Category: News/Blog

Categories
News/Blog

Thousands are speaking up for animals at rodeos

A group of animal activists protesting outside of the Calgary Stampede asking for kinder events for animals.

This summer, thousands of people joined the VHS in calling for a kinder future for animals used in rodeos, both online and on the ground, and your support helped make that possible.

In Calgary, the VHS supplied Calgary Animal Rights Effort (CARE) with resources for four peaceful Buck the Rodeo rallies near the Stampede grounds. Local advocates spoke directly with Stampede visitors, distributed Rodeo Truth educational materials and shared cruelty-free ways to enjoy Stampede season without events that harm animals. Animal Justice also joined advocates at the rallies, helping strengthen the local effort.

1,900,000

views of animal welfare messaging from VHS rodeo campaigns

And thanks to animal allies like you, the message travelled much further. More than 7,600 direct actions have been taken by supporters across the VHS’s B.C. rodeo and Calgary Stampede campaigns so far in 2026. Together, the rodeo campaigns were viewed more than 1.9 million times, bringing animal welfare concerns to a massive new audience.

Take action on B.C. rodeos
Take action on Calgary Stampede
7,600

direct actions in support of ending inhumane rodeo events

Behind that impact was the advocacy work your support makes possible.
The VHS monitored multiple B.C. rodeos on the ground, documented concerning incidents and wrote directly to organizers asking for answers and accountability. The VHS also teamed up with We Animals Media and Animal Justice to call for greater transparency at the Calgary Stampede after We Animals was denied media accreditation to attend and document the Stampede.

Together, the organizations brought national attention to the importance of independent documentation and public accountability.
From supporting grassroots advocates to collaborating nationally and mobilizing thousands of animal allies, your support helps to build public awareness, strengthen the movement and create pressure for lasting change.

Categories
News/Blog

Protecting animals behind the scenes

When animals appear on screen or arrive at a community event, it is easy to miss what happens behind the scenes. Thanks to your support, The Vancouver Humane Society is working to ensure animals used in television, film, and mobile live animal programs, such as petting zoos and reptile expos, are treated humanely.

Media red flags list

The VHS team is attending exotic animal expos to document welfare concerns, bringing in international experts to share evidence with decision makers, and sharing on social media about the needs of exotic animals. Alongside partner organizations and experts, we are developing practical recommendations to share with the provincial government to better protect animals.

The VHS is grateful to the Animal Welfare Foundation of Canada for their generous grant funding of our work to raise awareness about the suffering of wild, exotic animals kept in captivity for entertainment, as pets, and used in mobile live animal programs. The rest of this work was made possible through kind donations from animal allies. Thank you for standing with animals and helping create meaningful change.

Categories
News/Blog

Plant-based advocacy saves farmed animal lives

Quick summary

  • The VHS’s PlantUniversity program published billboards and bus ads across Vancouver this summer to share the benefits of plant-based eating.
  • The program expects to reach 300,000 people through billboards and bus ads and nearly 430,000 people through online messages this year.
  • The VHS also hosted VegFest at UBC on September 28 to share the joys of plant-based eating with thousands of students.
  • Each person who chooses plant-based food can save hundreds of animal lives every year.
Plant-based resources

Bus ads and billboards share the benefits of plant-based eating

What if compassion for animals could start with what’s for dinner? That’s the question the PlantUniversity program is trying to answer this fall.

Starting in the summer and extending throughout the rest of the year, the PlantUniversity team has published advertisements all over buses, billboards, and the internet to encourage people to help farmed animals by choosing more plant-based foods.

By showcasing the ways that plant-based eating helps animals, our environment, and our own health, PlantUniversity is amplifying the voices of farmed animals and saving lives every day. Every plant-based meal makes a difference, and the team wants to make it easier with simple recipes and guides available at their website.

How effective is plant-based advocacy? Each person who chooses plant-based food can save hundreds of animal lives every year. Research shows that this type of advocacy could spare 3.7 animal lives for each dollar spent (USD).

VegFest at UBC shared the joy of plant-based food with thousands of students

Another exciting program was the return of UBC VegFest on September 28th, an event dedicated to showing students in Vancouver all of the amazing options they have around them to choose plant-based.

Local businesses, advocacy groups, and student clubs all gathered outdoors to offer free samples, meals, and resources to help cook at home. The event meets students during an important stage when many are choosing what to cook for the first time in their lives. UBC VegFest helps those students make the choices that help animals, one meal at a time.

More plant-based resources
Categories
News/Blog

2026 B.C. Local Elections: Where Candidates Stand on Key Animal Welfare Issues

The Vancouver Humane Society (VHS) contacted local election candidates in key B.C. communities where current or ongoing animal welfare issues overlap with the VHS’s local advocacy work.

Candidates in these communities were invited to respond to the same questionnaire addressing specific animal welfare issues, such as horse carriages, horse racing, rodeos, mobile live animal programs and exotic animals in captivity.

The responses below are from candidates who have responded to date. Candidates who did not respond are not included in the response summaries.

Responses are organized by community, are presented as received and have not been edited for content. The VHS has not interpreted, rated, or otherwise assessed candidates’ responses. 

Select a community from the list below to see the candidates who responded and their answers to each question asked by the VHS. Subscribe for local election resources and updates.

Abbotsford
Chilliwack
Clinton 
Coombs
Delta
Nanaimo
Osoyoos
Surrey
Vancouver
Victoria

Don’t see your community, question, or candidate here?

Explore the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to contact candidates in your area, ask your own questions, and access helpful resources like candidate tracking tools, message templates, and shareable graphics.

Share this post!

Abbotsford

The VHS asked candidates in Abbotsford the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Abbotsford? “

Background provided to candidates

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. They often include a wide range of species, ranging from farmed animals like goats, lambs, and chicks, to wild, exotic species like snakes, lizards, tortoises, and sugar gliders. They can include travelling petting zoos, animal presentations at schools and birthday parties, animal displays at community events, and reptile or exotic pet expos.

These programs can expose animals to frequent transportation, repeated public handling, unfamiliar environments, temporary or undersized enclosures, noise and other stressful conditions, often with limited or no opportunity to retreat from public view or engage in natural behaviours. And because healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella, the risks reach people too, especially young children, older adults, and pregnant people. Many examples of disease outbreaks in connection to mobile live animal programs have been documented in recent years.

The VHS believes local governments can play an important role in determining whether and where MLAPs are permitted to operate. For example, the City of Port Moody has adopted a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.

Please briefly explain your position and what action you would take if elected.

“Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?”

Background provided to candidates

Many MLAPs feature exotic animals (wild animals native to countries outside Canada) such as snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders. These animals have complex behavioural, social, dietary, and environmental needs that can be extremely difficult to meet in private homes. The promotion and sale of exotic animals at MLAPs can also contribute to impulse purchases, animal surrender, and risks to native wildlife when exotic animals escape or are released. 

The VHS supports a science-based “positive list” approach, in which species would only be permitted to be kept as pets after being assessed, using a scoring tool like EMODE, as suitable based on factors such as animal welfare, health, public safety, and environmental considerations.

Local governments can use local bylaws and licensing tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals. For example, the City of Castlegar’s Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw includes provisions addressing exotic pets, animal performance, exhibition, and display.

Mayor Candidate responses

No response received yet.

The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.

If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.

You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.

→ Explore the election guide and contact your local candidates

Council Candidate responses

Jeremy Klix

Thank you for reaching out and for all the information you have provided.

Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Abbotsford?

I would support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Abbotsford. Abbotsford is an agricultural community with many chicken, pig, and cattle farms.

I would be concerned that frequent transport of animals, and interaction with humans could also pose a disease threat to our farm animals. I would work with other councillors to promote education in our community to get public support, followed with putting forward a restriction or ban.

Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?

Yes. Our local painted turtle population is threatened by invasive species including non native pet turtles that were released, so I fully support regulations that preserve our indigenous wildlife.

Joel Madsen

Thanks for reaching out. This isn’t a subject I’m terribly familiar with, so I’ll try my best to answer based on my limited knowledge as well as my personal reasoning.

1. Mobile live animal programs: I wouldn’t support a blanket ban on mobile animal programs. I think these programs can be a great way for kids and families to learn about animals, especially in an agricultural community like Abbotsford. Animal welfare and public safety absolutely need to be taken seriously, but I don’t think we should be creating more restrictions for responsible operators because of the actions of a few. I’d rather see us address specific problems where they exist and make sure proper standards are being followed.

2. Exotic animals as pets: I’d be more inclined to look at restrictions when it comes to exotic animals, particularly species that are difficult to properly care for or could pose a risk to people or the environment. That said, I don’t think we should lump all exotic animals into the same category. There are plenty of snakes, lizards, and other exotic pets that people could responsibly care for.

I’d be open to exploring a more in depth approach that looks at individual species and their needs. I’d also want to understand what regulations are already in place before adding new ones.

I think we can find a reasonable balance between protecting animals and allowing responsible pet ownership.

Rick Thiessen

I would not fully restrict mobile live animal programs as I believe they have some value as long as they are conducted in safe and responsible ways.

Chilliwack

The VHS asked candidates in Chilliwack the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Chilliwack, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”

Background provided to candidates

The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.

The VHS documented concerning incidents at the Chilliwack rodeo over several years, including in 2022 and 2023, with visibly stressed and agitated animals being roughly handled, thrashing around in the chutes, and being put at risk of injury. The VHS also documented electric prod use in 2018 and 2019 at the Chilliwack rodeo.

Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.

Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.

Mayor Candidate responses

No response received yet.

The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.

If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.

You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.

→ Explore the election guide and contact your local candidates

Council Candidate responses

Nilsana Charkhandeh

Yes. I believe animals should be treated humanely and protected from unnecessary pain, fear, and distress.

If elected to Chilliwack City Council, I would support appropriate restrictions or prohibitions on rodeo practices, tools, or handling methods where credible evidence demonstrates that they cause unnecessary suffering or an unreasonable risk of injury to animals.

I would also support reviewing the standards and conditions for animal-based events within the City’s jurisdiction, in consultation with animal-welfare professionals, veterinarians, event organizers, agricultural representatives, and the community. Decisions should be evidence-based, enforceable, and respectful of Chilliwack’s agricultural community.

Traditions can evolve while still respecting their history and community significance.

If a practice cannot be carried out without unnecessary pain, fear, or injury to an animal, I do not believe it should be permitted simply because it is a tradition.

Steve Just

Thank you for reaching out and sharing these concerns. Animal welfare matters to me, and I would want any concerns about mistreatment taken seriously.

At this point, I would reserve my decision on the prohibitions you’re proposing until I’ve reviewed the evidence. I would want to understand what happened, whether any investigations found violations, and what rules and oversight are already in place. I would also want to hear from animal-welfare professionals and the rodeo organizers.

I respect the rodeo’s place in our community, and I believe animal welfare needs to be part of that conversation.

If elected, I would ask City staff to explain the City’s authority and the options available before deciding on restrictions, funding, or other support.

If you have investigation findings or follow-up reports relating to the incidents you’ve mentioned, please send them along with the footage.

That would help me make an informed decision. My approach is to listen, review the facts, and then take a position I can explain and stand behind.

Zeeshan Khan

I believe rodeos are an important part of Chilliwack’s agricultural heritage and community identity. They bring people together, celebrate our farming roots, and contribute to local events and traditions. I want to see these traditions continue, but this continuation must never come at the expense of animal wellness. Animal abuse and the unnecessary suffering of animals are absolutely unacceptable, and protecting our community’s traditions must go hand in hand with protecting the animals involved.

If elected, I would support developing and enforcing strict, evidence-based municipal bylaws and event-permit conditions that establish clear animal welfare standards for rodeos held in Chilliwack. This would include prohibiting abusive handling practices, establishing firm restrictions on harmful tools and equipment, veterinary oversight, and procedures to prevent distress. These standards must be enforceable, with meaningful consequences for violations, including penalties or restrictions on future event permits where warranted. Equally important, I would work directly with rodeo organizers, agricultural organizations, animal welfare experts and veterinarians to ensure these events are safe. Those who work with animals have valuable practical knowledge, and meaningful collaboration would help establish standards that are effective.

My goal would be to ensure a community tradition evolves responsibly. Chilliwack can honour its agricultural heritage while setting a clear expectation that animal abuse is non-negotiable. We can work toward keeping rodeos in our community while ensuring animals are treated humanely and unnecessary harm is prevented.

Thank you for this wonderful question and bringing awareness to a very important topic.

Lisa Morry

Thanks for your question. I support kindness to animals, if elected, I would continue to work for animal kindness in Chilliwack.

Ghazaleh Nozamani

Thank you for reaching out and for giving me the opportunity to respond. As someone who has spent much of my life advocating for human rights, dignity, and protection from unnecessary suffering, I believe compassion should extend to animals as well.

How we treat those who cannot speak for themselves reflects our values as a community. I support strong and enforceable animal-welfare standards and would not support practices that unnecessarily cause animals pain, fear, injury, or distress.

At the same time, I notice that the incidents referenced in your question are from 2018, 2019, 2022, and 2023. I would be interested to see the most recent information, and I hope there is an updated report for the 2026 Chilliwack rodeo showing whether practices and animal-welfare standards have improved.

If elected, I would support reviewing current evidence and working with animal-welfare experts, veterinarians, event organizers, and the community to determine what municipal conditions or restrictions are appropriate.

Where a practice is demonstrated to be inhumane, I would support taking action to prevent it and would not support using municipal resources to enable animal cruelty.

I respect Chilliwack’s agricultural heritage and traditions, but tradition and compassion do not have to compete with each other. We can celebrate our history while continuing to improve how animals are treated.

My approach would be based on evidence, compassion, and accountability, and on the most current information available.

Clinton

The VHS asked candidates in Coombs the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Clinton, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”

Background provided to candidates

The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.

The VHS documented concerning incidents at the Clinton rodeo in 2024 and 2026, including visibly stressed and agitated animals; inhumane use of electric prods; and harsh handling including a horse being repeatedly struck in the face and punched in the neck while in a bucking chute; a horse being repeatedly whipped by a rider as they prepared for a steer wrestling event; and a handler striking a visibly stressed bull with a paddle.

Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.

Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.

Mayor Candidate responses

No response received yet.

The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.

If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.

You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.

→ Explore the election guide and contact your local candidates

Council Candidate responses

No response received yet.

The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.

If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.

You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.

→ Explore the election guide and contact your local candidates

Coombs

The VHS asked candidates in Coombs the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Coombs, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”

Background provided to candidates

The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.

Footage from the Coombs “Bulls, Broncs & Barrels” rodeo in 2024 and 2025 captured inhumane treatment of animals, including repeated electric prod use; harsh handling of a fallen horse; visibly stressed animals thrashing in chutes, rearing up, and resisting handlers. Despite the BC SPCA issuing a notice to rodeo organizers to cease harsh or inhumane training, disciplinary or handling techniques or physical abuse and to cease “excessive” use of electric prods after the 2024 Coombs rodeo, the VHS again documented similar concerns in 2025.

Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.

Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.

Electoral Area Director Candidate responses

Leanne Salter

Thank you for reaching out and for giving candidates an opportunity to respond to this important issue. I take animal welfare seriously, and I believe animals should be treated humanely and with respect. My record demonstrates that this is more than a statement of principle.

During my eight years as the elected Director for Electoral Area F, I have worked closely with the BC SPCA and others on animal-welfare issues. Most notably, I advocated for stronger provincial protections regarding exotic cats, including servals which was an emergent issue in Area F.

I worked with the BC SPCA, provincial officials, Ministers and other elected representatives to bring this issue forward. I am proud that, effective May 1, 2026, British Columbia implemented legislation prohibiting the breeding, transport and future ownership of non-native, non-domestic cats, including servals.

With respect to rodeos, I believe animals must be treated humanely and that unnecessary cruelty should never be accepted.

The rodeo held in Coombs has received Temporary Use Permits from the Regional District of Nanaimo during my eight years as Director. As an elected representative, I have a responsibility to consider applications within the authority provided to the RDN and to apply the same standards to all applicants.

I would expect any rodeo or other event held in Area F to comply fully with provincial animal-welfare legislation and all applicable RDN requirements. Where credible concerns about animal treatment are brought forward, I believe those concerns should be properly investigated by the appropriate authority and considered in any future regulatory or permitting decisions where the RDN has jurisdiction.

I would not make a commitment to prohibit specific rodeo events or practices without first establishing that the RDN has the legal authority to do so and that such a prohibition is legally enforceable. I believe elected officials have a responsibility to advocate for animal welfare while also respecting the division of authority between local and provincial government.

My work on the provincial exotic-cat legislation demonstrates that when I believe stronger animal-welfare protections are needed, I am prepared to work with organizations such as the BC SPCA, provincial Ministers and other elected representatives to pursue meaningful legislative change.

Delta

The VHS asked candidates in Delta the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Delta? “

Background provided to candidates

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. They often include a wide range of species, ranging from farmed animals like goats, lambs, and chicks, to wild, exotic species like snakes, lizards, tortoises, and sugar gliders. They can include travelling petting zoos, animal presentations at schools and birthday parties, animal displays at community events, and reptile or exotic pet expos.

These programs can expose animals to frequent transportation, repeated public handling, unfamiliar environments, temporary or undersized enclosures, noise and other stressful conditions, often with limited or no opportunity to retreat from public view or engage in natural behaviours. And because healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella, the risks reach people too, especially young children, older adults, and pregnant people. Many examples of disease outbreaks in connection to mobile live animal programs have been documented in recent years.

The VHS believes local governments can play an important role in determining whether and where MLAPs are permitted to operate. For example, the City of Port Moody has adopted a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.

“Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?”

Background provided to candidates

Many MLAPs feature exotic animals (wild animals native to countries outside Canada) such as snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders. These animals have complex behavioural, social, dietary, and environmental needs that can be extremely difficult to meet in private homes. The promotion and sale of exotic animals at MLAPs can also contribute to impulse purchases, animal surrender, and risks to native wildlife when exotic animals escape or are released. 

The VHS supports a science-based “positive list” approach, in which species would only be permitted to be kept as pets after being assessed, using a scoring tool like EMODE, as suitable based on factors such as animal welfare, health, public safety, and environmental considerations.

Local governments can use local bylaws and licensing tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals. For example, the City of Castlegar’s Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw includes provisions addressing exotic pets, animal performance, exhibition, and display.

Mayor Candidate responses

Melissa Granum

Thank you for reaching out and for the important work the Vancouver Humane Society does to protect animals and raise awareness about their welfare.

Our much-loved pets have been featured throughout Delta First’s social media campaign. They are part of our families, and we recognize the companionship and joy animals bring to our community.

We appreciate your organization’s work to ensure their welfare receives thoughtful attention.

On your questions:

Mobile live animal programs: The animal-welfare and public-health concerns you have raised deserve careful consideration. I am not taking a position on a blanket prohibition at this time. If elected, I would support reviewing Delta’s approach, with input from animal-welfare and public-health experts, to understand whether additional safeguards or restrictions are needed.

Exotic animals as pets: I recognize the importance of ensuring that animals receive appropriate care and that public safety and our local environment are protected. I would be open to considering stronger local regulation, including learning more about a science-based positive list and licensing options.

Before endorsing a particular approach, I would want to understand Delta’s existing rules, the evidence supporting proposed changes, and how those changes would work in practice. Delta First believes in listening, making informed decisions and being clear with residents about our commitments.

While I cannot endorse the specific measures proposed without further review, I take these concerns seriously and value the Vancouver Humane Society’s contribution to that discussion.

Thank you for giving candidates the opportunity to address these issues and helping residents make informed choices.

If elected, we are excited about working with you and the Vancouver Humane Society as we head into the future.

Council Candidate responses

Gillian McLeod

1. I would not restrict or prohibit live animal programs

2. I would work with people who have animals and those around where they are placed to find out if they are accepted. IF Not I would work with many ways to keep the animals safe if they need to be moved.

3. I would support strengthening local regularion of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets.

4. I would work with family members and mayor and council and community to support the lives of exotic animals even if they need to be moved.

Nanaimo

The VHS asked candidates in Nanaimo the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Nanaimo? “

Background provided to candidates

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. They often include a wide range of species, ranging from farmed animals like goats, lambs, and chicks, to wild, exotic species like snakes, lizards, tortoises, and sugar gliders. They can include travelling petting zoos, animal presentations at schools and birthday parties, animal displays at community events, and reptile or exotic pet expos.

These programs can expose animals to frequent transportation, repeated public handling, unfamiliar environments, temporary or undersized enclosures, noise and other stressful conditions, often with limited or no opportunity to retreat from public view or engage in natural behaviours. And because healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella, the risks reach people too, especially young children, older adults, and pregnant people. Many examples of disease outbreaks in connection to mobile live animal programs have been documented in recent years.

The VHS believes local governments can play an important role in determining whether and where MLAPs are permitted to operate. For example, the City of Port Moody has adopted a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.

“Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?“

Background provided to candidates

Many MLAPs feature exotic animals (wild animals native to countries outside Canada) such as snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders. These animals have complex behavioural, social, dietary, and environmental needs that can be extremely difficult to meet in private homes. The promotion and sale of exotic animals at MLAPs can also contribute to impulse purchases, animal surrender, and risks to native wildlife when exotic animals escape or are released. 

The VHS supports a science-based “positive list” approach, in which species would only be permitted to be kept as pets after being assessed, using a scoring tool like EMODE, as suitable based on factors such as animal welfare, health, public safety, and environmental considerations.

Local governments can use local bylaws and licensing tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals. For example, the City of Castlegar’s Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw includes provisions addressing exotic pets, animal performance, exhibition, and display.

Mayor Candidate responses

Brunie Brunie

I am a dog person meaning I always have a dog in my life. I advocate for more rights for dogs to go with their humans. I am absolutely against animals showcased in venues of any kind or to be in cages. As Mayor I would not allow animals to be treated disrespectfully.

Council Candidate responses

Ben Geselbracht

1. Mobile live animal programs: Yes, I would support restricting mobile live animal programs in Nanaimo. These programs cause animals to suffer unnecessarily and can spread disease to vulnerable people. I would support a motion being brought forward directing staff to report on options to restrict these programs, such as a corporate policy similar to Port Moody’s.

2. Would you support Exotic animals as pets restrictions: Yes. Exotic animals needs often can not be met in a private home, and impulse buys often lead to surrender, neglect or release into the community which causes issues with Native species. I support exploring a science-based positive list, using tools suggested such as EMODE, along with licensing and bylaw provisions similar to Castlegar’s.

If elected, I would support a motion being brought forward directing staff to review the City’s animal control bylaw with these tools in mind.

Paul Van Ryssel

Thank you for reaching out and for providing the background information on these issues.

At this stage of the campaign, I’m going to respectfully decline to complete the questionnaire. These are very specific policy questions, and I have not had the opportunity to properly examine Nanaimo’s existing regulations, the extent of any local concerns, the evidence surrounding the proposed approaches, or the potential enforcement and financial implications.

One of the commitments I’ve made throughout this campaign is not to take a position simply because I’m asked for one.

Before supporting new regulations, I would want to understand the problem we are trying to solve, the evidence, the alternatives, the cost and how we would measure whether the change was effective.

I appreciate the work your organization does and the information you’ve provided. If elected and these matters come before Council, I would approach them with that same process and would be very willing to hear from your organization as part of that discussion.

Thank you again for including me.

Angela Waldick

Thank you so much for reaching out and for giving candidates the opportunity to think through these issues.

I appreciate the work the Vancouver Humane Society does to bring animal welfare into the public conversation.

My approach to municipal government is to start with what we already have, understand where the gaps are, and then work collaboratively toward practical improvements. I don’t believe good policy should be written in a vacuum, especially when it involves animal welfare, public health, safety and environmental considerations.

Mobile live animal programs: I would support Council taking a closer look at how Nanaimo currently regulates mobile live animal programs and whether our existing framework is sufficient. Nanaimo already has an Animal Responsibility Bylaw, adopted in 2021 following a review of animal-control services, best-practice research, stakeholder input and public engagement.

It addresses areas including animal welfare, licensing, owner responsibilities and enforcement. I think it is reasonable to ask whether that framework has kept pace with the different types of mobile animal programs we see today.

If elected, I would support asking staff to review the current regulations and identify any gaps, including considerations around animal welfare, public health, public safety, environmental impacts, provincial jurisdiction and our actual ability to enforce any new requirements.

I would also want to learn from what other municipalities have done and hear from the people who work with animals and animal welfare every day. Depending on what that review shows, restrictions or prohibitions may be appropriate in some circumstances.

I would also want to make sure legitimate educational, conservation, agricultural and veterinary activities are considered appropriately.

Exotic animals as pets: I am also supportive of looking at whether Nanaimo’s existing regulations around exotic animals could be strengthened. I find the idea of a science-based positive list worth exploring, particularly if it can help ensure that animals being kept as pets are species whose welfare needs can realistically be met in a home environment.

I would want that conversation to look beyond simply whether an animal is considered “exotic.”

We should consider animal welfare, behavioural and environmental needs, public safety, disease risks, potential impacts on local eco-systems if animals escape or are released, and whether regulations can actually be enforced.

If elected, I would support asking staff to identify what Nanaimo already regulates, where there may be gaps, what authority the City has, and what additional licensing or regulatory tools might be appropriate.

I would also want that process to include veterinarians, animal-welfare organizations, public-health and environmental professionals, relevant Indigenous partners, animal owners and the broader community.

There is also an important jurisdictional piece. Municipal government has a role to play, but it is not the only level of government involved in animal regulation.

I would want Nanaimo’s approach to work within our legal authority and complement provincial requirements rather than simply duplicating them.

Most importantly, I want to be honest about what being a councillor actually means. If elected, I will have one seat at the table. I can bring an issue forward, ask questions, advocate for action and work with Council and staff, but meaningful policy changes require collaboration, evidence and the proper process.

Thank you again for reaching out and for including me in this conversation. I appreciate the opportunity to learn more about these concerns and to consider where Nanaimo may be able to strengthen the work it is already doing.

Meg Fyfe Watkins

Thanks so much for your email, and for the information about mobile live animal programs and the keeping of exotic animals in Nanaimo. I wasn’t aware of things like travelling petting zoos and animal presentations at schools or birthday parties in our city, so I appreciate you bringing it to my attention.

As someone who follows a principle of non-harming in my own life, it is very important to me that we are reducing harm to people, animals, and our planet wherever we can. I would like to look into this matter more to get a better understanding of how the science-based “positive list” approach would be applied to these travelling zoos and presentations, but I would absolutely like to see stronger regulations in place around animal welfare. If elected, I would support evidence-based approaches to these types of regulations.

Osooyos

The VHS asked candidates in Osoyoos the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support or oppose the continuation of harness horse racing at Desert Park Raceway in Osoyoos? “

Background provided to candidates

Harness horse racing at Fraser Downs Raceway in Surrey came to an end in 2025. In July 2026, plans were announced to establish Desert Park Raceway as a new harness racing venue.

The VHS has raised concerns about the welfare risks associated with horse racing, including injuries, fatalities, and broader welfare concerns, including coercive training and equipment, and what happens to horses after they are no longer used in racing.

Please briefly explain your position, including whether you would support the Town continuing to facilitate or provide resources to the racing operation and what action you would take if elected.

Mayor Candidate responses

Tom Shields

In 1961 I marched in a parade at the CNE in Toronto for Armed Forces Day as a high school cadet. To thank us, they gave us 1 minute with a fortune teller who told me, “She saw a horse in my future, lots of horses, American and Canadian horses and a long way from Toronto. She also said I would be in a position of authority and would do well.” There was more but time was up and I would marry a girl whose last name started with a ‘Z’.

That was first as I married Eva Maria Zipper on August 11, 1969. I arrived in Osoyoos in 1978 to broadcast the local news and sports on the radio there and immediately got involved with Desert Park Race Track as the track announcer for the next 15 years. I sounded very much like Darryl Wells. I was also the mayor for 3 terms before now and it has been almost 25 years since I was the mayor, howefver I am known as I brought Bryan Adams amd 30,000 people to Desert Park, plus I have brought the Righteous Brothers, BTO. Tom Cochrane and others to Osoyoos. I am totally supportive of the SPCA and have had my picture in newpapers in Midland Ontario in the 1970s for getting a truckload of food for the SPCA through my radio shows and the same out here.

Desert Park is now used for harness racing: a sport governed by rules, just like Thoroughbred and Quarter horse racing. Hockey, baseball, football all have rules yet deaths have occurred in all of those sports. Desert Park is no longer a location for big concerts due to the residential area that now exists across the street plus a lack of parking. When visitors come to Osoyoos, they want to be near, on, or in Lake Osoyoos which takes these events away from the racing track and harness racing with off-track betting has a chance of survival in an industry that casino betting has weakened threatening the continued existence of betting on horses.

As a mayor who has been involved at that location since 1980, continuing down this road is the way to go. It also keeps stables available in case fires require horses to be evacuated from other parts of the province. This really is no different than police expecting us to obey the rules of the road and I expect the racing concerns to be addressed by those producing the races. I have produced large and small concerts including production and emcee work with Red Robinson in Memphis for the 25th anniversary of Elvis’s death in 2002.

The same thing occurs at race time: ‘someone’ is producing the event and that person ensures all rules are followed. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.

I should also add that I am in the Sports Hall of Fame for broadcasting hockey and baseball half a century ago in Ontario, and I was a news director with excellent ratings in Ontario and B.C.

Council Candidate responses

Bridget Wilson

While I appreciate the VHS’s concerns regarding the welfare risks associated with horse racing, research shows that Standardbreds (harness horses) generally experience lower on-track fatality rates compared to Thoroughbreds due to more gradual training methods.

However, intense competition at higher levels still carries risk, which is why Veterinary Technicians must remain present at these races to assist with health monitoring, regulatory compliance, and medical checks.

Generally, I am in favour of harness racing at Desert Park because it brings significant tourism and economic activity to the South Okanagan. These events draw visitors to local businesses, hotels, and restaurants during the shoulder season, which Osoyoos greatly needs. Furthermore, horse racing has deep historical ties to many British Columbia communities. Revitalizing the sport utilizes existing facilities for a unique public attraction while preserving agricultural livelihoods—including grooms, trainers, drivers, and feed suppliers.

Therefore, I support the Town of Osoyoos continuing to facilitate the racing operation, provided it is done with enhanced safety measures. If elected, I would propose to reduce the scheduled number of harness racing events from 22 down to 15, and advocate for reducing the number of horses racing side-by-side from 5 down to 3. This will actively reduce track congestion, lower the risk of collisions, and ensure a safer environment for both the horses and their drivers.

Surrey

The VHS asked candidates in Surrey the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Surrey, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”

Background provided to candidates

The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.

At the 2026 Cloverdale rodeo, a horse and rider fell and were injured during a bucking event.

Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.

Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.

Mayor Candidate responses

No response received yet.

The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.

If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.

You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.

→ Explore the election guide and contact your local candidates

Council Candidate responses

Isaac Daniel

Thank you for reaching out and for the Vancouver Humane Society’s continued advocacy for animal welfare, humane treatment, and responsible municipal governance.

Yes, I support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, equipment, and handling practices that subject animals to avoidable pain, fear, distress, or risk of injury.

Tradition, entertainment, and commercial interests should not be regarded as sufficient justification for practices that compromise animal welfare. A community’s values are reflected not only in the protections it extends to people, but also in the standards it establishes for the treatment of animals within its jurisdiction.

The reported incident at the 2026 Cloverdale rodeo, in which a horse and rider fell and were injured during a bucking event, underscores the importance of examining the risks associated with these activities.

One incident alone cannot establish the overall incidence of injury across rodeos; nevertheless, it reinforces the need for evidence-based safeguards and a serious assessment of whether particular events and practices are compatible with contemporary animal-welfare standards.

If elected, I would support pursuing municipal restrictions to prohibit rodeo events and practices that involve the deliberate infliction of avoidable distress or unacceptable risks to animal welfare, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events where the evidence demonstrates that the practices cannot be conducted humanely.

I would also support prohibiting electric prods, flank straps used to induce bucking, the pulling or twisting of ears and tails, neck twisting, and the hitting, kicking, or shoving of animals as described in your questionnaire.

My approach would be grounded in prevention, enforceability, and accountability—not merely expressions of concern after an animal has been injured.

Specifically, I would advocate for the following measures:

1. Municipal restrictions and enforceable conditions: Review Surrey’s authority to prohibit specified events and practices or impose enforceable animal-welfare conditions on rodeos and similar events held within municipal jurisdiction.

2. Evidence-based animal-welfare standards: Seek input from qualified veterinarians, animal-welfare organizations, event operators, and relevant regulatory authorities to establish clear requirements grounded in veterinary evidence and the prevention of avoidable suffering.

3. Permitting, monitoring, and enforcement: Support appropriate permit conditions, independent oversight, incident reporting, and meaningful consequences for violations, subject to municipal authority and applicable provincial law.

4. Responsible use of public resources: Support reviewing municipal funding, grants, promotional assistance, and other forms of public support for rodeo events to ensure that public resources do not subsidize activities involving prohibited or demonstrably inhumane practices.

5. Transparent public accountability: Advocate for publicly accessible reporting on animal-welfare requirements, reported incidents, enforcement measures, and compliance outcomes. Municipal action must be legally sound, proportionate, and practically enforceable.

I would therefore work with Surrey’s legal and regulatory teams to identify the strongest available mechanisms for implementing these protections while ensuring that municipal bylaws and permit conditions remain consistent with provincial legislation. Ultimately, animal welfare must be treated as a substantive public responsibility rather than a secondary consideration subordinate to entertainment or tradition.

Where an activity depends on practices that inflict avoidable suffering, the appropriate response is to restrict or prohibit those practices—not to presume that their historical existence makes them acceptable.

Thank you for including this important issue in your 2026 local election questionnaire.

I welcome the opportunity to have this position shared with VHS supporters and the wider Surrey community.

Youssef Khattab

I do support prohibiting inhumane events, tools and practices to all animals. I do not mind to: Sign a petition at the Surrey Council, Lobby with provincial MLS to enforce stricter animal cruelty regulations, Engage with event organizers to encourage the voluntary removal of high risk roping and wrestling segments.

Vik Uppal

Thank you for reaching out and for your work advocating for animal welfare.

I support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and handling practices in Surrey. Community traditions should evolve to ensure animals are treated humanely. Entertainment should never depend on causing animals fear, pain, or distress.

If elected, I would bring forward a motion requesting a staff report on enforceable restrictions, informed by independent veterinary and animal welfare expertise.

This would include prohibiting roping, wrestling, and bucking events that cause animal suffering, along with electric prods, flank straps, and the abusive handling practices listed in your questionnaire.

I would also support making humane treatment a condition of municipal permits, use of City facilities, funding, and other City support, with clear monitoring and consequences for violations. Public funding should support humane community celebrations and activities.

As an independent candidate, I am committed to listening to residents, examining the evidence, and speaking up for responsible decisions at City Hall.

Donna Wu

Thank you to the Vancouver Humane Society for raising this important issue.

I support strong and enforceable animal welfare standards for events held in Surrey. Animals should not be subjected to unnecessary pain, fear, stress, or injury for entertainment.

If elected, I would support prohibiting inhumane rodeo practices within Surrey, including the use of electric prods and other harmful tools, as well as forcible practices such as ear or tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving. I would also support appropriate restrictions on rodeo events where the activity itself creates an unreasonable risk of pain, distress, or injury to animals.

Municipal approval and permitting should include clear animal welfare, safety, and compliance requirements, with appropriate monitoring and enforcement. I would also support reviewing municipal funding or other forms of support to ensure that public resources are not used to facilitate activities involving inhumane treatment of animals.

As a city councillor, I would work with animal welfare organizations, event organizers, veterinarians, and relevant authorities to establish practical, transparent, and enforceable standards for events held in Surrey.

Thank you for your advocacy and for giving candidates an opportunity to address this important community issue.

Vancouver

The VHS asked candidates in Vancouver the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support or oppose efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park?”

Background provided to candidates

Horse racing at Vancouver’s Hastings Racecourse ended in December 2025 following the provincial government’s decision to end public funding for the industry.

This followed years of declining attendance, revenue and race days, increasing reliance on public subsidies, and ongoing horse welfare concerns. The VHS highlighted these issues, including a horse fatality rate at Hastings that was marked higher than the North American industry average, in its June 2025 report.

Despite the end of racing, the horse racing industry is actively pursuing its return to Hastings Park.

“Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Vancouver?”

Background provided to candidates

Vancouver permits horse-drawn carriages to operate in busy urban environments, where horses are exposed to vehicle traffic, noise, pollution, hard surfaces and unpredictable conditions. The VHS has raised concerns about the resulting risks to both horse welfare and public safety.

The VHS has documented carriages operating close to moving vehicles and turning across oncoming traffic at holiday events in busy commercial areas like Kerrisdale, Yaletown, and on Commercial Drive. The VHS has also observed horses displaying potential signs of stress or agitation, including head shaking, bit chewing, and pawing. and pawing.

In recent years, incidents have occurred in Vancouver, Victoria, and Montreal involving carriage horses becoming spooked, falling, or colliding with vehicles, sometimes resulting in injuries to the animals or passengers. Such incidents demonstrate how quickly situations can become unsafe for both animals and people. Cities like Montreal, Chicago, and Salt Lake City have already banned or restricted horse-drawn carriages over similar concerns.

Mayor Candidate responses

Muhammad Ahmad

Thank you for inviting me to respond. As an animal lover and humanitarian who has worked with WWF, I believe animal welfare and public safety deserve serious consideration in City decisions.

1. Horse-drawn carriages on busy city streets Yes. I support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets in Vancouver. Horses should not be exposed to dangerous traffic conditions, and the public should not face avoidable safety risks. If elected, I would ask City staff to review current rules and bring forward changes to restrict carriage operations on high-traffic routes.

2. Horse racing at Hastings Park I oppose efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park. Given the end of public funding and the animal welfare concerns raised about the industry, I would not support bringing racing back to the site.

I would work with the Park Board, community groups and other partners on uses for Hastings Park that serve Vancouver residents without relying on horse racing.

Scott Gilbert

Yes. I support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic Vancouver streets. Mixing horses with dense vehicle traffic, noise, hard surfaces and unpredictable urban conditions creates avoidable risks for animals, passengers and the public. If elected, I would ask staff to bring forward an enforceable bylaw that bars commercial horse-drawn carriages from high-traffic streets, supported by clear route definitions, animal-welfare standards and a reasonable transition period. Any narrowly defined exception for a controlled ceremonial event should require a closed or protected route, veterinary safeguards, weather limits and an emergency plan—not ordinary operation in live traffic.

I oppose reinstating horse racing at Hastings Park. The combination of documented animal-welfare concerns, declining attendance and revenue, and dependence on public subsidy does not justify reviving the industry on City-owned land. If elected, I would oppose City funding or a new lease intended to restore racing and would support a transparent, public process to plan a safer and financially responsible future for Hastings Park, including community, recreation, cultural and green-space uses. Any interim site decisions should include meaningful consultation with workers, neighbouring communities and Indigenous partners.

Council Candidate responses

Iona Bonamis

OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.

OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.

We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.

Bridget Burns

Horses are living animals, not props for entertainment, and they shouldn’t have to navigate congested streets alongside cars, buses, cyclists and unpredictable urban traffic. We have a responsibility to protect both animal welfare and public safety.

If elected, I would push for a review of the current permitting system, stronger restrictions on where carriages can operate, and ultimately a prohibition on operating in high-traffic areas. Vancouver can celebrate its traditions and create memorable experiences without putting animals or people at unnecessary risk.

The industry has had years to demonstrate that it can operate sustainably and responsibly, and the declining attendance, growing reliance on public subsidies, and serious horse welfare concerns make a strong case for moving on. Horses should not be put at risk to sustain an industry that is no longer financially viable.

If elected, I would oppose any use of public funds to revive horse racing and work with the Park Board and other levels of government to ensure Hastings Park is developed as a welcoming public space that serves the community, protects animals, and creates opportunities for recreation, culture and green space.

Frances Bula

OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.

OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.

We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.

David Grewal

Typically on issues like this I would need a lot more information.

Current elected officials often receive briefings and reports from city staff on specific issues of concern. Making an informed decision is important.

As an elected official that would mean speaking with stakeholders, understanding the problem or dangers posed, exploring alternatives or mitigative measures, receiving city staff data and report, etc.

I’m not trying to not answer your questions but it wouldn’t be wise of me to provide an opinion on any issue unless I have more than a short email of information and no engagement with stakeholders to fully understand what I am forming an opinion on.

I would do similar on any important issue.
Thank you for reaching out to me.

Jarrett Hagglund

OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.

OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.

We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.

Lucy Maloney

OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.

OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.

We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.

Stephanie Smith

Thanks for getting in touch. I don’t believe that there should be horse carriages on busy, high-traffic streets and I would commit to finding a legislative or regulatory path to prohibit it.

I would also oppose returning horse racing to Hastings Park. The problems with Hastings Park racing were long-standing, and the information in the report that you attached unfortunately doesn’t surprise me.

I also don’t think it would be feasible even if someone at the city were to champion it. Site conditions were already substandard and the backstretch has since been dismantled. It’s not viable and we should move on to other ideas for the site.

Caitlin Stockwell

OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.

OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.

We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.

Parris J. Williams

I would support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Vancouver. Safety should be a priority for everyone, including the horses themselves. Busy urban environments present potential risks due to vehicle traffic, noise, and unpredictable conditions. I believe we should look at ways to protect both animal welfare and public safety, and I would support exploring appropriate restrictions through City policy.

Personally, I am not in favour of horse racing returning to Hastings Park. However, I believe decisions of this nature should be informed by evidence, animal welfare standards, and community feedback. Before considering any potential return, I would want to understand what safeguards would be required, how they would be monitored and enforced, and what the implications would be for the horses and the community.

If elected, I would listen to residents and relevant experts, review the available evidence, and consider whether a clear, enforceable plan could adequately address animal welfare concerns before determining how to proceed.

“Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating in Stanley Park?”

Background provided to candidates

Horse-drawn carriages operate in Stanley Park, exposing horses to busy and unpredictable urban conditions. The VHS has raised concerns about the resulting risks to horse welfare and public safety.

In 2016, horses pulling a carriage full of tourists through Stanley Park were spooked by traffic. The frightened animals bolted off the roadway, crossing a bike path and smashing a park bench before nearly taking the carriage over the seawall. Fortunately, no horses or people were seriously hurt, but the incident demonstrates how quickly this situation can become unsafe for both animals and people.

In recent years, incidents have occurred elsewhere, including in Victoria and Montreal, involving carriage horses becoming spooked, falling, or colliding with vehicles, sometimes resulting in injuries to the animals or passengers. Cities like Montreal, Chicago, and Salt Lake City have already banned or restricted horse-drawn carriages over similar concerns.

Park Board candidate responses

Sacia Burton

I am in favour of exploring a well-managed end to the horse-drawn carriages in Stanley Park. Given the increased summer temperatures we have been experiencing in BC, it is unsafe for the animals (and for nearby people) to be waiting and operating on pavement during the summer months.

Further, as you referenced, moments when the horses are startled pose an unnecessary risk to park patrons and to the horses’ well-being. I would want to ensure that the horses are able to be retired in an ethical way, and to work alongside the business owner for a timely and appropriate wind-down of operations.

Given the possibility of introducing Neighbourhood Zero Emission Vehicles to continue park tours humanely, it feels appropriate and timely to make this decision before any further threats to safety or wellbeing emerge.

Jon Girard

I think it’s absolutely ridiculous that there’s still horse drawn carriages in Stanley Park. It’s a lose lose. Cruelty to the animals that shouldn’t be forced to work AND was one of the reasons the bike lane’s got removed as well if I recall correctly since people complained “it held up traffic too much” with one lane (separate issue but we also need more bike lanes, I digress).

Breanne Smart

Thank you for reaching out to me as this is an issue that is close to my heart. As a vegan and animal rights advocate for the past decade, the use of animals for profit and entertainment is not something I support.

While the horse drawn carriages are a beloved institution of Stanley Park, it would be my responsibility as a Park Board Commissioner to move forward a motion to financially support Stanley Park Horse Drawn Tours in the transition to electrify their fleet and remove the use of animals in their business.

Thank you very much for all of the work that the VHS does, and for taking the time to send this question to candidates.

I look forward to everyone’s responses.

Tamiko Suzuki

Yes I would support prohibiting horse drawn carriages from operating in Stanley Park for all the reasons you have listed. I’ve always felt concern for the horses having to work on concrete all day, having to pull the carriage up that steep hill towards Prospect Point, and having cars and bikes pass fairly closely.

Victoria

The VHS asked candidates in Victoria the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.

“Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Victoria? “

Background provided to candidates

The City of Victoria permits horse-drawn sightseeing carriages to operate on city streets. Horse carriages in Victoria operate in an urban environment alongside cars, buses, bicycles, pedestrians and other traffic. This exposes horses to vehicle noise, traffic congestion, hard road surfaces and unpredictable situations that can create risks to both animal welfare and public safety.

Victoria has also experienced multiple incidents demonstrating how quickly these risks can escalate.

In 2018, a horse-drawn carriage in downtown Victoria was bumped by a bus, causing both horses to fall onto the roadway. In 2023, a spooked carriage horse fled for several blocks before falling near a bike lane, resulting in injuries to the horse and driver. More recently, in April 2024, a carriage horse became spooked at an intersection. The driver lost control and passengers jumped out of the carriage before the horse collapsed on the ground. Cities like Montreal, Chicago, and Salt Lake City have already banned or restricted horse-drawn carriages over similar concerns.

Mayor Candidate responses

Mike Harris

Thank you for reaching out and providing the opportunity to share my position on horse-drawn carriages in Victoria.

I recognize the importance of animal welfare and public safety, and I appreciate the concerns raised by the Vancouver Humane Society.

Horse-drawn carriages have been a longstanding part of Victoria’s heritage and tourism industry. I support their continued operation, provided that strong animal welfare and public safety standards are maintained and properly enforced.

I do not support a blanket prohibition on horse-drawn carriages operating on Victoria’s streets. However, I recognize that certain high-traffic areas may present additional challenges, and I believe any legitimate safety concerns deserve careful consideration.

If elected Mayor, I would support reviewing existing operating regulations, traffic safety requirements and enforcement practices to ensure they adequately protect horses, carriage operators, passengers and other road users.

Where evidence demonstrates that particular routes or operating conditions create unacceptable safety risks, I would support considering reasonable adjustments, including route restrictions where warranted.

I also believe carriage operators must be held accountable for complying with animal welfare requirements and municipal bylaws. Complaints and reported incidents should be taken seriously, investigated appropriately and addressed through consistent enforcement.

My approach would be to preserve this longstanding Victoria tradition while ensuring that animal welfare and public safety remain priorities. I believe we can achieve both through responsible oversight, meaningful consultation and evidence-based decisions rather than an outright ban.

David Johnston

I will be proposing an outright ban on the horse-drawn carriages as horses are people and to condemn them to slavery is abominable.

Bruce McGuigan

Thank you for reaching out and sharing your concerns regarding horse-drawn carriages in Victoria.

The campaign has received a number of concerns regarding the operation of these tours and the condition of the horses, which warrants a thorough review. Given the importance of both animal wellbeing and community safety, I believe it would be premature to announce a definitive position while outside of office, absent such a review.

I am currently evaluating the option of not renewing the existing permit, though I remain deeply concerned about the welfare of the horses if that were to occur. My priority is to look at this issue carefully, ideally with the assistance of the SPCA, to ensure any path forward is both responsible and humane.

Thank you for the work you do and for the opportunity to share my perspective on this matter.

Gregoor Miller (Gregory Miller)

Your point of view depends on where you are coming from.

In New York City tourists really like taking a carriage ride through Central Park. The locals do not. Are the animals fairly treated?

If the carriages are not allowed on busy streets, is Beacon Hill Park enough?

Yes, it is frustrating behind one in James Bay. However the way streets are in Victoria now, it is not much different.

I feel it is a question for the Humane Society to answer, not some politician. Whatever choice the Humane Society makes, I will enforce it.

Council Candidate responses

Wendy Bowkett

Thank you for inviting my response. Animal welfare and public safety should guide the City’s approach to horse-drawn carriages.

I would support restricting their operation on streets where an evidence-based assessment identifies risks that cannot be adequately addressed.

If elected, I would seek a review of permitted routes, traffic conditions, incident records and operating standards, informed by independent equine-welfare expertise and consultation with residents and operators.

Where that review demonstrates unacceptable risks, I would support prohibiting carriage operations on those routes.

Jerry Garcia

You bring up an excellent and important topic that has come up in door-knocking discussions and meetings with residents.

Yes. I support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from busy, high-traffic streets where horses must operate beside buses, trucks, cars, bicycles and pedestrians. The incidents described are not abstract. They show that one collision, sudden noise or unexpected movement can injure a horse, driver, passenger or other road user. Tradition cannot outweigh a preventable safety risk.

If elected, within my first 90 days I would ask Council to direct staff to amend the Vehicles for Hire Bylaw. The review should identify restricted streets and intersections using objective criteria: traffic volume and speed, transit activity, bike-lane conflicts, construction, road width, and collision or incident history.

It should include the Vancouver Humane Society, animal welfare and veterinary experts, carriage operators, VicPD, transportation staff and affected neighbourhoods. I would also request immediate interim safety options available under the City’s existing licensing authority, mandatory reporting of every carriage-related incident, and annual public reporting.

The result should be enforceable route restrictions, not voluntary guidelines. Operators should receive a defined transition period and an opportunity to move to safer routes or alternatives such as electric heritage style vehicles. The timetable must protect animals and the public, not preserve the status quo indefinitely.

Victoria can preserve heritage tourism without exposing horses and people to unnecessary risk. This is a practical, balanced step the City can take, and I would support it.

Martin Girard

I’ve already committed to a ban on horse carriages. I say it is an anachronistic practice and would see it ended in favour of pedicab services already in place. I’m already aware that horse carriages have caused several accidents over the years and raised legitimate concerns about animal welfare, including operation during heat waves. I would simply refuse to renew the permit once it expires.

James Harasymow

This is my fourth time running. And to be honest, my opinion has changed recently thanks to some conversations that I had recently a greeting meet this year. Here are your answers.

Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Victoria?

yes.

Please briefly explain your position and what action you would take if elected.

I believe we should set up a permanent plan to phase out horse drawn carriages from the city of Victoria.

We should vote this through immediately as I know it will take a few years to allow the horses to live out there lifespan doing what they were bred to do. Sooner the better.

Jason Heit

Thank you for reaching out and for providing this information. I appreciate the work the Vancouver Humane Society does to advocate for animal welfare. Animal welfare and public safety are both important considerations, and I certainly recognize the concerns you’ve raised regarding horse-drawn carriages operating in busy urban environments.

However, I don’t believe in making decisions without first having a thorough understanding of all the facts and potential consequences. Before taking a position on prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from certain streets, I would want to better understand several factors, including the health and welfare of the horses, existing safety regulations, the frequency and circumstances of incidents, and whether additional safeguards could effectively address the concerns.

I would also want to understand the economic impact on the operators, employees and Victoria’s tourism industry, as well as what would happen to the horses if restrictions significantly affected or ended these operations.

I believe it’s important to hear from animal welfare organizations, veterinarians, carriage operators, employees and other affected parties before making a decision. If elected, I would support a comprehensive review of the issue, including current animal welfare standards, safety records, economic implications and potential alternatives.

I am not opposed to change when there is evidence that change is necessary. However, I believe decisions should be based on facts, consultation and a clear understanding of the consequences rather than committing to a particular outcome before that work has been done.

Thank you again for the opportunity to respond.

Arthur McInnis (Joel Arthur McInnis)

I have not yet taken a position on prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets. Through your work with the Humane Society, you are close to this issue and may have strong views. I would be very open to hearing more from you about the current standards.

As a candidate, I want to hear the relevant issues and understand who would be affected, including the animals. Animal welfare is at the core of this issue. If elected, I would listen to the people of Victoria and vote according to what they tell me is important to them.

You can make animal welfare part of the conversation about the future of our communities!

On October 17, 2026, voters across B.C. will head to the polls to elect mayors, councillors, regional representatives and school trustees.

While local elections may focus on issues like housing, transportation, parks, and community safety, there is another important issue that deserves a place on the ballot: animal welfare.

That means voters have an important opportunity to ask: “What will you do to make our communities safer and more compassionate for animals?”

Check out the guide! →

Share this post with others!

Authorized by Vancouver Humane Society, registered sponsor under LECFA, (604) 266-9744 

Categories
News/Blog

Find unique gifts & help animals at the VHS’s online auction

Join the VHS for an exciting online auction this fall!

Check out the incredible items available to bid on in the online auction, all generously donated by supporting businesses and individuals.

Some of the incredible items donated by local businesses

The auction will run from October 15-25.

There’s something for everyone in the auction, including: exciting experiences, cruelty-free clothing and accessories, and delicious plant-based food and treats! The online auction is the perfect place to purchase unique holiday gifts for loved ones or to treat yourself to something special, and all for a good cause.

New items are being added each day so be sure to check back!

Browse available items

Here’s how to register to start bidding!

1. Head to the VHS BiddingOwl auction site.

2. Select ‘Bidder Login” in the top right of the page:

3. Enter your email address to see if you already have an account.

4. Log in or follow the instructions to create an account.

Get started

This year’s auction aims to raise more than $12,000 and we can’t do it without you! All proceeds from the auction will go towards the VHS’ work to advocate for animals.

Learn more about the VHS’s programs and advocacy work to see how your purchase at the auction helps animals.

The VHS is so grateful to the following businesses and individuals that are supporting the online auction:

  • 4Cats
  • Arts Club Theatre Company
  • Ashley O’Mara Art
  • Barrington Brolly
  • B Fit Personal Training
  • Birch Street Studio
  • Bonus Bakery
  • BLIM
  • BReD
  • Carol Dingee
  • Clani Clay Designs
  • Cindy Whitehead Psychic Medium
  • Core Community
  • Darcy Matheson
  • Designs for you
  • Dilly Dally Kids
  • Earnest Ice Cream
  • Elena Markelova Art
  • Erin Smithson
  • Eva Taylor Art
  • Formula Fig
  • Fox & Oak
  • Ink by Paula
  • Ivyc Designs
  • Kitsilano Smiles
  • Level V Bakery
  • Lone Tree Cider
  • MAKE Vancouver
  • Meet
  • Mikel Grant Jewellery
  • Millsie
  • Moon Prism Pottery
  • My Bougie Bottle
  • Oddity Kombucha
  • Oi Naturals & Co.
  • Organika
  • Plant Curious
  • Scott Hardy

  • Shelley Tetz
  • Shirley Hintz
  • Sprouted Oven
  • Sriracha Revolver
  • TableTutors
  • The Cultch
  • The Grinning Goat
  • The Hive
  • The Improv Centre
  • The Outdoor Learning School and Store
  • The Pie Hole
  • Vancouver Art Gallery
  • Vancouver Water Adventures
  • VanDusen Botanical Garden
  • Vegan Supply
  • Workshop Performance Clinic
  • Zimt

Categories
News/Blog

Mobile Live Animal Programs: What Are the Risks?

What does a bearded dragon passed from child to child at a birthday party, a snake in a small plastic container for sale at a reptile expo, and a sloth being fed carrots by children in a crowded attraction, all have in common?

They are all examples of mobile live animal programs, or MLAPs, where animals are brought to events to be displayed, handled or sold.

They can look like harmless fun. But for the animals, they often mean frequent travel to unfamiliar environments, hours of being on display and handled by strangers, and nowhere to hide.

And because healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella, the risks reach people too, especially young children, older adults, and pregnant people.

There is little oversight of these programs, and British Columbians are concerned. New polling found that strong majorities worry about the impacts on animal welfare, public health and safety, and the environment.

Learn more about the issues with MLAPs below and help raise awareness by sharing this information with your community.

Sign up to stay updated on this campaign and for opportunities to speak up.

Welfare
Health
Education
Environment

Share this post!

What are mobile live animal programs (MLAPs)?

MLAPs involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Travelling petting zoos and mobile farms at fairs, festivals, schools, and markets
  • Classroom, assisted living home, and birthday party animal presentations
  • Animal displays and attractions at shopping centres and community events
  • Reptile expos and other events where animals are sold to the public
A pair of bare hands holding a chameleon
Nanaimo, 2026

The animals involved range widely.

Some are domesticated, farmed animals such as goats, lambs, calves, rabbits, and chicks. Others are wild, exotic species such as snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders, which are non-domesticated animals native to countries outside Canada.

Unlike dogs, cats, or horses, these species have not been domesticated over thousands of years to live alongside people, and they retain their wild instincts and complex needs even when bred in captivity.

Across many different species, MLAPs share several factors that researchers have identified as increasing the risk of harm. These include young animals, temporary setups, frequent close contact between animals and people, large crowds, and audiences made up largely of young children.

A toad sitting a clear plastic container
Abbotsford, 2024
A lizard in a small plastic container with $200 written on the container
Abbotsford, 2026
Multiple children holding and petting a young bird
A large tortoise in small plastic container sitting on hay
Delta, 2023
A monitor lizard curled up in blue plastic bin
Nanaimo, 2023
A gecko in a small plastic container with leaves and paper towel
Abbotsford, 2026
A large yellow snake curled multiple times in a very small plastic enclosure.
Abbotsford, 2024
Four lizards swimming in a small, barren aquarium.
Nanaimo, 2026
One large monitor lizard in a barren enclosure
Abbotsford, 2026

The issues with MLAPs

Animal welfare

Animals used in MLAPs, especially exotic species, face significant welfare risks, including:

  • Frequent travel to and from events, sometimes over long distances
  • Repeated handling by members of the public
  • Undersized or barren enclosures during transport and display
  • Often no opportunities to retreat from public view or from the sight of other animals
  • Exposure to unnatural lighting, temperature, humidity, flooring and bedding, noise, and smells
  • Limited opportunities to engage in natural behaviours
  • Abnormal social groupings, such as highly social animals being housed alone
  • Largely unregulated housing and breeding outside of events, where the conditions animals live in may be unknown

The impact isn’t always easy to see.

A 2023 study of mobile zoos explains that an animal can appear calm while being handled and still be stressed, and that signs of stress in animals often promoted as docile, including some tortoises and bearded dragons, can go unnoticed.

Many MLAP’s invite people to touch or hold animals.

The study also warns that frequent transport and handling can mean repeated stress with little chance to recover, which can lead to chronic stress that harms an animal’s long-term health and welfare.

The Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries (GFAS), which sets standards for animal sanctuaries, opposes public contact with wildlife, including exotic species. GFAS says pay-to-play activities are never in an animal’s best interest, can put animal health and public safety at risk, and send the wrong message about wild and exotic animals.

A sign in front of a chameleon enclosure that says 'Get a picture magnet done with our chameleons'
Nanaimo, 2026
Children petting a porcupine in an open enclosure
Abbotsford, 2026
A hand touching the nose of a sheep over a fence with other animals in the background
A person petting a goat through fence bars
A person holding a large snake

The link between animal welfare and disease risk

The health and wellbeing of people and animals are often interconnected. Stress suppresses immune function and can increase how many pathogens an animal can shed. The Public Health Agency of Canada’s guidance on reptiles states this directly: stress in a reptile can increase Salmonella shedding.

The conditions described above, like frequent travel and repeated handling, are exactly those that can cause this kind of stress.

Research also shows that many reptiles and other animals hide signs of stress as a survival tactic.

An animal who appears calm may still be experiencing chronic stress with serious physical and psychological effects. Stressed animals are also more likely to bite or scratch, which compounds both injury and disease risk. Conditions that put animals at risk tend to be risky for the people around them too.

Better welfare standards helps protect animals and the public.

Public health and safety

Healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens that make people seriously ill, including strains of E. coli that can produce Shiga toxin, as well as Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Cryptosporidium. Children under five, pregnant people, older adults, and people with weakened immune systems face the highest risk of severe illness.

Recent examples include: 

North Carolina, Summer 2026

A mobile petting zoo operating out of Harmony, North Carolina took a group of baby goats to at least 10 venues across the state between late July and late August, including a community picnic, assisted living homes, a back-to-school event and private bookings.

Three of the goats later tested positive for rabies. Local health departments evaluated 284 people for possible exposure, and 213 were advised to begin post-exposure treatment.

One small group of animals travelled to roughly a dozen venues and came into contact with hundreds of people, including seniors in care and children at a school event, before anyone knew there was a problem.

Identifying and reaching everyone who may have been exposed then required a coordinated effort across multiple health departments, the state health agency and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One of the assisted living homes involved has since decided to stop hosting farmed animal visits.

Arizona State Fair, October 2025

Public health officials began investigating an E. coli outbreak after multiple children who visited the fair’s petting zoo were hospitalized.

A parent advocacy organization reported that at least four hospitalized children’s families said the children had petted a pig at the exhibit.

Some children developed a serious complication that attacks the kidneys.

Canada, October 2024

In October 2024, a Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) investigation into a Salmonella outbreak linked to geckos concluded that twenty-five confirmed cases were reported across seven provinces, including one in B.C., with four hospitalizations and one death.

Those affected ranged in age from one to 103. It was the second gecko-linked Salmonella outbreak PHAC reported that year. Notably, PHAC’s own guidance identifies birthday parties, schools, daycares, museums, science centres, zoos and travelling reptile shows as settings where this kind of exposure can occur.

PHAC has investigated similar outbreaks linked to snakes and feeder rodents, pet hedgehogs, bearded dragons and young poultry. Research published in 2025 found that reptile-associated Salmonella outbreaks in Canada are increasing alongside the growing popularity of reptiles as pets.

Isn’t good handwashing enough to manage the risk?

Handwashing matters, and nobody should stop doing it. But it often isn’t enough to combat all the other risk factors at MLAPs.

Between 2023 and 2025, one animal contact attraction in South West England had four separate outbreaks of Cryptosporidium, a parasite that causes severe stomach illness. Thirty-nine cases were confirmed by lab testing. When investigators looked into why this kept happening, they found germs lingering in the environment and a dangerous strain of E. coli on the surfaces people touch most, like railings and gates.

The striking part is that the site was following the standards it was supposed to follow. What kept the outbreaks going was the setup itself. Visitors walked right into the pens with the animals, and young children behaved the way they often do, touching all surfaces and putting their hands near their faces.

Hand sanitizer often isn’t enough to address the problem either. Alcohol gel does not reliably kill Cryptosporidium. An event that offers a sanitizer dispenser instead of soap and running water can leave people believing their hands are clean when they are not.

The same problems identified in this investigation often persist at most MLAPs: not enough places to thoroughly wash hands, no clear line between the animal areas and the animal-free ones, contaminants on shoes that are tracked onto walkways, and too few staff watching how children and animals interact.

Lack of educational benefit

MLAPs are often defended as hands-on learning experiences that build empathy and support for conservation.However, experts and academics do not support the claim that interacting with live animals in these settings increases conservation knowledge or action.

Some research suggests these experiences can produce negative emotional or intellectual perceptions of animals. Seeing animals removed from their environments, confined in small enclosures, and handled repeatedly can normalize the idea that animals exist for human use or entertainment.

Researchers note that seeing animals up close is not necessary to foster learning, care, or conservation. Many beloved species, such as humpback whales, enjoy strong public protection without ever being handled by the public.

A person holding a snake and showing to a group of children to touch
Nanaimo, 2026
A child touching a snake someone is holding out to them
Nanaimo, 2026
Children touching a hedgehog on a desk

Promotion of exotic pets

Hands-on encounters can also make exotic animals seem like suitable pets, especially to young children. A 2026 study found that even after hearing that tortoises make poor pets, children aged seven and eight were no less interested in owning one.

The researchers suggest that letting young children touch animals may encourage a desire for exotic pets. Rather than discouraging impulse purchases, close contact may unintentionally fuel demand within the exotic animal trade.

This matters because exotic animals, whether captive-bred or wild-caught, have complex social, behavioural, dietary, and environmental needs. These needs are difficult to meet in captivity and even harder to meet in private homes. When those needs aren’t met, animals may suffer chronic stress, illness, and premature death. Specialized veterinary care can also be hard to find and is expensive. As a result, animals may suffer or die without treatment or be abandoned or surrendered to already overburdened rescues.

Even well-intentioned guardians may not have the expertise or resources to properly care for exotic species. That’s why the VHS supports a science-based “positive list” framework. It would set out which species can be kept as pets based on welfare, health, safety, and environmental criteria. A species would be allowed to be kept only after being assessed as suitable.

A child holding a small tortoise with other children touching other animals in the background
A snake in a small plastic container next to a sign that reads 'Enter to win this beautiful snake!'
Nanaimo, 2024
Nine snakes displayed in small see-through plastic containers
Delta, 2023
A child sitting in a chair while holding a lizard
Abbotsford, 2026
Five snakes curled in small see-through plastic containers next to a sign that lists different payment methods
Abbotsford, 2024
Multiple geckos in clear plastic containers laid out across at table with various prices written on the containers
Abbotsford, 2024

Community & environmental impacts

The demand for exotic pets, fueled by MLAPs, can have environmental consequences. Exotic pets that escape, are released, or are surrendered add strain to shelters, rescues, and veterinary services. These services are already overwhelmed and may not have the resources or expertise to care for such a wide range of species.

There have been many documented cases of environmental impacts of escaped or released exotic pets in B.C. in recent years, including red-eared slider turtles. In summer 2025, for example, conservation officers and B.C. Parks staff cleared visitors and closed trails in Miracle Beach Provincial Park while searching for an escaped boa constrictor. The snake was then taken to the Comox Valley SPCA.

The mobile nature of MLAPs can make tracking health impacts difficult. Many people may recover from infections without seeing a doctor or getting tested, so outbreaks are likely under-reported. The 2023 study of mobile zoos adds that symptoms can be delayed or mistaken for common illnesses. As the authors point out, a lack of recorded cases doesn’t mean infections are rare.

Two monitor lizards in side-by-side plastic bins with 'Blackhead monitor pair $2500' written on one of the bins
Abbotsford, 2026

What about rescues?

Some MLAPs describe themselves as rescues that rely on events to raise funds for animal care. Funding challenges in animal care are real and should be taken seriously.

However, reputable sanctuaries and rescues consistently raise funds without placing animals in situations that cause stress or create disease risk.

Grants, animal sponsorship programs, online peer-to-peer fundraising, corporate partnerships and community events all offer fundraising alternatives.

Ethical rescues prioritize animal wellbeing and do not use animals for public handling or entertainment.

New polling shows strong public concern

Public concern surrounding mobile live animal programs is growing. In 2025, the Union of B.C. Municipalities, an organization that represents local governments across British Columbia, endorsed resolution NR75 calling on the B.C. Government to regulate mobile live animal programs, demonstrating that this issue matters to municipalities.

Polling* of British Columbians in 2026 found that:

  • 85% think there should be restrictions on bringing exotic animals into schools, childcare settings, or long-term care facilities, and;
  • a strong majority of British Columbians are concerned about the following issues associated with mobile live animal programs such as how the animals are captured or bred (83%), the welfare of the animals (79%), the risk to the environment if animals escape (74%), the risk of disease passing from animals to people (73%), and the risk to public safety (69%)

*Research Co. poll conducted for the Vancouver Humane Society August 30 to September 1, 2026 (n=806 B.C. residents, margin of error +/-3.5%, 19 times out of 20)

There are better ways to educate & inspire caring for animals

There are many alternatives to MLAPs that can build curiosity and compassion for animals without transporting them to parties, classrooms, and expos to be handled, displayed or sold.

Documentaries, virtual learning, visits to sanctuaries that prioritize animal wellbeing, and conservation programs all offer meaningful ways to engage and educate the public, without the risks to animals, people, and the environment.

Sign up to stay updated on this campaign and for opportunities to help raise awareness

Help us spread the word about the harms of mobile live animal programs.

Together, we can build a future where education and compassion never come at the expense of animal welfare or public health and safety.

The VHS is grateful to the Animal Welfare Foundation of Canada for their generous grant funding of our work to raise awareness about the suffering of wild, exotic animals kept in captivity as pets and used in mobile live animal programs. 

Categories
News/Blog

2026 Animal Welfare Election Guide

Use your voice to help animals this October with the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide

The Vancouver Humane Society (VHS) is encouraging voters to bring animal welfare into conversations with candidates in the lead-up to the 2026 local elections across British Columbia. 

Use the VHS Animal Welfare Election Guide to engage with your candidates and discover what they will do to make our communities safer and more compassionate for animals.

The VHS also contacted election candidates in key B.C. communities where current or ongoing animal welfare issues overlap with the VHS’s local advocacy work.

Candidates were asked questions about topics such as horse carriages, horse racing, rodeos, mobile live animal programs and exotic animals in captivity. Read their responses to learn where candidates in these communities stand on these important issues.

Get Started ↓
Sign up for FREE resources!
How it works
1. Explore animal welfare issues

Read through the key welfare issues and examples of local action.

2. Ask your candidates

Send a short, respectful message using the template below.

3. Share what you learn

Track responses and share what you discover with your community & VHS.

You can make animal welfare part of the conversation about the future of our communities

On October 17, 2026, voters across B.C. will head to the polls to elect mayors, councillors, regional representatives and school trustees.

While local elections may focus on issues like housing, transportation, parks, and community safety, there is another important issue that deserves a place on the ballot: animal welfare.

Across B.C., many local governments have already taken action on animal welfare issues. 

Some communities have introduced bylaws addressing animals used in entertainment, such as banning mobile live animal programs or rodeos, or have adopted policies that better protect companion animals, such as pet-friendly housing.

That means voters have an important opportunity to ask:
What will you do to make our communities safer and more compassionate for animals?
Read the key issues ↓
Contact your candidates ↓

A quick note:

B.C. is also holding a provincial election shortly after the local elections.

This guide is specifically for the local elections and the candidates running for local government and school boards. 

The VHS will continue engaging with the provincial government on animal welfare issues after the provincial election and sharing resources for VHS supporters to do the same.

Get election resources & updates delivered to your inbox!

A shareable graphic for social media that says "I'm speaking up for animals" with a picture of dog holding it's paw above a voting box.
A shareable graphic for social media that says "Pets are family" with a picture of a child and their dog cuddling on a pillow.
A shareable graphic for social media that says "Animals shouldn't suffer for entertainment" with a picture of a sad-looking horse being ridden in a rodeo.
A shareable graphic for social media that says "I'm speaking up for farmed animals & a more sustainable food system" with a picture of sheep eating grass.

1. Key animal welfare issues

Local governments make decisions every day that impact animals and the people who care about them. From bylaws regulating the use of animals in entertainment and pet ownership, to pet-friendly housing policies, parks management and local business regulations.

Some issues are especially relevant across B.C., while others have a particular connection to specific communities.

Choose an issue to see what local governments can do and questions you can ask your candidates.

Support a shift away from factory farming, toward a more plant-based food system with stronger protections for farmed animals

thousands of chickens next to images of wildfire and flood water
What local governments can do

Local governments can help create healthier, more sustainable communities through policies that support plant-based food choices, stronger emergency planning and disaster response for farmed animals, and a transition away from intensive factory farming toward more diverse, sustainable, and locally focused agriculture.

Similarly, school board trustees can support school district policies and practices that prioritize plant-based food access in schools.

Examples of local action
Food procurement & events

The City of Vancouver and the District of North Vancouver have incorporated plant-based food procurement policies.

Emergency planning

The Squamish-Lillooet Regional District has adopted a comprehensive Agriculture Emergency Plan that includes a Commercial Livestock Relocation Guide and emergency support protocols.  

Want to strengthen your message? Copy one of the examples above to show your candidate what other local governments are already doing.

Read more about this issue

Plant-based food advocacy →

Emergency response planning for farmed animals →

Questions to ask candidates

Use or adapt these questions to start the conversation with candidates at the local government and school trustee level:

Would you support practices, plans, and policies that increase the availability of sustainable plant-based foods, while reducing reliance on products from intensive animal agriculture?
Would you advocate to the provincial and federal governments for policies and investments that facilitate a transition toward healthy, humane, and sustainable plant-based food systems and away from intensive animal agriculture

—and, if so, what specific measures would you support?
Would you support updating local emergency and disaster plans to make sure farmed animals are included and plans are required for their evacuation, shelter, and care?
Contact your candidates now ↓
Share about this issue
A shareable graphic for social media that says "I'm speaking up for farmed animals & a more sustainable food system" with a picture of sheep eating grass.
To download: right click + save image as
"This election, I’m asking candidates what they will do to support policies that help protect farmed animals and make plant-based choices more accessible in our communities."
Send these resources to your email→

Support a shift away from entertainment that puts animals at risk toward humane, animal-free alternatives

A group of animal activists protesting outside of the Calgary Stampede asking for kinder events for animals.
What local governments can do

Animals should not be put at risk or subjected to fear, stress or suffering for entertainment. Local governments can take meaningful action towards protecting animals by prohibiting harmful events or activities at the community level.

Rodeos

Determine whether inhumane rodeo events or activities, such as roping, wrestling, and bucking events, are allowed to operate within the community or are supported financially through local policies and programs.

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs)

Determine whether MLAPs, such as exotic pet expos, travelling petting zoos, animal displays, and presentations, are allowed to operate. MLAPs increase the risks of zoonotic disease spread, cause animals unnecessary stress and risk of injury, and can contribute to environmental concerns if an exotic animal escapes.

Horse racing

Prohibit horse racing in communities where the horse racing industry is trying to revive the sport, particularly in Vancouver, the Lower Mainland, the Fraser Valley, and Osoyoos.

Horse carriages

Prohibit the operation of horse carriages on busy, urban streets in communities where carriage rides operate, particularly in Victoria and Vancouver.

Examples of local action​

Animals in entertainment

The City of Vancouver, the District of North Vancouver, and Port Moody have all prohibited rodeo activities.

Exotic animals

Castlegar introduced bylaws and licensing tools using a positive list of animals to regulate which are allowed to be kept in the community and under what circumstance.

Mobile live animal programs

Port Moody passed a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.

Want to strengthen your message? Copy one of the examples above to show your candidate what other local governments are already doing.

Read more on this issue

B.C. rodeos→

Exotic pets→

The horse racing industry →

The horse carriage industry→

Questions to ask candidates

Ask candidates where they stand on the use of animals for entertainment, and what they would do to ensure animal welfare and public safety are protected.

Would you support prohibiting rodeos or specific rodeo events involving practices that cause animals pain, fear, stress, or risk of injury?
Would you support prohibiting mobile live animal programs involving exotic or wild animals?
Would you support a positive list of animal species that can be kept in the community?
Would you support prohibiting horse racing in our community?
Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on high-traffic roads or areas with heavy pedestrian and vehicle activity?
Contact your candidates now ↓
Share about this issue
A shareable graphic for social media that says "Animals shouldn't suffer for entertainment" with a picture of a sad-looking horse being ridden in a rodeo.
To download: right click + save image as
"This election, I’m asking candidates what they will do to protect animals from fear, stress, suffering and injury in entertainment, and support safer, animal-free alternatives."
Send these resources to your email→

Support policies that help keep people and pets together, assist pet guardians in need and strengthen protections for animals sold in pet stores

A person kneels down and speaks with a sitting person holding a dog leash.
What local governments can do

For many people, pets are family.

Local policies can help make communities more welcoming and safer for people and their companion animals. 

You can support this by advocating for pet-friendly housing and policies that reduce barriers for renters with pets, support for low-income pet guardians, and responsible regulation of the sale of live animals in pet stores.

Examples of local action​

Pet-friendly housing

Vancouver has incorporated pet-friendly housing considerations into its Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy, including within development frameworks such as the Broadway Plan. 

This shows how local housing policies can recognize the importance of keeping people and their pets together.

Live animal sales

Richmond, Vancouver, New Westminster and Delta have all taken municipal action to restrict the sale of live animals in pet stores, showing how local governments can strengthen protections for animals sold commercially.

Want to strengthen your message? Copy one of the examples above to show your candidate what other local governments are already doing.

Read more on this issue

Support low-income pet guardians→

Previous pet-friendly housing initiatives →

Questions to ask candidates

Ask candidates what they would do to make your community more pet-friendly, help keep people and their animals together, and strengthen support for pets and their guardians.

Would you support policies that make it easier for renters to find and keep pet-friendly housing, including pet-friendly units in new affordable and supportive housing developments?
Would you support funding or partnerships for low-cost or subsidized veterinary services and programs that provide pet food to residents experiencing financial hardship?
Would you support policies that encourage pet stores to partner with local shelters and rescues rather than selling commercially bred animals?
Would you support restricting the sale of live animals in pet stores?
Contact your candidates now ↓

Share about this issue

A shareable graphic for social media that says "Pets are family" with a picture of a child and their dog cuddling on a pillow.
To download: right click + save image as
"This election, I’m asking candidates what they will do to support pet-friendly housing, help keep people and pets together, and strengthen protections for companion animals."
Send these resources to your email→
2. Ask your candidates

There are lots of ways to raise animal welfare issues during a local election campaign.
Choose the approach that feels most comfortable for you.

Find your local candidates →

NOTE – The button above will take you to an external web page – Civic Info BC

Navigate to your municipality to find your candidates contact details.

By email or message

Use the template below to contact your local candidates by email, direct message or social media. 

Choose one or more questions that matter most to you, then personalize the message with the candidate’s name, your community and the animal welfare issue you want to raise.

Tip: Keep your question concise, clear and respectful. Candidates receive many messages, and a focused question is more likely to get a useful response.

Dear (candidate name),

My name is (your name) and I live in (your community or neighbourhood).

As a resident and voter, animal welfare is one of my top priorities in this year’s local election. Decisions made at the local level have a real impact on animals. That is why I am reaching out to candidates to find out where they stand before I decide how to vote.

I would appreciate hearing your position on the topics below and how you would address them if elected.

(Add the animal welfare issues that matter most to you here. Consider providing some background information about the issue and then share your questions. You can copy the questions from the guide, or write your own in your own words.)

Thank you for your time, and for putting your name forward to serve our community. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

(Your name)
(Your community/postal code)

Engage in person
Events & debates

Bring the top questions that matter to you to candidate forums, debates and community events.

Tip: Some audience questions are invited in real-time, whereas others ask you to submit your questions ahead of time.

At the Door

If candidates or campaign volunteers come to your door, try asking one or two questions.

Tip: Not every candidate will be prepared to answer your question. Ask for their contact information so that you can follow up.

Make the conversation count
Prioritize animals

Share with candidates that animal welfare is a key election priority for you.

Keep it constructive

Constructive conversations can help people take animal welfare seriously.

Seek commitments

Find out what they would actually do if elected.

Ask, don’t attack

Give them an opportunity to explain their position.

Listen to the answer

Their reasoning can be just as informative as their final position.

Share responsibly

Don’t misrepresent or exaggerate a response.

Find your local candidates →
3. Share what you learn

Your conversations with local candidates can help other voters, too. If a candidate gives you a positive or specific response, consider sharing it with your friends, family and community. You can say:

I asked my local candidates what they would do for animal welfare.

Here’s what I learned…
A shareable graphic for social media that says "I'm speaking up for animals" with a picture of dog holding it's paw above a voting box.
Share it with the VHS!

Candidate responses can help build a picture of the commitments being made across B.C. and help inform animal welfare advocacy following the election. 

Forward us your responses ↓

info(at)VancouverHumaneSociety.bc.ca

No matter where you live in B.C.
Your voice can help shape the future for animals

Learn about the issues. Ask local candidates where they stand. Encourage them to make concrete commitments.  
And together, we can build communities where animals, people, and the environment are safe and protected.

Read the key issues ↑
Contact your candidates ↑

Authorized by Vancouver Humane Society, registered sponsor under LECFA, (604) 266-9744

Categories
News/Blog

Before you plan that wildlife experience… you should read this

In summary:
  • For many of us that love animals, we seek out experiences with them to feel closer.
  • Whether it’s watching whales, observing bears from a distance, or visiting an elephant sanctuary abroad, wildlife encounters can seem exciting and create lasting memories.  
  • However, not all wildlife experiences are created equal, and it can be difficult to tell whether your participation benefits or harms animals.
  • While observing animals in their natural habitats and from a safe distance can support conservation and appreciation for wildlife, many attractions involve captive wild animals and prioritize entertainment over the wellbeing of animals.

While the Vancouver Humane Society opposes keeping wild and exotic animals in permanent captivity for entertainment or education, new research offers a framework to help visitors make informed decisions before choosing to participate in wildlife tourism attractions. 

Learn more

Travelling tips

Tips for staying local

Share this post!

Why it’s so difficult to identify ethical wildlife attractions

Unlike restaurants or hotels, there are no universally accepted standards regulating wildlife tourism attractions around the world. In the absence of regulation, consumers make decisions based on advertisements, online reviews, or what appears enjoyable at first glance.

Researchers argue that responsible wildlife tourism depends on giving visitors better tools to evaluate attractions, not just based on marketing claims, but on meaningful indicators of animal welfare, conservation, and governance. 

  • There is no sufficient regulation of wildlife tourism attractions

  • The standards of treatment for animals are often determined by what tourists find acceptable

  • Wildlife tourist attractions marketed as educational or conservation-focused can have negative outcomes for animal welfare and the conservation of wild populations 

  • It can be difficult for tourists to know which attractions genuinely prioritize animals, and which are driven primarily by profit 

Problems arise when animals are suffering, and visitors don’t recognize the signs of poor welfare

Research has found that attractions with poor welfare and conservation outcomes often receive positive tourist reviews because visitors are not equipped to assess what animals need.

An animal may appear calm when they are stressed, resigned, or displaying abnormal behaviours that most people wouldn’t recognize. 

The authors describe several barriers that prevent tourists from making informed choices, including: 

  • Misleading marketing that emphasizes conservation without evidence

  • Limited transparency about how animals are acquired, housed, or managed

  • Psychological biases that lead people to assume enjoyable experiences must also be ethical, and

  • Inconsistent or absent regulation across different countries and tourism sectors

Looking beyond animal welfare alone

The researchers advocate that responsible wildlife tourism should be evaluated through three connected lenses:  

  1. Animal welfare: Are animals able to express natural behaviours? Are they free from unnecessary stress, pain, fear, and deprivation? 
  2. Conservation: Does the attraction genuinely contribute to protecting wildlife and habitats, or does it simply use conservation as a marketing tool?
  3. Governance: Is the organization transparent, accountable, scientifically informed, and committed to ethical management?

Looking at only one of these areas can paint an incomplete picture.

An attraction may support conservation programs but keep ambassador animals in poor conditions. Another may provide good day-to-day care while sourcing animals through harmful wildlife trade or breeding animals who will be kept in captivity permanently.

Responsible wildlife tourism requires considering all three together. 

Little girl watching wild rhinoceros in zoo, back view

Questions every traveler can ask

Rather than expecting tourists to become wildlife experts overnight, the researchers propose practical questions that anyone can use before visiting an attraction.

  • Does the attraction clearly explain its conservation work with measurable outcomes?

  • Are performances, rides, feeding sessions, or photo opportunities part of the business model?

  • Is there independent oversight or accreditation?

  • Does the organization provide transparent information about where animals came from and how they are cared for?

These kinds of questions shift attention away from whether an experience feels exciting and toward whether it benefits the animals involved.

Responsible tourism benefits animals and travelers

Ethical wildlife tourism doesn’t mean giving up unforgettable wildlife experiences.

In many cases, the most rewarding encounters happen when wild animals are observed behaving naturally in the wild from a safe distance or, where appropriate, by visiting accredited sanctuaries that prioritize the care and recovery of rescued animals over visitor experiences.

Choosing responsible wildlife experiences also sends an important message. By supporting opportunities to observe wildlife respectfully in their natural habitats or legitimate rescue and rehabilitation efforts that do not exploit animals, travelers help shift demand away from attractions that keep wild animals in captivity for entertainment.

How you can support wildlife while travelling

The Vancouver Humane Society encourages visitors to avoid attractions that keep wild animals in permanent captivity for the sake of entertainment or education.

This framework can help you assess an attraction’s animal welfare practices and make a more informed decision:

  • Research attractions beyond their marketing materials. 
  • Turn down attractions that involve touching, holding, riding, feeding, or posing for photos with wild animals. 
  • Look for organizations that are transparent and detailed about their conservation efforts and animal acquisition and care practices.  
    • Are the animals rescued?
    • Are they being rehabilitated for release back into the wild, or are they non-releasable and living in a sanctuary?  
    • Are animals being bred and kept permanently in captivity? 
  • Remember that ethical wildlife encounters involve observing animals from a respectful distance, when animals may not even be aware of your presence.  

How you can support wildlife in your local community

Staying close to home? There are still ways you can be a responsible wildlife tourist in your own community.

Mobile live animal programs are a common attraction, but they involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale, which raises welfare concerns.

Examples of mobile live animal programs can include:  

  • Travelling petting zoos at public or private events, such as community fairs or birthday parties 
  • Classroom presentations involving wild and exotic animals 
  • Reptile expos 
  • Events where exotic animals are sold  
Reptiles in small containers at an exotic pet expo

You can apply the same principles above to events in your community before choosing to attend. Learn more about the VHS’s campaign to regulate wild, exotic animals in B.C. 

More ways you can take action

Now that you are better equipped to assess wildlife attractions, there are even more ways to deepen your knowledge and help protect wild animals: 

  1. Check out the latest VHS podcast episode where we speak with Erin Ryan, the Wildlife Campaigns Manager at World Animal Protection, to dive deeper into the harms of captive wild animal attractions and what alternatives you can look for.
  2. Share this post to help raise awareness and inspire others to make wildlife-friendly choices  

Together, we can build a future where ethical wildlife tourism never needs to come at the expense of animal welfare.  

The VHS is grateful to the Animal Welfare Foundation of Canada for their generous grant funding of our work to raise awareness about the suffering of wild, exotic animals kept in captivity as pets and used in mobile live animal programs. 

Social media can be part of the solution, not the problem.

Share our content to reach more people and spread the word!

Read the original study here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4619427/

Categories
News/Blog

Treat wildlife trafficking as the serious crime that it is

Head-on photo of an African elephant in the wild

Quick summary

  • Wildlife trafficking generates US$199 billion annually but is largely absent from binding global enforcement frameworks.
  • Elephanatics and World Elephant Day are calling for Canada to lead the global effort to establish a dedicated Wildlife Crime Protocol under the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC).
  • You can help by taking the quick action to contact your MP through Elephanatics’s campaign page.
Take quick action

Wildlife trafficking has become a major organized crime

Every year, transnational wildlife crime generates an estimated US$199 billion. Despite this, trafficking animals is often treated as a minor regulatory offence. That means organized crime networks can exploit Canada’s borders with relatively low risk and enormous reward.

Advocates at Elephanatics and World Elephant Day are working to change that, and they need your help.

Addressing wildlife tracking as the serious crime it is

Elephanatics, in partnership with World Elephant Day, is calling on Canadians to urge their Member of Parliament to support a dedicated Wildlife Crime Protocol under the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC), the principal global treaty for fighting international crime networks.

A dedicated protocol would require countries to treat wildlife trafficking with the same legal seriousness as other major organized crimes. It would give law enforcement better tools for cross-border investigations and intelligence sharing, and help dismantle a massive illegal industry that threatens ecosystems and economies worldwide.

Take quick action

Elephanatics has made it easy to contact your MP directly. Click the link below to send an email with just a few clicks.

Take quick action

Every email sent is a step toward meaningful structural change for wildlife around the world

Categories
News/Blog

Rainbow Bridge Remembrance Day

Did you know August 28th is Rainbow Bridge Remembrance Day? This day was originally created to honour our companion animals who have moved on.  

This day reminds us of the undeniable and special connection between humans and their pets: the unwavering love they share and their reminders to be present, to be silly, and to always take advantage of a good sunbeam nap.  

Today, in observation of Rainbow Bridge Remembrance Day, we invite you to give a special gift in honour of a pet who lives in your heart and has changed your life forever. 

When you donate below, you can choose to give in honour of a beloved companion. Your thoughtful gift will pay tribute to their life and bring hope and healing to animals in need today. 🌈 

Looking for other ways to support? Share this blog post! ❤️

🎵 Thank you @desireedawsonmusic for gifting us with “you’re who I see”. 100% of the proceeds from the song purchases on Bandcamp will go to the Vancouver Humane Society’s McVitie Fund.

Honour Their Memory 🌈 Bring Hope to Animals in Need

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.