Categories
News/Blog

Exposing the harms faced by animals in entertainment

To many people, a day at the rodeo, a night at the races, a holiday carriage ride, or an exotic pet show seem like harmless family fun. But to animal allies who understand the realities that horses, calves, reptiles, and other animals face behind the scenes, the scene is much more sombre.

Animals used for entertainment are often transported in cramped, barren conditions, displayed in noisy, unfamiliar environments, and are subjected to the use of painful tools like bits, spurs, and flank straps. They are not given the choice to live their lives as they wish and express their natural behaviours; for some animals, almost every moment of their lives is controlled by the people who profit off of them.

That is why the Vancouver Humane Society continues to speak up for animals used for entertainment. With your support, the VHS is working to expose harm, gather evidence, and urge decision-makers to introduce policies that better protect animals.

Rodeos

A bull in the chutes at The Calgary Stampede rodeo. Jo-Anne McArthur \ We Animals Media.

The VHS is documenting and exposing animal welfare concerns at B.C. rodeos, gathering evidence of the ways animals are forced into frightening, chaotic environments, and submitting cruelty complaints where appropriate. This year we are closely monitoring two rodeos that have a history of concerning treatment and hold those who cause animal suffering accountable. Stay tuned for advocacy opportunities when we develop a report using years of evidence to call for an end to public funding of rodeos and stronger provincial regulations.

Take action on B.C. rodeos

The VHS is also continuing to speak out about the Calgary Stampede rodeo and chuckwagon races. A recent change to Alberta’s Animal Protection Act introduced stricter rules around animal cruelty but, despite advocacy from the VHS’s Albertan supporters, included an explicit loophole for rodeo and chuckwagon events that leaves these animals vulnerable. In 2026, the VHS will continue speaking up for animals used in the Stampede’s events so they are not left behind. The advocacy team will support We Animals Media in getting access to document the realities animals face behind the scenes, collaborate with Calgary advocates, monitor for unreported injuries and fatalities, expose incidents with nationwide media coverage, share information through a public campaign, and urge decision-makers to support an end to rodeo and chuckwagon events.

Take action on the Calgary Stampede

Horse racing

Hastings Racecourse announces closure in Vancouver (The Early Edition)

Chantelle Archambault from the Vancouver Humane Society discusses the closure of Hastings Racecourse in Vancouver, which was announced this past Friday. Originally aired on The Early Edition from CBC News; shared on The Informed Animal Ally podcast.

On the heels of a recent decision to shut down operations at Vancouver’s controversial and risky Hastings Racecourse, the VHS advocated for a safe retirement for horses and continues to raise awareness about the inherent risk and stress associated with horse racing.

CBC Radio interview on Hastings Racecourse

Exotic animal shows

Another major focus is wild and exotic animals whose natural needs and behaviours are denied as they are transported for display in events, expos, and television. The VHS will be a compassionate set of eyes at exotic animal events in 2026, filing cruelty complaints when animals are harmed and raising awareness about how animals used in these situations face fear and stress. That evidence will be used to advocate for stronger regulations to protect these vulnerable animals.

This work builds on recent momentum, including Port Moody’s mobile live animal program ban, a B.C.-wide exotic cat ban, and ongoing discussions around stronger regulation of exotic animal keeping, breeding, transport, and public display.

Horse carriages

The VHS is also raising concerns about the well-being and safety of horses used for carriage rides. An ongoing campaign calls for an end to horses being forced to pull carriages in stressful urban environments.
Animals forced into entertainment industries can show us they are uncomfortable and afraid, but they cannot ask for a different future. With your help, the VHS continues to speak up for them.

Your support helps to expose and end the suffering of animals exploited for spectacle. Together, we can move toward a future where animals are respected for who they are, not what they can be made to do.

Take action on horse carriages
Categories
News/Blog

Welfare concerns renewed after fall involving horse and rider during bucking event at Cloverdale Rodeo 

Image credit: Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals. Bucking event at Calgary Stampede.

  • A horse and rider are recovering after a saddle bronc bucking incident at the 2026 Cloverdale Rodeo.
  • The incident raises renewed concerns about high-risk and high-stress rodeo events that put both people and animals in danger.
  • Rodeo events like saddle bronc riding rely on animals reacting under pressure, which can cause fear, stress, and risk of injury.
  • The VHS is calling for an end to inhumane rodeo events and to the use of taxpayer dollars to support them.
Learn more about welfare concerns
Take action
Read the full article

Take action: Ask decision-makers to stop using public funds to support rodeo events and to strengthen protections for animals used in entertainment. 

Image credit: Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals

A horse and rider are recovering after a saddle bronc incident at this past weekend’s Cloverdale Rodeo, renewing concerns about high-risk and high-stress rodeo events that put both people and animals in danger. 

According to the Surrey Now-Leader, the incident took place on Saturday night during the 2026 Cloverdale Rodeo. Rider Nick Patterson and the horse Spring Season became tangled during a saddle bronc bucking event and went down together. Patterson was transported by ambulance for further evaluation and later released, while Spring Season is reportedly recovering. 

The reported recovery of both Spring Season and Patterson is welcome news. Still, the incident raises broader safety and animal welfare concerns.

Rodeo poses a risk to both human participants and animals, but unlike humans, the animals did not choose to be there. 

Rodeo events like saddle bronc riding rely on animals reacting under pressure, putting both human participants and animals at risk of stress and injury.  

For example, in saddle bronc riding and other bucking events, animals are confined in chutes and released into an arena for an event built around provoking or maintaining a bucking response. Equipment and practices such as flank straps and spurring add pressure to the animal’s experience.  

bull riding at a rodeo

Image: bull riding/bucking event at Chilliwack rodeo

Animal welfare is about more than whether an animal survives or avoids visible injury.

It includes their physical health, emotional state, ability to express natural behaviours, freedom from fear, pain, and distress, and ability to have some control over what happens to them. 

Incidents like this also point to the need for stronger public policy, including ending public funding for rodeo events and strengthening regulations to better protect animals. 

That is why the VHS continues to call for an end to rodeo events that cause animal suffering, stress, injury, and death.  

Communities can come together, celebrate tradition, and enjoy local events without putting animals through fear and stress for public entertainment. 

Take action now for animal welfare
Read the full article

Categories
News/Blog

Ontario racecourse ends horse racing

Rideau Carleton Raceway ending horse racing program

The Rideau Carleton Raceway is shutting down its horse racing program, the raceway’s operators say.

Following the closure of both B.C.’s active horse racing tracks in 2025, another racecourse in Ontario has announced an end to its horse racing program.

“The Rideau Carleton Raceway is shutting down its horse racing program, the raceway’s operators say.”

The closures come as a result of waning public support and declining revenues, which have been making the industry unsustainable at various locations. Though these horses will move to other racing venues in Ontario, the closure signals a hopeful shift in public attitudes around the use of animals in risky sporting events.

Horse racing poses serious welfare concerns due to:

  • Common incidents of injury and death for horses;
  • Issues with selective breeding—thoroughbred horses are often overbred for speed rather than skeletal strength, making their legs susceptible to fatal injury;
  • Young starts to horses’ short racing careers, which puts them at high risk and can cause early decline;
  • Aversive training methods and uncomfortable equipment, like whips and tight bits, which can cause stress and pain.

These welfare concerns put horses at risk of an uncertain future, as do the track closures that result from declining revenues and public support. As such, industry professionals should transition away from breeding new animals into an unstable future and plan for a compassionate retirement for horses who may be impacted by closures.

Watch, read, or listen to a recent VHS interview on CBC Radio to learn more about what a compassionate retirement for horses would look like.

Read the article
Podcast episode
Categories
News/Blog

Proposed changes to Alberta’s animal protection laws leave “sport” animals vulnerable 

Cover image: Calgary Stampede chuckwagon races. Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals Media.

Update

The Alberta government passed the Animal Protection Amendment Act (Bill 22). The update includes some meaningful changes to protect animals, but sadly, the Bill passed with an exemption that leaves animals vulnerable to distress during sporting activities. Please see the Current Campaigns page for more ways you can help animals used in rodeo and other sporting events.

  • Alberta is proposing its first major update to animal protection laws in more than 20 years.  
  • The changes signal a growing recognition that stronger protections are needed to prevent animal suffering and hold offenders accountable. 
  • While some proposed changes in the Animal Protection Amendment Act (Bill 22) include meaningful improvements to be celebrated, animals used in sporting events, such as rodeos, are left vulnerable. 

Alberta residents: Learn more below, then email your MLA and Alberta Minister of Agriculture, Minister RJ Sigurdson (AGRIC.Minister@gov.ab.ca), to express your concern and seek stronger protections for animals used in sporting activities.

Find my MLA
Email Minister Sigurdson
Learn more
Tips for your email

Current laws & proposed changes

Under the existing Animal Protection Act in Alberta, which has had no major updates in more than 20 years, it is illegal to cause an animal to be in distress, with exemptions for some animal use industries. 

Now, Alberta is proposing a major update. This signals important progress—but one of the proposed changes would allow distress resulting from the use of animals in a sporting activity that is carried out in accordance with “reasonable and generally accepted practices”, expanding the types of industries exempted. 

This concerning change could allow sporting industries that use animals to effectively make their own rules and allow harmful practices that cause significant suffering, such as in rodeo events. 

This change may also make it harder to hold people accountable or enforce rules while setting a risky example that other jurisdictions might follow. Removing the proposed exemption for allowing distress in sporting activities is a critical step toward ensuring animals are protected. 

If you are a resident of Alberta, or have friends and family who are residents, share this information and contact your MLA and the Minister of Agriculture, who is sponsoring the Bill, to request changes to better protect animals. The legislation is moving quickly! Don’t hesitate to speak up for animals. 

A persistent loophole

Vague language, like “reasonable and generally accepted practices” often allows industries to set their own standards when no external standards exist, even when those practices may cause harm. It may also limit enforcement action when there are no clear guidelines on what a generally accepted practice is.  

Animals used in sporting activities should not be subjected to distress or cruel practices for entertainment. Closing this loophole by removing the exemption for causing distress in sporting activities is a critical step toward ensuring animals are protected.  

Limited public input

While the province consulted with a range of stakeholders, including industry representatives and enforcement agencies, there was no formal public comment period for the Animal Protection Amendment Act (Bill 22). This has left many concerned individuals in a rush to contact their MLAs to request amendments before the bill progresses further. 

The legislation is still in early stages, and there remains an opportunity to strengthen protections for animals. However, the timeline for public input is unclear, and the process appears to be moving quickly. 

Don’t hesitate! Contact your MLA and Minister Sigurdson and express your concerns before the legislation progresses and amendments can no longer be made.  

Find my MLA
Email Minister Sigurdson

Tips for requesting amendments by email

To request amendments to the Animal Protection Amendment Act (Bill 22), consider: 

  • Raising concern about vague exemptions like “reasonable and generally accepted practices” that can result in significant animal suffering.
  • Requesting the removal of the proposed distress exemptions for animals used in sporting activities. 
  • Calling for clear, enforceable protections that address the risks associated with rodeo and other animal-based sporting activities. 
    • For example, prohibiting the most dangerous and inhumane rodeo events, handling practices, and tools that cause animal suffering.

As the bill moves forward, decision-makers have an opportunity to build on these improvements and deliver legislation that fully reflects the public’s expectation for strong, enforceable animal protection laws. 

By contacting your MLA or encouraging friends or family who are Alberta residents to do so, you are taking direct action to strengthen protections for animals.  

Categories
News/Blog

Podcast: Animal advocacy and Vancouver Humane Society’s mission (Vegan Boss Radio)

All episodes

The Vancouver Humane Society’s Chantelle Archambault sat down with Shawna Barker from the Vegan Boss Radio podcast about Vancouver Humane Society’s mission, work, and some practical ways that animal allies can make a difference.

Note: This written discussion has been edited for length.

Advocacy and justice for animals

A long-haired Highland cow stands in a grassy field, gently nuzzling a small calf beside her.

Shawna: Hi everyone. Welcome to Vegan Boss Radio. I am your host, Shawna Barker, and I’m so glad you’re here today. Today’s episode is a very important one because we’re talking about animal advocacy, public awareness, and how real change actually happens, not just online, but at the policy and community level.

Today I’m joined by Chantelle Archambault, who has worked as the communications director at the Vancouver Humane Society since 2021. She is deeply passionate about justice for all, both humans and animals, and has spent her career working with nonprofit organizations focused on family services, social justice, advocacy, and creating safer spaces for marginalized communities.

Chantelle’s lifelong commitment to the ethical treatment of animals inspired her to volunteer with the Toronto Humane Society and eventually move across Canada to take on her current role at Vancouver Humane Society. She has appeared in media outlets, including the CBC, CTV, CityNews, and the Daily Hive.

In this conversation, we talk about the work that the Vancouver Humane Society does behind the scenes, including its past and current campaigns, how they raise public awareness around practices like rodeos and horse racing, and why these issues are often misunderstood or even normalized, in many cases.

Chantelle, thank you so much for being here today. I’m wondering what drew you to animal advocacy, and then how did that lead you to working with the Vancouver Humane Society?

Chantelle: Thanks so much for having me today. It’s interesting to be on this side of the question because I love asking this to our guests on the Vancouver Humane Society podcast, Informed Animal Ally, as well. I got into animal advocacy the way that I found a lot of people I speak with do as well. I’ve always been drawn to animals since I was a kid, making my dad wait before he drove to work on rainy days so I could pick up every single worm off the driveway so they wouldn’t get squished. I was putting the spiders out through the window in the classrooms so the other kids wouldn’t step on them.

When I was in university, I volunteered doing feline enrichment at the Toronto Humane Society. I worked at an organization that worked with marginalized communities affected by HIV and then at a Children’s and family organization. Those were both organizations that aligned with my values.

I care about justice for humans for all of the same reasons I care about justice for animals. But I always knew that my dream job would be to work in the animal sector doing communications, telling those stories from the animals because their voices are ignored so often.

Shawna: That’s so incredible. It sounds like it was very much meant to be. Maybe for listeners that are not familiar with the Vancouver Humane Society, could you share a little bit about the mission and the types of work that you do?

Chantelle: Yeah, absolutely. So, the Vancouver Humane Society’s mission is to expose and end animal suffering and exploitation, including supporting individuals, organizations, and governments in caring for the wellbeing of animals. So, we work in five main areas to do that.

There are already a lot of great rescues who do work in taking in pets who really need it. So, our goal is to support the guardians of animals who are loved, but just need some help to keep them cared for at home and out of the shelter rescue system. We offer emergency veterinary support for low-income guardians so that they can get their pets cared for and back home safe rather than having to watch their pets suffer or make the really difficult decision to either euthanize them or give them up to get the care they need. We do a lot of advocacy work around animals in captivity, zoos, aquariums, mobile petting zoos, exotic pets, and animals in entertainment. That includes things like rodeos, horse carriages, horse racing, and wildlife.

Recently, we’ve taken more of a support role on this one for other organizations that focus on wild animals like the fur bearers. But we’ve covered things like, wildlife culls, hunting and fishing, regulations for farming, rodent poisons, and then farmed animals. That is a major area because, I’m sure you know, farmed animal welfare is often considered the greatest animal welfare issue on the planet.

We work in plant-based advocacy to make plant-based eating more accessible and reduce the demand for animals to be farmed for food. And we also advocate for better policies and practices that address the worst harms animals face while they’re currently in the farming system.

Rodeos and horse racing

Three jockeys lean forward as their horses gallop closely together during a horse race.

Shawna: I was scrolling one of the Facebook groups for the Hastings Sunrise neighbourhood and I saw a petition to bring back Hastings horse racing track. How do people not see how much cruelty is involved there? What do you wish more people knew about those industries?

Chantelle: Yeah. There are so many misconceptions about those two industries, and what a lot of it comes down to is lack of choice. The main argument from those industries and their supporters is that those animals love their jobs, but animals aren’t like human athletes because they don’t have a choice.

Animals used in rodeo do the behaviours that rodeo announcers pass off as performing are actually natural fear responses. A racehorse isn’t like a human athlete who gets to go home and do what they want. At the end of the day, their whole life and full routine is controlled by their handlers who decide when they train, when they rest, when and if they get time to run free. Animals also don’t choose to get into those situations. They’re bred for those industries, and if they don’t do what they’re expected, they’re punished for it.

For rodeo and horse racing, we actually did an entire podcast episode just on this topic called Eight Arguments in Support of Rodeo and How to Respond, because there are so many, and we’ve run into them all the time.

For horse racing, the most common argument is that if we take away horse racing, those horses will have nowhere to go and they’ll be sent to slaughter. First of all, this shouldn’t be true anyway. Horses are only able to race for a fraction of their lives because it’s quite hard on their bodies. So, any responsible industry should have a retirement plan in place.

The best outcome is one where horses can spend their days as freely as possible, like in a sanctuary or being therapy horses. We advocated for the BC government to support that transition when Hastings racecourse in Vancouver closed down, as you mentioned. And the other side of that coin is that while the industry is arguing that we have to keep horse racing around, because there are so many racehorses who would have nowhere to go, they have still been breeding more animals into this industry.

Shawna: Have there been campaigns to stop the horse carriage rides in Victoria?

Chantelle: We have worked around the horse carriage rides in Victoria a little bit. Right now, we’re working on a horse carriage campaign in Vancouver. We’re trying to get horse carriages off of busy city streets.

Education for long-term change

An overhead view of a wooden table set with colorful plant-based dishes.

Shawna: Beyond the individual campaigns that VHS works on, are there examples of maybe systems-level work, maybe through getting policies changed, education or outreach to address long-term changes that will benefit animals?

Chantelle: Yeah, absolutely. Education is a really important part of the work we do because the only way we can make change for animals is if people know what the issues are and care enough to help make those changes.

One project I am really excited to share is our plant university program. We originally launched Plant University in 2022 as a home for our ongoing work making plant-based eating more accessible to individuals through personal education, like sharing recipes and also working with institutions.

To improve access to plant-based foods for instance, in the past we’ve worked with school cafeterias to help organize meatless Mondays, and that work has carried on over the past few years. We’ve developed a recipe library and shared reasons and tips to eat more plant-based foods with people all over Canada.

And we’ve also been working with businesses and institutions like long-term care homes more locally to help them transition part of their menus. We’ve also supported change at the government level. A couple years ago, we created a report for the City of Vancouver on how transitioning a percentage of the food they purchased to plant-based could save them money and help meet their environmental goals.

This last year, we transitioned the program to specifically target post-secondary students in the Lower Mainland. A lot of students are making food purchasing decisions on their own for the first time in their lives, and when we share all the benefits of choosing plant-based options along with tips for eating more plant-based foods like recipes and an on-campus food guide, there’s a much better chance we’ll see that translate into new habits these young folks will carry with them through the rest of their lives. So, we’ve been doing things like in-class presentations, outreach events, signage, and posters on campus.

Emotional toll of animal advocacy

A person wearing a cap and denim jacket gently embraces a dog.

Shawna: I know advocacy work can be really kind of emotionally heavy. I mean, you’re seeing and talking about like animals being mistreated all the time. Maybe for yourself or for your team, is there a way that you navigate feeling emotionally burnt out by doing this kind of work and how to stay motivated?

Chantelle: Yeah, it is really tough sometimes. We find different ways to share what’s happening through writing, but that means we need to watch the footage of what animals are going through behind the scenes at rodeos or in slaughterhouses. That does really get to you because you know that you can walk away from seeing this at the end of the day, but for so many animals, this is their whole lives.

I really try to ground myself by recognizing that I’m doing everything I can do to help. I’m doing advocacy, so fewer animals have to go through this. I am vegan, so I’m not directly contributing to animals going through what they go through in the farming system. And then I spend lots of time connecting with the world around me in different ways when I’m not working, talking to my loved ones, talking to my cat, taking my cat out into the backyard so she can live the best life that she can.

I know if I’m not able to take care of myself and reset, I’m not going to be as effective in actually doing this advocacy. So, taking time for ourselves is part of being a good animal advocate.

The role of public awareness

Close-up of a horse’s face, showing its eyes.

Shawna: You mentioned kind of the role that public awareness plays. Do you feel that the public awareness does play a huge role in actually like changing the laws in these practices?

Chantelle: Yeah, absolutely. Public awareness is huge. We live in a world where companies, for the most part, are going to do what’s most profitable. Governments, for the most part, are going to do what gets them re-elected.

So, when we raise public awareness, people change their behaviours and they speak up and it tells those leaders of companies and governments that compassion is the popular choice, that’s going to be more profitable or it’s going to get more people on their side before the next election. When we do see government representatives connect with an issue on a personal level, it’s often because they’ve heard from individuals in their community, not necessarily from someone who’s representing an organization.

Shawna: For increasing public awareness, what are the best strategies? Would you say on social media you have a good reach or is it door-to-door campaigns with petitions? I’m just wondering what is an effective way to get the word out?

Chantelle: I think there are so many different ways. If someone is individually doing this, I would say play to your strengths.

If you have an audience online, definitely online is a great way to reach people. If you’re out in your community and you’re connecting people one-on-one in groups, that’s a great way to reach people. If you’re at an event and you can bring like a plant-based dish, use that as an opener to talk about animal suffering in the farmed animal system. Like anything that you can do to get people talking and thinking, I think is a great way to educate people about the things animals go through. There are opportunities all the time, all around us.

Shawna: And then for Vancouver Humane Society specifically, are you reaching people in specific neighbourhoods directly or do you feel like a lot of the reach comes from posting videos and articles on social media?

Chantelle: The biggest two routes that we take are through our email list and organic social media posts.

There are people who are really deeply engaged and we have about 16,000 people on our email list. We send out things that they can share on social media, ways that they can take direct action, ways that they can speak up to their elected officials.

Shawna: Someone who maybe isn’t on your email list and deeply cares about animals but feels overwhelmed and is not sure where to start—what would you suggest as a way to support this work?

Chantelle: Yeah, I would say the most basic first step is to find an organization that really aligns with your values and subscribe to their email list.

We have so many quick actions, like emails to decision makers, petitions to sign, campaigns to share around. There are ways to get involved to varying degrees based on how much time you have to spend on advocacy work, from a ten second click to a more in-depth collaborative piece.

In a more general sense, I would advise people to get to know your government representatives at the local, provincial, and federal levels. Your city council members, your members of Legislative Assembly, your members of parliament.

Once you make a connection with them, you’re in a much better position to let them know that you care about animals or what you care about in general when a policy decision comes up that they’re involved with. You don’t need to be an expert, it can really just be about going to them and saying, hey, I care about animals, we are a community that loves animals. I really hope you’ll vote for better animal welfare when the opportunity comes up.

Shawna: And if someone wants to engage with anything that VHS is working on and but they don’t live in Vancouver or even British Columbia, are there ways to get involved or do you suggest they find other local humane societies?

Chantelle: I definitely suggest you always find local organizations that you can make a difference locally on issues that are near you, and likely near and dear to your heart. But you absolutely don’t need to live in Vancouver to get involved with our campaigns. We cover a whole range of campaigns from local issues to issues of national importance. Most of our quick actions can be taken by anyone in Canada and sometimes beyond.

I’d recommend you go to our website, vancouverhumane.ca and sign up for our email list to get all the updates. You can also follow us at Vancouver Humane Society on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, or Blue Sky. Any of those ways is going to be a great first route to get involved.

Shawna: Okay. Amazing. Well, Chantelle, I want to thank you so much for sharing everything that Vancouver Humane Society is working on, and ways for people to get involved. I know you really are emphasizing people getting involved with their local officials and I think that is such an important way to help shed light and address some of the injustices going on towards animals in your community. Did you have any final thoughts or anything you wanted to share with our listeners?

Chantelle: I just wanted to thank you so much for having me on today and giving me the opportunity to share about this. I think this is a great podcast and it was a really great conversation and I am glad that we had the chance to talk today.

Categories
News/Blog

How to spot red flags when animals appear in media.

Image credit: Ana Norman Bermudez / We Animals

Animals appear in tv and film, advertisements, and our social media feeds. While some content celebrates animals in respectful ways, other videos and images raise serious welfare concerns.  Knowing what to look for can help you make more ethical choices about the content you watch and share. 

Share this post!

Red flags to watch for when animals are used in media:

  • Animals who appear unhealthy, such as being underweight, overweight, injured, or poorly groomed 
  • The use of wild and exotic animals in captivity for the purpose of entertainment 
  • Forced interactions, such as animals being held for the camera, hugged, or used for selfies.  
  • Animals made to perform tricks, dangerous stunts or forced actions 
  • Wild or exotic animals wearing clothes or being treated like props 
  • Signs of stress, fear, or attempts to escape 
  • Handlers using intimidation or violence to control animals 
  • Animals forced to work in extreme heat, cold, noise, bright lights, or crowded environments 

These signs often point to unethical training methods or poor living conditions behind the scenes. Wild and exotic animals are not domesticated, even if bred in captivity, and can face serious risks to their welfare off-screen. 

While it can be difficult to spot red flags from edited media, it is worth pausing to consider where the animals on our screens may have come from and what their lives may look like off-screen.  

A barn owl sits tethered to the hand of their handler in Prague, Czechia. This owl is displayed in order to sell photoshoots with the captive bird. Prague, Czechia, 2021. Lukas Vincour / Zvirata Nejime / We Animals
Credit: Lukas Vincour / Zvířata Nejíme / We Animals

There are also positive indicators to look out for

Green flags include content that:

  • Encourages responsible animal guardianship of domesticated species
  • Shows animals engaging in natural, species-appropriate behaviours
  • Depicts animals in a respectful and dignified way

Ethical animal content features animals in healthy physical condition, living in appropriate environments, and behaving naturally. It also reflects a genuine commitment to animal welfare, not just entertainment value. Importantly, animals should always have the choice to engage.

Girl hipster teenager with camera on farm in meadow takes photo of little young goat
Credit: Victoria de Martigny / Farm Sanctuary / We Animals

Some guiding principles

If you come across a video that raises concerns about animal welfare, it can be tempting to comment or share to call it out.

Unfortunately, this increases engagement and can encourage creators to produce more harmful content. The most effective response is not to interact with the content at all and to file a complaint with the company producing and showing the content, or to report the content to appropriate enforcement agencies if animal cruelty is observed.

Many animal videos are harmless and even positive. This includes well-cared-for companion animals playing or relaxing, or footage of wild animals filmed from a respectful distance without human interference.

Being thoughtful about what we watch, and share is one small but powerful way to protect animals. Every view counts. Choosing ethical content helps create a culture where animal welfare comes first

Social media can be part of the solution, not the problem.

Share our content to reach more people and spread the word!

Categories
News/Blog

Terrified animals are used as TV props in Fear Factor: House of Fear

Cover image: ‘Fear Factor: House of Fear.’ Photo by Serguei Bachlakov VIA RealityBlurred.com.

Rats are crowded in a clear container open at the top, surrounded a larger container of snakes.
FearFactorUS, YouTube.

Game show contestants are covered in bugs while pigeons fall on them from above.

They crawl past a snake holding a dead rat in their mouth by the tail.

They dig through the entrails of dead animals.

They roughly grab invertebrates by the handful.

They are suspended in the air, picking up rats dangerously by their tails, accidentally dropping them into snake pits, and flinging them into a “safety” enclosure.

It seems like the television of a bygone era; the kind of show we could expect to see sitting around our slightly boxier television sets of the early 2000s. But these challenges are all part of the currently airing Fear Factor: House of Fear. The new series, which was filmed in Metro Vancouver and credits local animal handlers, uses animals in a way that is deeply troubling.

Original post + actions
Media red flags list

Fear Factor: House of Fear makes a spectacle out of animal suffering

In one challenge, contestants are locked into a clear box and covered in insects. Either rats, pigeons, crested geckos, or ball pythons are dropped onto them from above, followed by plastic balls that the contestants must open to reveal a code and escape the enclosure.  

As the show title suggests, we see the contestants visibly afraid, fleeing out of the box as soon as they can, some still covered in animals. We see the animals falling and expressing signs of fear and stress: reptiles writhing after falling a considerable distance, rats defecating over each other and people; pigeons flapping their wings and smacking into the wall of the box. As a former pigeon researcher, I found the clearly agitated birds particularly difficult to watch, although all these species are sentient and capable of feeling pain and stress.  

‘Fear Factor: House of Fear.’

And then there are the things we don’t see. It is unclear how animals are housed above the enclosure or how long they may be left in containers before, during, and after filming. It’s also unclear how animals are removed from the contestants after they escape—whether a handler collects them, or the panicked contestants fling them off. 

And of course, unlike the human contestants, the animals did not choose to be put in frightening situations.

Because these species are often thought of as “pests” and “vermin”, the average viewer may not consider their perspective. Others may assume that because the animals were on television, their treatment on- and off-camera was humane. We may be so accustomed to seeing the “No animals were harmed” disclaimer at the end of tv and film productions that many might assume it’s a requirement. But is it? 

Does seeing animals on TV mean “no animals were harmed”?

“No animals were harmed during the making of this film” is a product of collaboration between filmmakers and the American Humane Society. The disclaimer is provided to productions involving animals that meet certain criteria.

These guidelines are not legally mandatory for all productions. They include things like discouraging the use of glass panes around birds, ensuring that multiple reptiles are accustomed to each other if they are in a scene together to protect their safety, and that all physical and emotional discomfort of any kind is to be strictly avoided. 

The disclaimer is notably absent from Fear Factor: House of Fear. The show does not appear on the American Humane Society’s current list of certified “No animals were harmed” productions

Moving past inhumane “entertainment”

The 2000s version of Fear Factor was born out of a different cultural atmosphere. Once-popular shows based on mockery like The Biggest LoserThe Swan, andTeen Mom are now often dissected for their concerning themes. As we progress culturally, we must continue to be critical of the media shown to us and advocate for better treatment of both animals and people.  

Unfortunately, because the actual events depicted in the currently airing Fear Factor: House of Fear revival show were filmed months ago, they cannot be prevented. However, we can do better in the future. By refusing to engage with media that harms animals, we can send a strong message to production companies that profiting off of fear and harm is no longer acceptable.  

The VHS and advocates are calling for change

The Vancouver Humane Society has reached out to all relevant decision-makers to call for accountability and protection for animals. These are:

  • The BC SPCA: The VHS has submitted a cruelty complaint to the BC SPCA, the only animal welfare organization in B.C. with the authority to investigate complaints of animal abuse or neglect under the provincial Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The BC SPCA is unable to comment on ongoing investigations. We will be sure to share any updates as soon as we are able.
  • Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC): The CBSC deals with complaints and questions from the public about the programming of private broadcasters in Canada. In response to our initial complaint, the VHS received an inadequate response from the shows Canadian broadcaster, Bell Media (CTV), and submitted a ruling request. We await a response to this request, which could take up to four months.
  • Bell Media (CTV): The VHS urged the show’s Canadian broadcaster to stop airing the program, which features improper and inhumane handling of animals.
  • Endemol Shine North America: The VHS also submitted a complaint to the production company of Fear Factor: House of Fear regarding the show’s treatment of animals.
  • B.C. Government: The VHS has contacted provincial decision-makers to call for greater protections for animals used in entertainment such as television productions filmed in the province.

Many supporters have also submitted additional complaints to these decision-makers.

Take action for animals
How to spot red flags in media

Share this post on:
Facebook | Instagram

A new Fear Factor: House of Fear special is set to air in May. For updates, including learning about additional actions as they come up, follow the VHS on social media, subscribe for email notifications, or check back on our website.

Categories
News/Blog

TAKE ACTION: Support the B.C. government decision to end horse racing funding & call for a safe retirement plan for horses

  • In response to the provincial government announcing the end of government funding for horse racing, Hastings Racecourse has announced they will stop horse racing effective immediately.  
  • While there is industry pushback to the B.C. government’s announcement to end funding for horse racing, the decision did not happen in isolation.
  • This change follows decades of decline in revenue and public support and heavy reliance on public funding. 
  • Hastings Racecourse was the last active race track in B.C., meaning there is no more horse racing in the province.
  • Hastings has seen multiple fatalities in recent seasons, including three known horse deaths in 2025, four in 2024, and eight in 2023. Each loss is a reminder of the inherent risks horses face in the racing industry. 
Follow up with decision-makers

While incredibly grateful for this decision, the VHS recognizes the uncertainty it may create for workers and animals within the industry. The VHS urges the provincial government and industry stakeholders to ensure a just and compassionate transition plan, including: 

  • Support for workers in the horse racing industry faced with this transition; 
  • Safe, secure retirement and rehoming plans for horses. 

Join the VHS in extending our sincere gratitude to Minister Nina Krieger for her leadership in making this decision and encourage meaningful support for workers and animals transitioning away from horse racing. Use the VHS’s quick action tool below to send a letter to the Minister and your Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA). 

The VHS recently spoke with CBC on this news. Click here to watch the interview!

Send a message
Watch CBC interview
Categories
News/Blog

New provincial resource launches: The Humane Societies of BC

The Vancouver Humane Society is proud to be part of a new province-wide collaborative: the Humane Societies of British Columbia. This initiative brings together seven independent humane societies to make it easier for people across BC to find trusted, local support for their animal family members, all in one place.

Meet the Humane Societies of BC

HumaneSocietiesBC.ca is a new resource hub that aims to help connect people to local services like veterinary assistance, pet food programs, behaviour support, and emergency care when they’re needed most.

We’ll also be joining together to share timely, life-saving information on pet health and care.

Categories
News/Blog

New ‘Fear Factor’ show filmed in B.C. prompts cruelty complaints: Learn more & take action 

Update

Season one of Fear Factor: House of Fear has ended, and a new special is set to air in May. Please scroll down for current actions and stay tuned for additional news. See the Current Campaigns page for more ways you can help animals.

Submit complaints
Learn more
  • A recently released Fear Factor: House of Fear episode was filmed in Metro Vancouver and involved local animal handlers.
  • The episode has raised serious animal welfare concerns and prompted the VHS to file cruelty complaints.
  • In future episodes yet to air, further incidents of stressful and inhumane treatment of animals are depicted. 
  • The first episode involved putting contestants in enclosed containers and dropping rats, pigeons, geckos, and snakes onto them from above
  • The chaotic conditions presented a clear risk of significant stress, suffering, and injury for the animals
  • Other episodes show further concerning treatment of animals, including a contestant in a closed container with snakes and a dead rat in the contestant’s mouth.
  • The Vancouver Humane Society (VHS) has filed a cruelty complaint with the BC SPCA, and has written to various decision-makers, including the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC); the show’s production company, Endemol Shine North America; and the show’s Canadian broadcaster, CTV.
  • The VHS is calling on CTV to stop airing Fear Factor: House of Fear. 

TAKE ACTION: Join the VHS in filing complaints the show’s production company, Endemol Shine North America, and urge the show’s Canadian broadcaster, CTV, to stop airing Fear Factor: House of Fear.  

Submit complaints
Learn more

Submit complaints

  1. Tell CTV: animal cruelty isn’t entertainment and urge them, as the show’s Canadian broadcaster, to stop airing Fear Factor: House of Fear. 
  2. Submit a complaint to the production company, Endemol Shine North America.
  3. Please see the update below regarding episode complaints submitted to the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC).
    • Update from CBSC website: The CBSC has received a large number of complaints concerning an episode of Fear Factor on CTV. To ensure that all complaints are dealt with efficiently and in a timely manner, the CBSC limits the number of complaints it will accept in respect of the same broadcast. The CBSC process does not vary based on the number of complaints made. The same consideration is given to one single valid complaint as to multiple complaints on the same matter. The CBSC is now dealing with the episode on CTV under its normal process. As a result, no further complaints will be accepted by the CBSC on this issue.”

Depicting animals as props in entertainment sends the wrong message about animal welfare. 

Putting animals in stressful, high-risk situations is cruel and normalizes using animals for human entertainment at the expense of their welfare.

Credit: ‘Fear Factor: House of Fear.’

The practices shown contradict humane handling.

Animals are dropped into containers and onto frightened contestants and other animals, escalating panic and risk of injury. This does not model calm, careful, welfare-first handling, and it undermines the animals’ complex care needs. It’s especially troubling that local handlers would participate in, or endorse, this treatment. 

Credit: ‘Fear Factor: House of Fear.’

The principles of One Health, One Welfare recognizes that human, environmental, and animal health and well-being are interconnected. 

Fear Factor: House of Fear fails to uphold standards for: 

Welfare: Animals and contestants are placed in highly stressful conditions without knowing what will happen next.  One contestant is filmed repeatedly saying they want to leave the enclosure and is ignored, while animals cannot consent to their involvement in filming. 

Health & safety: Both humans and animals are visibly distressed. Stressed animals are more likely to bite and scratch and to shed contagious viruses and pathogens that can pose a health risk to people. Concerningly, the contestant in the container with rats is filmed stating that the the rats were urinating and defecating in the enclosure, highlighting this risk. When people are in distress and afraid, they may throw or harm animals in attempts to get away from them. 

Credit: ‘Fear Factor: House of Fear.’ Photo by Serguei Bachlakov VIA RealityBlurred.com
Submit complaints