Categories
News/Blog

2026 Animal Welfare Election Guide

Use your voice to help animals this October with the VHS Animal Welfare Election Guide

The Vancouver Humane Society (VHS) is encouraging voters to bring animal welfare into conversations with candidates in the lead-up to the 2026 local elections across British Columbia. 

Use the VHS Animal Welfare Election Guide to engage with your candidates and discover what they will do to make our communities safer and more compassionate for animals.

Our approach is grounded in One Welfare; the understanding that the wellbeing of animals, people and the environment are interconnected.  

How it works

Read through the key welfare issues and examples of local action.

Send a short, respectful message using the template below.

Track responses and share what you discover with your community & VHS.

You can make animal welfare part of the conversation about the future of our communities

On October 17, 2026, voters across B.C. will head to the polls to elect mayors, councillors, regional representatives and school trustees.

While local elections may focus on issues like housing, transportation, parks, and community safety, there is another important issue that deserves a place on the ballot: animal welfare.

Across B.C., many local governments have already taken action on animal welfare issues. 

Some communities have introduced bylaws addressing animals used in entertainment, such as banning mobile live animal programs or rodeos, or have adopted policies that better protect companion animals, such as pet-friendly housing.

That means voters have an important opportunity to ask:
What will you do to make our communities safer and more compassionate for animals?

Get election resources & updates delivered to your inbox!

1. Key animal welfare issues

Local governments make decisions every day that impact animals and the people who care about them. From bylaws regulating the use of animals in entertainment and pet ownership, to pet-friendly housing policies, parks management and local business regulations.

Some issues are especially relevant across B.C., while others have a particular connection to specific communities.

Choose an issue to see what local governments can do and questions you can ask your candidates.

Support a shift away from factory farming, toward a more plant-based food system with stronger protections for farmed animals

thousands of chickens next to images of wildfire and flood water
What local governments can do

Local governments can help create healthier, more sustainable communities through policies that support plant-based food choices, stronger emergency planning and disaster response for farmed animals, and a transition away from intensive factory farming toward more diverse, sustainable, and locally focused agriculture.

Similarly, school board trustees can support school district policies and practices that prioritize plant-based food access in schools.

Examples of local action
Food procurement & events

The City of Vancouver and the District of North Vancouver have incorporated plant-based food procurement policies.

Emergency planning

The Squamish-Lillooet Regional District has adopted a comprehensive Agriculture Emergency Plan that includes a Commercial Livestock Relocation Guide and emergency support protocols.  

Want to strengthen your message? Copy one of the examples above to show your candidate what other local governments are already doing.

Questions to ask candidates

Use or adapt these questions to start the conversation with candidates at the local government and school trustee level:

Would you support practices, plans, and policies that increase the availability of sustainable plant-based foods, while reducing reliance on products from intensive animal agriculture?
Would you advocate to the provincial and federal governments for policies and investments that facilitate a transition toward healthy, humane, and sustainable plant-based food systems and away from intensive animal agriculture

—and, if so, what specific measures would you support?
Would you support updating local emergency and disaster plans to make sure farmed animals are included and plans are required for their evacuation, shelter, and care?
Share about this issue
A shareable graphic for social media that says "I'm speaking up for farmed animals & a more sustainable food system" with a picture of sheep eating grass.
To download: right click + save image as
"This election, I’m asking candidates what they will do to support policies that help protect farmed animals and make plant-based choices more accessible in our communities."

Support a shift away from entertainment that puts animals at risk toward humane, animal-free alternatives

A group of animal activists protesting outside of the Calgary Stampede asking for kinder events for animals.
What local governments can do

Animals should not be put at risk or subjected to fear, stress or suffering for entertainment. Local governments can take meaningful action towards protecting animals by prohibiting harmful events or activities at the community level.

Rodeos

Determine whether inhumane rodeo events or activities, such as roping, wrestling, and bucking events, are allowed to operate within the community or are supported financially through local policies and programs.

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs)

Determine whether MLAPs, such as exotic pet expos, travelling petting zoos, animal displays, and presentations, are allowed to operate. MLAPs increase the risks of zoonotic disease spread, cause animals unnecessary stress and risk of injury, and can contribute to environmental concerns if an exotic animal escapes.

Horse racing

Prohibit horse racing in communities where the horse racing industry is trying to revive the sport, particularly in Vancouver, the Lower Mainland, the Fraser Valley, and Osoyoos.

Horse carriages

Prohibit the operation of horse carriages on busy, urban streets in communities where carriage rides operate, particularly in Victoria and Vancouver.

Examples of local action​

Animals in entertainment

The City of Vancouver, the District of North Vancouver, and Port Moody have all prohibited rodeo activities.

Exotic animals

Castlegar introduced bylaws and licensing tools using a positive list of animals to regulate which are allowed to be kept in the community and under what circumstance.

Mobile live animal programs

Port Moody passed a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.

Want to strengthen your message? Copy one of the examples above to show your candidate what other local governments are already doing.

Questions to ask candidates

Ask candidates where they stand on the use of animals for entertainment, and what they would do to ensure animal welfare and public safety are protected.

Would you support prohibiting rodeos or specific rodeo events involving practices that cause animals pain, fear, stress, or risk of injury?
Would you support prohibiting mobile live animal programs involving exotic or wild animals?
Would you support a positive list of animal species that can be kept in the community?
Would you support prohibiting horse racing in our community?
Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on high-traffic roads or areas with heavy pedestrian and vehicle activity?
Share about this issue
A shareable graphic for social media that says "Animals shouldn't suffer for entertainment" with a picture of a sad-looking horse being ridden in a rodeo.
To download: right click + save image as
"This election, I’m asking candidates what they will do to protect animals from fear, stress, suffering and injury in entertainment, and support safer, animal-free alternatives."

Support policies that help keep people and pets together, assist pet guardians in need and strengthen protections for animals sold in pet stores

A person kneels down and speaks with a sitting person holding a dog leash.
What local governments can do

For many people, pets are family.

Local policies can help make communities more welcoming and safer for people and their companion animals. 

You can support this by advocating for pet-friendly housing and policies that reduce barriers for renters with pets, support for low-income pet guardians, and responsible regulation of the sale of live animals in pet stores.

Examples of local action​

Pet-friendly housing

Vancouver has incorporated pet-friendly housing considerations into its Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy, including within development frameworks such as the Broadway Plan. 

This shows how local housing policies can recognize the importance of keeping people and their pets together.

Live animal sales

Richmond, Vancouver, New Westminster and Delta have all taken municipal action to restrict the sale of live animals in pet stores, showing how local governments can strengthen protections for animals sold commercially.

Want to strengthen your message? Copy one of the examples above to show your candidate what other local governments are already doing.

Questions to ask candidates

Ask candidates what they would do to make your community more pet-friendly, help keep people and their animals together, and strengthen support for pets and their guardians.

Would you support policies that make it easier for renters to find and keep pet-friendly housing, including pet-friendly units in new affordable and supportive housing developments?
Would you support funding or partnerships for low-cost or subsidized veterinary services and programs that provide pet food to residents experiencing financial hardship?
Would you support policies that encourage pet stores to partner with local shelters and rescues rather than selling commercially bred animals?
Would you support restricting the sale of live animals in pet stores?

Share about this issue

A shareable graphic for social media that says "Pets are family" with a picture of a child and their dog cuddling on a pillow.
To download: right click + save image as
"This election, I’m asking candidates what they will do to support pet-friendly housing, help keep people and pets together, and strengthen protections for companion animals."
2. Ask your candidates

There are lots of ways to raise animal welfare issues during an election campaign. Choose the approach that feels most comfortable for you.

NOTE – The button above will take you to an external web page – Civic Info BC

Navigate to your municipality to find your candidates contact details.

By email or message

Use the template below to contact your candidates by email, direct message or social media. 

Choose one or more questions that matter most to you, then personalize the message with the candidate’s name, your community and the animal welfare issue you want to raise.

Tip: Keep your question concise, clear and respectful. Candidates receive many messages, and a focused question is more likely to get a useful response.

Dear (candidate name),

My name is (your name) and I live in (your community or neighbourhood).

As a resident and voter, animal welfare is one of my top priorities in this year’s local election. Decisions made at the local level have a real impact on animals. That is why I am reaching out to candidates to find out where they stand before I decide how to vote.

I would appreciate hearing your position on the topics below and how you would address them if elected.

(Add the animal welfare issues that matter most to you here. Consider providing some background information about the issue and then share your questions. You can copy the questions from the guide, or write your own in your own words.)

Thank you for your time, and for putting your name forward to serve our community. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

(Your name)
(Your community/postal code)

Engage in person
Events & debates

Bring the top questions that matter to you to candidate forums, debates and community events.

Tip: Some audience questions are invited in real-time, whereas others ask you to submit your questions ahead of time.

At the Door

If candidates or campaign volunteers come to your door, try asking one or two questions.

Tip: Not every candidate will be prepared to answer your question. Ask for their contact information so that you can follow up.

Make the conversation count
Prioritize animals

Share with candidates that animal welfare is a key election priority for you.

Keep it constructive

Constructive conversations can help people take animal welfare seriously.

Seek commitments

Find out what they would actually do if elected.

Ask, don’t attack

Give them an opportunity to explain their position.

Listen to the answer

Their reasoning can be just as informative as their final position.

Share responsibly

Don’t misrepresent or exaggerate a response.

3. Share what you learn

Your conversations with candidates can help other voters, too. If a candidate gives you a positive or specific response, consider sharing it with your friends, family and community. You can say:

I asked my local candidates what they would do for animal welfare.

Here’s what I learned…
Share it with the VHS!

Candidate responses can help build a picture of the commitments being made across B.C. and help inform animal welfare advocacy following the election. 

Forward us your responses ↓

info(at)VancouverHumaneSociety.bc.ca

No matter where you live in B.C.
Your voice can help shape the future for animals

Learn about the issues. Ask candidates where they stand. Encourage them to make concrete commitments.  
And together, we can build communities where animals, people, and the environment are safe and protected.

Authorized by Vancouver Humane Society, registered sponsor under LECFA, (604) 266-9744

Categories
News/Blog

Before you plan that wildlife experience… you should read this

In summary:
  • For many of us that love animals, we seek out experiences with them to feel closer.
  • Whether it’s watching whales, observing bears from a distance, or visiting an elephant sanctuary abroad, wildlife encounters can seem exciting and create lasting memories.  
  • However, not all wildlife experiences are created equal, and it can be difficult to tell whether your participation benefits or harms animals.
  • While observing animals in their natural habitats and from a safe distance can support conservation and appreciation for wildlife, many attractions involve captive wild animals and prioritize entertainment over the wellbeing of animals.

While the Vancouver Humane Society opposes keeping wild and exotic animals in permanent captivity for entertainment or education, new research offers a framework to help visitors make informed decisions before choosing to participate in wildlife tourism attractions. 

Learn more

Travelling tips

Tips for staying local

Share this post!

Why it’s so difficult to identify ethical wildlife attractions

Unlike restaurants or hotels, there are no universally accepted standards regulating wildlife tourism attractions around the world. In the absence of regulation, consumers make decisions based on advertisements, online reviews, or what appears enjoyable at first glance.

Researchers argue that responsible wildlife tourism depends on giving visitors better tools to evaluate attractions, not just based on marketing claims, but on meaningful indicators of animal welfare, conservation, and governance. 

  • There is no sufficient regulation of wildlife tourism attractions

  • The standards of treatment for animals are often determined by what tourists find acceptable

  • Wildlife tourist attractions marketed as educational or conservation-focused can have negative outcomes for animal welfare and the conservation of wild populations 

  • It can be difficult for tourists to know which attractions genuinely prioritize animals, and which are driven primarily by profit 

Problems arise when animals are suffering, and visitors don’t recognize the signs of poor welfare

Research has found that attractions with poor welfare and conservation outcomes often receive positive tourist reviews because visitors are not equipped to assess what animals need.

An animal may appear calm when they are stressed, resigned, or displaying abnormal behaviours that most people wouldn’t recognize. 

The authors describe several barriers that prevent tourists from making informed choices, including: 

  • Misleading marketing that emphasizes conservation without evidence

  • Limited transparency about how animals are acquired, housed, or managed

  • Psychological biases that lead people to assume enjoyable experiences must also be ethical, and

  • Inconsistent or absent regulation across different countries and tourism sectors

Looking beyond animal welfare alone

The researchers advocate that responsible wildlife tourism should be evaluated through three connected lenses:  

  1. Animal welfare: Are animals able to express natural behaviours? Are they free from unnecessary stress, pain, fear, and deprivation? 
  2. Conservation: Does the attraction genuinely contribute to protecting wildlife and habitats, or does it simply use conservation as a marketing tool?
  3. Governance: Is the organization transparent, accountable, scientifically informed, and committed to ethical management?

Looking at only one of these areas can paint an incomplete picture.

An attraction may support conservation programs but keep ambassador animals in poor conditions. Another may provide good day-to-day care while sourcing animals through harmful wildlife trade or breeding animals who will be kept in captivity permanently.

Responsible wildlife tourism requires considering all three together. 

Little girl watching wild rhinoceros in zoo, back view

Questions every traveler can ask

Rather than expecting tourists to become wildlife experts overnight, the researchers propose practical questions that anyone can use before visiting an attraction.

  • Does the attraction clearly explain its conservation work with measurable outcomes?

  • Are performances, rides, feeding sessions, or photo opportunities part of the business model?

  • Is there independent oversight or accreditation?

  • Does the organization provide transparent information about where animals came from and how they are cared for?

These kinds of questions shift attention away from whether an experience feels exciting and toward whether it benefits the animals involved.

Responsible tourism benefits animals and travelers

Ethical wildlife tourism doesn’t mean giving up unforgettable wildlife experiences.

In many cases, the most rewarding encounters happen when wild animals are observed behaving naturally in the wild from a safe distance or, where appropriate, by visiting accredited sanctuaries that prioritize the care and recovery of rescued animals over visitor experiences.

Choosing responsible wildlife experiences also sends an important message. By supporting opportunities to observe wildlife respectfully in their natural habitats or legitimate rescue and rehabilitation efforts that do not exploit animals, travelers help shift demand away from attractions that keep wild animals in captivity for entertainment.

How you can support wildlife while travelling

The Vancouver Humane Society encourages visitors to avoid attractions that keep wild animals in permanent captivity for the sake of entertainment or education.

This framework can help you assess an attraction’s animal welfare practices and make a more informed decision:

  • Research attractions beyond their marketing materials. 
  • Turn down attractions that involve touching, holding, riding, feeding, or posing for photos with wild animals. 
  • Look for organizations that are transparent and detailed about their conservation efforts and animal acquisition and care practices.  
    • Are the animals rescued?
    • Are they being rehabilitated for release back into the wild, or are they non-releasable and living in a sanctuary?  
    • Are animals being bred and kept permanently in captivity? 
  • Remember that ethical wildlife encounters involve observing animals from a respectful distance, when animals may not even be aware of your presence.  

How you can support wildlife in your local community

Staying close to home? There are still ways you can be a responsible wildlife tourist in your own community.

Mobile live animal programs are a common attraction, but they involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale, which raises welfare concerns.

Examples of mobile live animal programs can include:  

  • Travelling petting zoos at public or private events, such as community fairs or birthday parties 
  • Classroom presentations involving wild and exotic animals 
  • Reptile expos 
  • Events where exotic animals are sold  
Reptiles in small containers at an exotic pet expo

You can apply the same principles above to events in your community before choosing to attend. Learn more about the VHS’s campaign to regulate wild, exotic animals in B.C. 

More ways you can take action

Now that you are better equipped to assess wildlife attractions, there are even more ways to deepen your knowledge and help protect wild animals: 

  1. Check out the latest VHS podcast episode where we speak with Erin Ryan, the Wildlife Campaigns Manager at World Animal Protection, to dive deeper into the harms of captive wild animal attractions and what alternatives you can look for.
  2. Share this post to help raise awareness and inspire others to make wildlife-friendly choices  

Together, we can build a future where ethical wildlife tourism never needs to come at the expense of animal welfare.  

The VHS is grateful to the Animal Welfare Foundation of Canada for their generous grant funding of our work to raise awareness about the suffering of wild, exotic animals kept in captivity as pets and used in mobile live animal programs. 

Social media can be part of the solution, not the problem.

Share our content to reach more people and spread the word!

Categories
News/Blog

Treat wildlife trafficking as the serious crime that it is

Quick summary

  • Wildlife trafficking generates US$199 billion annually but is largely absent from binding global enforcement frameworks.
  • Elephanatics and World Elephant Day are calling for Canada to lead the global effort to establish a dedicated Wildlife Crime Protocol under the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC).
  • You can help by taking the quick action to contact your MP through Elephanatics’s campaign page.
Take quick action

Wildlife trafficking has become a major organized crime

Every year, transnational wildlife crime generates an estimated US$199 billion. Despite this, trafficking animals is often treated as a minor regulatory offence. That means organized crime networks can exploit Canada’s borders with relatively low risk and enormous reward.

Advocates at Elephanatics and World Elephant Day are working to change that, and they need your help.

Addressing wildlife tracking as the serious crime it is

Elephanatics, in partnership with World Elephant Day, is calling on Canadians to urge their Member of Parliament to support a dedicated Wildlife Crime Protocol under the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC), the principal global treaty for fighting international crime networks.

A dedicated protocol would require countries to treat wildlife trafficking with the same legal seriousness as other major organized crimes. It would give law enforcement better tools for cross-border investigations and intelligence sharing, and help dismantle a massive illegal industry that threatens ecosystems and economies worldwide.

Take quick action

Elephanatics has made it easy to contact your MP directly. Click the link below to send an email with just a few clicks.

Take quick action

Every email sent is a step toward meaningful structural change for wildlife around the world

Categories
News/Blog

Rainbow Bridge Remembrance Day

Did you know August 28th is Rainbow Bridge Remembrance Day? This day was originally created to honour our companion animals who have moved on.  

This day reminds us of the undeniable and special connection between humans and their pets: the unwavering love they share and their reminders to be present, to be silly, and to always take advantage of a good sunbeam nap.  

Today, in observation of Rainbow Bridge Remembrance Day, we invite you to give a special gift in honour of a pet who lives in your heart and has changed your life forever. 

When you donate below, you can choose to give in honour of a beloved companion. Your thoughtful gift will pay tribute to their life and bring hope and healing to animals in need today. 🌈 

Looking for other ways to support? Share this blog post! ❤️

🎵 Thank you @desireedawsonmusic for gifting us with “you’re who I see”. 100% of the proceeds from the song purchases on Bandcamp will go to the Vancouver Humane Society’s McVitie Fund.

Honour Their Memory 🌈 Bring Hope to Animals in Need

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Categories
News/Blog

“My angel Lola is recovering beautifully!”

“I cannot thank you enough. My angel Lola is recovering beautifully! … I am forever grateful to you for giving us more time together.”

Beautiful senior dog Lola is home safe and healthy now with her senior guardian.

At 12 years old, Lola still has a lot of life left in her. She is deaf and is highly visual, understanding facial expressions and some sign language. She loves strolling the neighbourhood with her guardian and her buddy and “hearing ear dog”, Dobby. She says hello to every person she meets. Her guardian says Lola considers it her duty to visit every patient at the Alzheimer’s hospital.

But this sweet girl’s life almost didn’t have a chance to begin.

Because Lola was born deaf, her breeder wanted to euthanize her. She was rescued by her guardian “Carol” (name changed for privacy), and the two have been an incredible support for each other ever since.

“She is an angel and has changed my life. I have severe anxiety, often unable to even get to the grocery store, but with Lola, I am able to get out because she loves being the social butterfly. She insists we stop and see every person that crosses our path! She has opened my world.”

For the first six years of her life, Lola suffered from seizures until Carol finally found a medication to keep them under control. She has now been seizure-free for half of her lifetime!

Lola has also stood by Carol’s side, offering invaluable comfort and love through health struggles including cancer.

“This little girl, with all her strength and heart, has taught me to be a fighter.”

Six months ago, Carol noticed that Lola would soon need dental care. She tried getting part time work to save up, but as a 70-year-old woman dealing with her own health struggles, she was sadly not able to save up the funds in time. She recently found Lola running back and forth rubbing her mouth on furniture trying to cope with a very painful toothache.

Without a credit card and almost out of options, Carol reached out to her last hope for support: the VHS’s McVitie Fund.

“We were up all night because she doesn’t know what to do with herself, running back and forth, rubbing her mouth on everything … wondering why I am not helping her.”

Thanks to generous supporters from the community who make this work possible, Lola was able to get the urgent care she needed to feel better and come home.

Carol shared that she is so grateful to have more time with Lola.

Every day, donors who support the McVitie Fund make these happy stories possible: bringing animals home safe and healthy, taking care of those in urgent need, and keeping loving families together.

The McVitie Fund helps an average of 140 animals each month, with each care case needing an average of $500 in assistance. These life-changing assistance funds are entirely donated by caring members of the community. That’s why every donation, no matter the size, makes such a meaningful difference.

Could you make a gift today to help give animals like Lola more time with their families who love them?

Yes! I’ll donate to pets in need.
Categories
News/Blog

How campaigners took on industrial farming in Denmark’s ‘pig election’

How campaigners beat industrial farming in Denmark’s ‘pig election’

Mette Frederiksen’s new government promises overhaul for people – and animals – in home of ultra-intensive farming

Progress for animals often moves slowly. This can be disheartening. As an animal ally, it can feel as though others don’t care enough to make change. But how much is that feeling based in reality?

When asked about animal issues, most Canadians express care and concern. Most people with companion animals consider those animals to be part of the family. Canadians are also largely opposed to activities that pose animal welfare concerns, such as trophy hunting (83% opposed), killing animals for their fur (78% opposed), rodeos (65% opposed), and zoos and aquariums (58% opposed).

Animal welfare is typically a bipartisan issue in Canada, resonating with people regardless of which political party they vote for. Still, animal welfare alone is rarely a motivator for change from decision-makers.

What happens when animal allies unite with other changemakers?

A recent election in Denmark answered that question, as advocates for animal welfare, the environment, and residents made pig farming a major election issue through two years of focused campaigning.

Citizens used their votes to show they care about the animal welfare, land use, environmental, and human impacts of pig farming, a main industry in Denmark.

Collaboration with other sectors has helped make progress for animals in Canada.

Animal advocates in Canada have teamed up with advocates on other issues and highlighted the overlap between the health of animals, humans, and our shared environment.

Here in British Columbia, a permanent ban on the farming of mink for fur was announced in 2021 due to public health risks.

In 2023, a phase-out of toxicity testing on animals was included in an update to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

The Protecting Victims Act passed this summer, criminalizing the distribution of animal sexual abuse material while recognizing harm and threats against animals as part of coercive control and criminal harassment.

Collaboration paints a promising path forward.

These stories paint a promising path forward in animal advocacy; one where collaboration with other advocates and intersections with other important issues create real opportunities for meaningful change.

Read article
Take action for farmed animals
Categories
News/Blog

Win for animals: Tripadvisor no longer allows rodeo & racing ticket sales

Animal advocates around the world are celebrating a step forward as Tripadvisor has strengthened their animal welfare policy! The new policy evaluates activities involving animals “informed by the Five Domains of Animal Welfare, a globally recognised framework that assesses an animal’s quality of life”:

Source: Tripadvisor.ca

The new policy “does not enable booking for experiences that involve animal racing, such as most dog, horse and camel racing or for rodeo-style events”. It also forbids sales of tickets for attractions including elephant riding and those involving captive whales and dolphins.

This important step forward involves a major company acknowledging that many animal entertainment events cause unnecessary risk and stress to animals. It also helps travellers to make more compassionate choices about the events and attractions they attend.

To learn more about choosing compassionate events and attractions, check out the VHS’s podcast episode on An animal-friendly summer break with Erin Ryan.

Podcast: An animal-friendly summer break

Cover photo: Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals Media.

Categories
News/Blog

When thousands of farmed animals cannot evacuate, the system needs to change

In summary:
  • On many large-scale farms, tens of thousands of animals may be housed in a single facility.
  • During a fast-moving barn fire, wildfire, extreme heat event, flood, or power failure, there may be no practical way to move every animal to safety.
  • Approximately 165,000 chickens died in a recent Abbotsford barn fire. Weeks later, at least 20,000 pigs died in a fire at an industrial farm in southern Ontario.
  • Current industry codes of practice generally call for farms to have emergency plans, but do not require proof that those plans can protect every animal.

TAKE ACTION: Sign now to call on the B.C. government to strengthen protections for farmed animals before the next disaster strikes.

Take Action
Learn More

Share this post!

A tragedy and a warning

On May 21, 2026, approximately 165,000 chickens died when three poultry barns caught fire in Abbotsford.

Each chicken was a sentient animal capable of feeling fear, pain and stress. Confined inside the barns, they had no way to escape.

This was a devastating tragedy.

It was also a warning about a system that confines enormous numbers of animals in facilities where evacuation are virtually impossible.

The aftermath of a barn fire in Abbotsford
The aftermath of a barn fire in Abbotsford is seen on Friday May 22, 2026. (CityNews Image)

Why large-scale evacuation may be impossible

Evacuating a farm is not as simple as opening a barn door.

Animals must be caught or gathered, safely handled and loaded into suitable crates or trailers. They must then be transported somewhere with enough space, food, water and shelter.

This can require trained workers, specialized equipment, available vehicles and drivers, safe and accessible roads, veterinarians, backup power and fuel, and suitable places to house the animals.

  • Animals who are sick, injured, or affected by heat or smoke may not be safe to transport.
  • Birds housed by the tens of thousands cannot simply be released outside.
  • Pigs and cattle may panic, become injured, or be unable to move through floodwater, smoke, or crowded handling areas.
  • Even when animals can be loaded, there may be nowhere for them to go.

Nearby farms may already be full, affected by the same emergency or unable to accept animals because of disease and biosecurity concerns.

During a regional disaster, many farms may need the same trailers, workers, roads, and receiving sites at the same time.

For a barn holding tens of thousands of chickens, hundreds of cattle, or thousands of pigs, there may be no workable way to move every animal within minutes, or even hours.

Thousands of Small chickens in a big hatchery
An industrial chicken barn housing tens of thousands of chickens

This has already happened

The Abbotsford fire was not an isolated example.

In July 2026, at least 20,000 pigs died in a fire at a large industrial farm near Simcoe, Ontario. The fire spread through a facility covering about 200,000 square feet.

The scale of these fires makes the problem painfully clear. When tens of thousands of animals are confined inside one facility, there may be no practical way to reach and rescue them.

B.C.’s 2021 disasters exposed the same problem on an even larger scale.

During the floods in the Sumas Prairie, rising water covered farms and roads, cutting off access to animals. Approximately 630,000 chickens, 12,000 pigs and 450 cows died.

Some farmers moved animals to higher ground or other facilities. In many cases, however, water rose too quickly, roads became impassable, or there was nowhere available to take them.

That same year, more than 650,000 farmed birds died during B.C.’s extreme heat dome. Many were confined in barns that depended on mechanical ventilation and cooling.

Barn fires, floods, wildfires, extreme heat and power failures are different emergencies. They reveal the same systemic risk: enormous numbers of animals are being kept in conditions where their lives depend on buildings, roads, equipment and emergency systems that can fail.

Properties inundated by flood waters in Abbotsford, B.C. in 2021
Properties inundated by flood waters are seen in Abbotsford, B.C., Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2021. Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press

Climate change is increasing the risk

B.C. is facing more frequent and severe heat, wildfire, flood and smoke events. These emergencies can develop quickly and affect entire regions at once.

Large-scale animal deaths also carry wider costs. Emergency responders may be placed in dangerous conditions. Farmers and workers experience serious emotional and financial harm. Communities face the costs of emergency response, rebuilding, and the disposal of thousands of animal bodies. Floodwater can carry manure, fuel and other contaminants into homes, waterways and surrounding land.

As the risks grow, relying on individual farms to solve this problem on their own is not enough.

B.C. has an opportunity to act

In 2024, B.C.’s Farmed Animal Welfare Advisory Committee released a report recommending major changes to the province’s farmed animal welfare framework.

The recommendations included:

  • creating a government inspection and enforcement function
  • introducing proactive, risk-based inspections
  • expanding enforcement options
  • improving public reporting
  • including farmed animals in emergency-management regulations
  • assessing aging infrastructure and climate risks
  • clarifying the responsibilities of government, industry and emergency partners
  • improving emergency access to water, cooling, vet care and essential support

These recommendations are an important starting point. However, the B.C. government has not publicly provided a clear plan or timeline for implementing them.

Take action for farmed animals

Farmed animals deserve stronger protections before disaster strikes.

The VHS is calling on the B.C. government to move forward with meaningful changes through the Farmed Animal Welfare Framework review, including:

  • A clear implementation plan and timeline.
  • Proactive inspections, transparent reporting, and stronger enforcement.
  • Require farms to prove animals can be evacuated or safely sheltered.
  • Building and fire-safety requirements that protect animal lives.
  • A shift away from intensive systems that put animals at risk on a massive scale.

After signing, share the action with other B.C. residents and invite them to speak up.

When thousands of animals cannot be evacuated, the system needs to change.

Categories
News/Blog

The Calgary Stampede hasn’t answered: what happened to the animals in 2026?

The VHS is raising concerns about transparency and accountability at the Stampede and about a recent update to Alberta’s Animal Protection Act that was passed without public consultation. The change makes it harder to protect animals used in rodeo and chuckwagon races from distress.

In summary:
  • Following another controversial year for the Calgary Stampede rodeo and chuckwagon races, the VHS reached out to the Stampede Board of Directors and Executive Management team requesting an update on this year’s animal incidents, injuries and any deaths.
  • To date, the VHS has still not received a response or acknowledgement from the Calgary Stampede.
  • The 2026 Calgary Stampede rodeo and chuckwagon races saw several incidents, including a chuckwagon collision resulting in the serious injury of a horse.
  • The Stampede also denied a media pass to We Animals Media, an animal photojournalism organization, further limiting public transparency around their treatment of animals.
Take Action
Sign the #SayNoToRodeo Pledge
Learn More

Share this post!

The 2026 Calgary Stampede ended on July 13th with a confirmed serious injury and three other concerning animal incidents.

Despite reaching out to Stampede officials to confirm the status of these animals, the Vancouver Humane Society has still not heard back.

On July 19th, the Vancouver Humane Society wrote directly to the Calgary Stampede to inquire about several concerning incidents:

  • One horse was confirmed to be seriously injured during an unaired heat of the chuckwagon races on July 11th. 
  • Another heat from the same day was not aired and results show that a team did not finish the race; this often indicates an incident or animal injury.
  • During a calf roping event on July 12th, a calf appeared motionless after being caught. The cameras quickly cut away.
  • Rodeo handlers received criticism for rough handling of a horse in a bucking event on July 8th.

The VHS requested that Calgary Stampede organizers respond with the status of these animals and the number of animal injuries and fatalities at the 2026 rodeo and chuckwagon races by July 27th. That deadline has passed with no response or acknowledgment from the Stampede.

Take Action
Sign the #SayNoToRodeo Pledge

The Stampede’s lack of transparency conflicts with their own welfare messaging.

The Calgary Stampede regularly emphasizes its commitment to animal welfare. But being transparent about their animal welfare practices would mean providing honest, timely information when animals are hurt, especially when those incidents are captured on video and witnessed by thousands of people.

The public deserves to know what happened to these animals so they can make informed decisions about attending risky animal entertainment events.

Meanwhile, Alberta law change weakens protections for animals used in rodeo.

The silence from the Stampede comes at a troubling moment for animals used in rodeo and chuckwagon racing in Alberta.

Earlier this year, when Alberta’s Animal Protection Act was being updated with a new loophole for animal sporting events, the VHS and supporters wrote to Alberta decision-makers to raise concerns.

A proposed change allowed distress caused to animals in sporting activities, as long as those activities followed “reasonable and generally accepted practices.”

The amendment that passed explicitly names chuckwagon racing and rodeo, exempting them from distress protections that other animals receive. It also makes it an offence to make “frivolous or vexatious” complaints to law enforcement.

There was no public comment period on this significant change.

As journalist Jessica Scott-Reid recently wrote in the Toronto Star, this new law amendment leaves animals more vulnerable and will likely discourage the public from making complaints.  

“The legislature didn’t write that exemption because these events are safe. It wrote that exemption because it knew they weren’t, and it chose to protect the rodeo industry instead of the safety of these horses”

said Alexandra Pester, a Calgary-based lawyer with Animal Justice.

Take Action
Sign the #SayNoToRodeo Pledge
Dozens of activists gather with signs protesting the 2026 Calgary Stampede
Activists gather with signs protesting the 2026 Calgary Stampede

Your voice can help ensure animals’ voices and well-being aren’t left behind.

Below are three important actions you can take today for animals used in the Calgary Stampede’s rodeo and chuckwagon events.

1. Use the quick-action tool below to contact decision-makers

2. Keep the momentum going by signing the #SayNoToRodeo pledge

3. Contact the Calgary Stampede directly using their public contact form to share your concerns and request an update on the animal incidents at this year’s event

After signing, share the action with others and invite them to speak up.

Categories
News/Blog

Cold-blooded & complex: what new research says about reptile care

“The study … shows how limited the evidence is, and how much more research is needed … before people can confidently claim that common captive care practices protect reptile welfare.”

In summary:
  • Reptiles are readily available through pet stores and hobbyist sellers, where they are often marketed as “easy” or “low-maintenance” pets. A new scientific review suggests a much more complicated reality.
  • The paper reviewed decades of research on captive reptile welfare and found that the evidence base for reptile care is still surprisingly small.
  • The authors identified just 72 papers, representing 75 studies, that tested a change to captive reptile care and measured its effect using at least one welfare-related indicator.
  • Reptiles are commonly kept in a wide range of captive settings, including zoos, laboratories, farms, classrooms, rehabilitation centres, and private homes, using practices that historically relied on tradition, assumptions, or anecdotal advice, often called ‘folklore husbandry’, rather than strong scientific evidence.
Learn More

Share this post!

Reptile welfare research is growing, but major gaps remain

The review found that reptile welfare research has increased over time, which is encouraging, but the available studies are not evenly distributed across species or settings.

  • Species: Most studies focused on squamates, the group that includes snakes and lizards, while other reptiles were less represented.
  • Settings: Much of the research also took place in controlled environments such as laboratories and zoos. Laboratory settings alone made up about 43 per cent of studies, while research in the companion animal industry represented only about 1 per cent.

This is a serious gap.

Many reptiles are kept in private homes, where care can vary widely and oversight is limited. Without research that reflects the conditions animals actually experience in homes, expos, breeding operations, and other commercial settings, it is difficult to know whether common care recommendations truly support good welfare.

A calf lying in the ground with 3 of it's legs tied together and a rope around it's neck.

Most studies looked at enclosures, not the full picture

Nearly half of the studies focused on changes to the physical environment, such as enclosure size, furnishings (such as climbing structures, hides, caves, or ledges), lighting, or substrate (e.g. bedding, flooring, litter, etc.). The most common changes noted by the researchers involved adding or changing enclosure furnishings.

These factors are especially important for reptiles because their bodies and behaviour are closely tied to their surroundings. Temperature, light, humidity, shelter, substrate, and opportunities to climb, burrow, bask, hide, or explore can all shape their well-being.

But the review also found that fewer studies examined other important areas, including human interaction, enrichment, or social contact with other members of the same species.

Measuring welfare in reptiles is challenging

The paper also highlights a major challenge in animal welfare science: how to tell whether a reptile is doing well.

Behaviour was the most commonly used welfare measure, appearing in more than half of the studies. Behaviour can offer important clues, such as how animals use their space, whether they hide, explore, bask, or show signs of stress.

But behaviour alone may not tell the whole story, especially for reptiles, who may mask signs of illness or distress.

Physical measures, such as body condition and growth, and physiological measures, such as stress hormones, were used less often. The authors note that only three studies included all three types of welfare indicators: behavioural, physical, and physiological.

For animals with complex and species-specific needs, relying on one type of measurement can leave important welfare concerns hidden.

What does this mean for exotic animals kept as pets?

The study does not show that captivity can meet reptiles’ needs. Instead, it shows how limited the evidence is, and how much more research is needed before people can confidently claim that common captive care practices protect reptile welfare.

Wild and exotic animals retain complex social, physiological, and behavioural needs, even when bred in captivity. The VHS opposes the sale and keeping of exotic pets and advocates for stronger protections to prevent animals from being kept in environments where their needs cannot be met.

The findings also support the need for a precautionary, science-based approach to exotic animal regulations. The VHS has called for a positive list framework, which would only allow species to be kept as pets if they are proven suitable based on animal welfare, public health, safety, and environmental criteria.

snakes in plastic candy containers  stacked on top of one another with nothing but sawdust

Animals deserve more than guesswork

Reptiles are sentient animals with needs that are often poorly understood and difficult to meet in captivity. Animal care should not be based on what is convenient, traditional, or profitable. Rather, it should be based on strong evidence and on the animal’s well-being.

When it comes to reptiles and other exotic animals, compassion means looking beyond the enclosure and asking a more fundamental question: should these animals be kept as pets at all?

You can help reptiles by:

  • Sharing this information with your friends and family
  • Not purchasing reptiles as pets
  • Supporting reputable rescues that prioritize animal welfare
  • Not engaging with harmful content that promotes wild animals as pets

Social media can be part of the solution, not the problem.

Share our content to reach more people and spread the word!

The VHS would like to thank the Animal Welfare Foundation of Canada for providing funding to support this work.

Animal Welare Foundation of Canada Logo