovery and back where he belongs, curled up beside Hannah. 

“Thank you so much for your help, I seriously appreciate it,” Hannah told the VHS’s McVitie team. She now looks forward to reaching a point in her life when she can give back to help other animals like George.

George’s recovery would not have been possible without the support of generous donors to the McVitie Fund. Could you make a small gift today to help us say yes to more beloved companion animals?