The Vancouver Humane Society (VHS) contacted local election candidates in key B.C. communities where current or ongoing animal welfare issues overlap with the VHS’s local advocacy work.
Candidates in these communities were invited to respond to the same questionnaire addressing specific animal welfare issues, such as horse carriages, horse racing, rodeos, mobile live animal programs and exotic animals in captivity.
The responses below are from candidates who have responded to date. Candidates who did not respond are not included in the response summaries.
Responses are organized by community, are presented as received and have not been edited for content. The VHS has not interpreted, rated, or otherwise assessed candidates’ responses.
Select a community from the list below to see the candidates who responded and their answers to each question asked by the VHS. Subscribe for local election resources and updates.
Don’t see your community, question, or candidate here?
Explore the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to contact candidates in your area, ask your own questions, and access helpful resources like candidate tracking tools, message templates, and shareable graphics.
Share this post!
Abbotsford
The VHS asked candidates in Abbotsford the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Abbotsford? “
Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. They often include a wide range of species, ranging from farmed animals like goats, lambs, and chicks, to wild, exotic species like snakes, lizards, tortoises, and sugar gliders. They can include travelling petting zoos, animal presentations at schools and birthday parties, animal displays at community events, and reptile or exotic pet expos.
These programs can expose animals to frequent transportation, repeated public handling, unfamiliar environments, temporary or undersized enclosures, noise and other stressful conditions, often with limited or no opportunity to retreat from public view or engage in natural behaviours. And because healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella, the risks reach people too, especially young children, older adults, and pregnant people. Many examples of disease outbreaks in connection to mobile live animal programs have been documented in recent years.
The VHS believes local governments can play an important role in determining whether and where MLAPs are permitted to operate. For example, the City of Port Moody has adopted a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.
Please briefly explain your position and what action you would take if elected.
“Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?”
Many MLAPs feature exotic animals (wild animals native to countries outside Canada) such as snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders. These animals have complex behavioural, social, dietary, and environmental needs that can be extremely difficult to meet in private homes. The promotion and sale of exotic animals at MLAPs can also contribute to impulse purchases, animal surrender, and risks to native wildlife when exotic animals escape or are released.
The VHS supports a science-based “positive list” approach, in which species would only be permitted to be kept as pets after being assessed, using a scoring tool like EMODE, as suitable based on factors such as animal welfare, health, public safety, and environmental considerations.
Local governments can use local bylaws and licensing tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals. For example, the City of Castlegar’s Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw includes provisions addressing exotic pets, animal performance, exhibition, and display.
No response received yet.
The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.
If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.
You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.
Thank you for reaching out and for all the information you have provided.
Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Abbotsford?
I would support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Abbotsford. Abbotsford is an agricultural community with many chicken, pig, and cattle farms.
I would be concerned that frequent transport of animals, and interaction with humans could also pose a disease threat to our farm animals. I would work with other councillors to promote education in our community to get public support, followed with putting forward a restriction or ban.
Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?
Yes. Our local painted turtle population is threatened by invasive species including non native pet turtles that were released, so I fully support regulations that preserve our indigenous wildlife.
Thanks for reaching out. This isn’t a subject I’m terribly familiar with, so I’ll try my best to answer based on my limited knowledge as well as my personal reasoning.
1. Mobile live animal programs: I wouldn’t support a blanket ban on mobile animal programs. I think these programs can be a great way for kids and families to learn about animals, especially in an agricultural community like Abbotsford. Animal welfare and public safety absolutely need to be taken seriously, but I don’t think we should be creating more restrictions for responsible operators because of the actions of a few. I’d rather see us address specific problems where they exist and make sure proper standards are being followed.
2. Exotic animals as pets: I’d be more inclined to look at restrictions when it comes to exotic animals, particularly species that are difficult to properly care for or could pose a risk to people or the environment. That said, I don’t think we should lump all exotic animals into the same category. There are plenty of snakes, lizards, and other exotic pets that people could responsibly care for.
I’d be open to exploring a more in depth approach that looks at individual species and their needs. I’d also want to understand what regulations are already in place before adding new ones.
I think we can find a reasonable balance between protecting animals and allowing responsible pet ownership.
I would not fully restrict mobile live animal programs as I believe they have some value as long as they are conducted in safe and responsible ways.
Chilliwack
The VHS asked candidates in Chilliwack the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Chilliwack, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”
The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.
The VHS documented concerning incidents at the Chilliwack rodeo over several years, including in 2022 and 2023, with visibly stressed and agitated animals being roughly handled, thrashing around in the chutes, and being put at risk of injury. The VHS also documented electric prod use in 2018 and 2019 at the Chilliwack rodeo.
Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.
Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.
No response received yet.
The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.
If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.
You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.
Yes. I believe animals should be treated humanely and protected from unnecessary pain, fear, and distress.
If elected to Chilliwack City Council, I would support appropriate restrictions or prohibitions on rodeo practices, tools, or handling methods where credible evidence demonstrates that they cause unnecessary suffering or an unreasonable risk of injury to animals.
I would also support reviewing the standards and conditions for animal-based events within the City’s jurisdiction, in consultation with animal-welfare professionals, veterinarians, event organizers, agricultural representatives, and the community. Decisions should be evidence-based, enforceable, and respectful of Chilliwack’s agricultural community.
Traditions can evolve while still respecting their history and community significance.
If a practice cannot be carried out without unnecessary pain, fear, or injury to an animal, I do not believe it should be permitted simply because it is a tradition.
Thank you for reaching out and sharing these concerns. Animal welfare matters to me, and I would want any concerns about mistreatment taken seriously.
At this point, I would reserve my decision on the prohibitions you’re proposing until I’ve reviewed the evidence. I would want to understand what happened, whether any investigations found violations, and what rules and oversight are already in place. I would also want to hear from animal-welfare professionals and the rodeo organizers.
I respect the rodeo’s place in our community, and I believe animal welfare needs to be part of that conversation.
If elected, I would ask City staff to explain the City’s authority and the options available before deciding on restrictions, funding, or other support.
If you have investigation findings or follow-up reports relating to the incidents you’ve mentioned, please send them along with the footage.
That would help me make an informed decision. My approach is to listen, review the facts, and then take a position I can explain and stand behind.
I believe rodeos are an important part of Chilliwack’s agricultural heritage and community identity. They bring people together, celebrate our farming roots, and contribute to local events and traditions. I want to see these traditions continue, but this continuation must never come at the expense of animal wellness. Animal abuse and the unnecessary suffering of animals are absolutely unacceptable, and protecting our community’s traditions must go hand in hand with protecting the animals involved.
If elected, I would support developing and enforcing strict, evidence-based municipal bylaws and event-permit conditions that establish clear animal welfare standards for rodeos held in Chilliwack. This would include prohibiting abusive handling practices, establishing firm restrictions on harmful tools and equipment, veterinary oversight, and procedures to prevent distress. These standards must be enforceable, with meaningful consequences for violations, including penalties or restrictions on future event permits where warranted. Equally important, I would work directly with rodeo organizers, agricultural organizations, animal welfare experts and veterinarians to ensure these events are safe. Those who work with animals have valuable practical knowledge, and meaningful collaboration would help establish standards that are effective.
My goal would be to ensure a community tradition evolves responsibly. Chilliwack can honour its agricultural heritage while setting a clear expectation that animal abuse is non-negotiable. We can work toward keeping rodeos in our community while ensuring animals are treated humanely and unnecessary harm is prevented.
Thank you for this wonderful question and bringing awareness to a very important topic.
Thanks for your question. I support kindness to animals, if elected, I would continue to work for animal kindness in Chilliwack.
Thank you for reaching out and for giving me the opportunity to respond. As someone who has spent much of my life advocating for human rights, dignity, and protection from unnecessary suffering, I believe compassion should extend to animals as well.
How we treat those who cannot speak for themselves reflects our values as a community. I support strong and enforceable animal-welfare standards and would not support practices that unnecessarily cause animals pain, fear, injury, or distress.
At the same time, I notice that the incidents referenced in your question are from 2018, 2019, 2022, and 2023. I would be interested to see the most recent information, and I hope there is an updated report for the 2026 Chilliwack rodeo showing whether practices and animal-welfare standards have improved.
If elected, I would support reviewing current evidence and working with animal-welfare experts, veterinarians, event organizers, and the community to determine what municipal conditions or restrictions are appropriate.
Where a practice is demonstrated to be inhumane, I would support taking action to prevent it and would not support using municipal resources to enable animal cruelty.
I respect Chilliwack’s agricultural heritage and traditions, but tradition and compassion do not have to compete with each other. We can celebrate our history while continuing to improve how animals are treated.
My approach would be based on evidence, compassion, and accountability, and on the most current information available.
Clinton
The VHS asked candidates in Coombs the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Clinton, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”
The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.
The VHS documented concerning incidents at the Clinton rodeo in 2024 and 2026, including visibly stressed and agitated animals; inhumane use of electric prods; and harsh handling including a horse being repeatedly struck in the face and punched in the neck while in a bucking chute; a horse being repeatedly whipped by a rider as they prepared for a steer wrestling event; and a handler striking a visibly stressed bull with a paddle.
Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.
Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.
No response received yet.
The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.
If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.
You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.
No response received yet.
The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.
If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.
You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.
Coombs
The VHS asked candidates in Coombs the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Coombs, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”
The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.
Footage from the Coombs “Bulls, Broncs & Barrels” rodeo in 2024 and 2025 captured inhumane treatment of animals, including repeated electric prod use; harsh handling of a fallen horse; visibly stressed animals thrashing in chutes, rearing up, and resisting handlers. Despite the BC SPCA issuing a notice to rodeo organizers to cease harsh or inhumane training, disciplinary or handling techniques or physical abuse and to cease “excessive” use of electric prods after the 2024 Coombs rodeo, the VHS again documented similar concerns in 2025.
Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.
Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.
Thank you for reaching out and for giving candidates an opportunity to respond to this important issue. I take animal welfare seriously, and I believe animals should be treated humanely and with respect. My record demonstrates that this is more than a statement of principle.
During my eight years as the elected Director for Electoral Area F, I have worked closely with the BC SPCA and others on animal-welfare issues. Most notably, I advocated for stronger provincial protections regarding exotic cats, including servals which was an emergent issue in Area F.
I worked with the BC SPCA, provincial officials, Ministers and other elected representatives to bring this issue forward. I am proud that, effective May 1, 2026, British Columbia implemented legislation prohibiting the breeding, transport and future ownership of non-native, non-domestic cats, including servals.
With respect to rodeos, I believe animals must be treated humanely and that unnecessary cruelty should never be accepted.
The rodeo held in Coombs has received Temporary Use Permits from the Regional District of Nanaimo during my eight years as Director. As an elected representative, I have a responsibility to consider applications within the authority provided to the RDN and to apply the same standards to all applicants.
I would expect any rodeo or other event held in Area F to comply fully with provincial animal-welfare legislation and all applicable RDN requirements. Where credible concerns about animal treatment are brought forward, I believe those concerns should be properly investigated by the appropriate authority and considered in any future regulatory or permitting decisions where the RDN has jurisdiction.
I would not make a commitment to prohibit specific rodeo events or practices without first establishing that the RDN has the legal authority to do so and that such a prohibition is legally enforceable. I believe elected officials have a responsibility to advocate for animal welfare while also respecting the division of authority between local and provincial government.
My work on the provincial exotic-cat legislation demonstrates that when I believe stronger animal-welfare protections are needed, I am prepared to work with organizations such as the BC SPCA, provincial Ministers and other elected representatives to pursue meaningful legislative change.
Delta
The VHS asked candidates in Delta the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Delta? “
Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. They often include a wide range of species, ranging from farmed animals like goats, lambs, and chicks, to wild, exotic species like snakes, lizards, tortoises, and sugar gliders. They can include travelling petting zoos, animal presentations at schools and birthday parties, animal displays at community events, and reptile or exotic pet expos.
These programs can expose animals to frequent transportation, repeated public handling, unfamiliar environments, temporary or undersized enclosures, noise and other stressful conditions, often with limited or no opportunity to retreat from public view or engage in natural behaviours. And because healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella, the risks reach people too, especially young children, older adults, and pregnant people. Many examples of disease outbreaks in connection to mobile live animal programs have been documented in recent years.
The VHS believes local governments can play an important role in determining whether and where MLAPs are permitted to operate. For example, the City of Port Moody has adopted a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.
“Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?”
Many MLAPs feature exotic animals (wild animals native to countries outside Canada) such as snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders. These animals have complex behavioural, social, dietary, and environmental needs that can be extremely difficult to meet in private homes. The promotion and sale of exotic animals at MLAPs can also contribute to impulse purchases, animal surrender, and risks to native wildlife when exotic animals escape or are released.
The VHS supports a science-based “positive list” approach, in which species would only be permitted to be kept as pets after being assessed, using a scoring tool like EMODE, as suitable based on factors such as animal welfare, health, public safety, and environmental considerations.
Local governments can use local bylaws and licensing tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals. For example, the City of Castlegar’s Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw includes provisions addressing exotic pets, animal performance, exhibition, and display.
Thank you for reaching out and for the important work the Vancouver Humane Society does to protect animals and raise awareness about their welfare.
Our much-loved pets have been featured throughout Delta First’s social media campaign. They are part of our families, and we recognize the companionship and joy animals bring to our community.
We appreciate your organization’s work to ensure their welfare receives thoughtful attention.
On your questions:
Mobile live animal programs: The animal-welfare and public-health concerns you have raised deserve careful consideration. I am not taking a position on a blanket prohibition at this time. If elected, I would support reviewing Delta’s approach, with input from animal-welfare and public-health experts, to understand whether additional safeguards or restrictions are needed.
Exotic animals as pets: I recognize the importance of ensuring that animals receive appropriate care and that public safety and our local environment are protected. I would be open to considering stronger local regulation, including learning more about a science-based positive list and licensing options.
Before endorsing a particular approach, I would want to understand Delta’s existing rules, the evidence supporting proposed changes, and how those changes would work in practice. Delta First believes in listening, making informed decisions and being clear with residents about our commitments.
While I cannot endorse the specific measures proposed without further review, I take these concerns seriously and value the Vancouver Humane Society’s contribution to that discussion.
Thank you for giving candidates the opportunity to address these issues and helping residents make informed choices.
If elected, we are excited about working with you and the Vancouver Humane Society as we head into the future.
1. I would not restrict or prohibit live animal programs
2. I would work with people who have animals and those around where they are placed to find out if they are accepted. IF Not I would work with many ways to keep the animals safe if they need to be moved.
3. I would support strengthening local regularion of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets.
4. I would work with family members and mayor and council and community to support the lives of exotic animals even if they need to be moved.
Nanaimo
The VHS asked candidates in Nanaimo the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support restricting or prohibiting mobile live animal programs from operating within Nanaimo? “
Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) involve transporting animals to different locations for display, public entertainment, fundraising, or sale. They often include a wide range of species, ranging from farmed animals like goats, lambs, and chicks, to wild, exotic species like snakes, lizards, tortoises, and sugar gliders. They can include travelling petting zoos, animal presentations at schools and birthday parties, animal displays at community events, and reptile or exotic pet expos.
These programs can expose animals to frequent transportation, repeated public handling, unfamiliar environments, temporary or undersized enclosures, noise and other stressful conditions, often with limited or no opportunity to retreat from public view or engage in natural behaviours. And because healthy-looking animals can carry pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella, the risks reach people too, especially young children, older adults, and pregnant people. Many examples of disease outbreaks in connection to mobile live animal programs have been documented in recent years.
The VHS believes local governments can play an important role in determining whether and where MLAPs are permitted to operate. For example, the City of Port Moody has adopted a corporate policy prohibiting mobile live animal programs on public and private property.
“Would you support strengthening local regulation of exotic animals, including exploring a science-based positive list of species that may be kept as pets and licensing or other tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals?“
Many MLAPs feature exotic animals (wild animals native to countries outside Canada) such as snakes, lizards, tortoises, sugar gliders, and spiders. These animals have complex behavioural, social, dietary, and environmental needs that can be extremely difficult to meet in private homes. The promotion and sale of exotic animals at MLAPs can also contribute to impulse purchases, animal surrender, and risks to native wildlife when exotic animals escape or are released.
The VHS supports a science-based “positive list” approach, in which species would only be permitted to be kept as pets after being assessed, using a scoring tool like EMODE, as suitable based on factors such as animal welfare, health, public safety, and environmental considerations.
Local governments can use local bylaws and licensing tools to regulate the keeping of exotic animals. For example, the City of Castlegar’s Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw includes provisions addressing exotic pets, animal performance, exhibition, and display.
I am a dog person meaning I always have a dog in my life. I advocate for more rights for dogs to go with their humans. I am absolutely against animals showcased in venues of any kind or to be in cages. As Mayor I would not allow animals to be treated disrespectfully.
1. Mobile live animal programs: Yes, I would support restricting mobile live animal programs in Nanaimo. These programs cause animals to suffer unnecessarily and can spread disease to vulnerable people. I would support a motion being brought forward directing staff to report on options to restrict these programs, such as a corporate policy similar to Port Moody’s.
2. Would you support Exotic animals as pets restrictions: Yes. Exotic animals needs often can not be met in a private home, and impulse buys often lead to surrender, neglect or release into the community which causes issues with Native species. I support exploring a science-based positive list, using tools suggested such as EMODE, along with licensing and bylaw provisions similar to Castlegar’s.
If elected, I would support a motion being brought forward directing staff to review the City’s animal control bylaw with these tools in mind.
Thank you for reaching out and for providing the background information on these issues.
At this stage of the campaign, I’m going to respectfully decline to complete the questionnaire. These are very specific policy questions, and I have not had the opportunity to properly examine Nanaimo’s existing regulations, the extent of any local concerns, the evidence surrounding the proposed approaches, or the potential enforcement and financial implications.
One of the commitments I’ve made throughout this campaign is not to take a position simply because I’m asked for one.
Before supporting new regulations, I would want to understand the problem we are trying to solve, the evidence, the alternatives, the cost and how we would measure whether the change was effective.
I appreciate the work your organization does and the information you’ve provided. If elected and these matters come before Council, I would approach them with that same process and would be very willing to hear from your organization as part of that discussion.
Thank you again for including me.
Thank you so much for reaching out and for giving candidates the opportunity to think through these issues.
I appreciate the work the Vancouver Humane Society does to bring animal welfare into the public conversation.
My approach to municipal government is to start with what we already have, understand where the gaps are, and then work collaboratively toward practical improvements. I don’t believe good policy should be written in a vacuum, especially when it involves animal welfare, public health, safety and environmental considerations.
Mobile live animal programs: I would support Council taking a closer look at how Nanaimo currently regulates mobile live animal programs and whether our existing framework is sufficient. Nanaimo already has an Animal Responsibility Bylaw, adopted in 2021 following a review of animal-control services, best-practice research, stakeholder input and public engagement.
It addresses areas including animal welfare, licensing, owner responsibilities and enforcement. I think it is reasonable to ask whether that framework has kept pace with the different types of mobile animal programs we see today.
If elected, I would support asking staff to review the current regulations and identify any gaps, including considerations around animal welfare, public health, public safety, environmental impacts, provincial jurisdiction and our actual ability to enforce any new requirements.
I would also want to learn from what other municipalities have done and hear from the people who work with animals and animal welfare every day. Depending on what that review shows, restrictions or prohibitions may be appropriate in some circumstances.
I would also want to make sure legitimate educational, conservation, agricultural and veterinary activities are considered appropriately.
Exotic animals as pets: I am also supportive of looking at whether Nanaimo’s existing regulations around exotic animals could be strengthened. I find the idea of a science-based positive list worth exploring, particularly if it can help ensure that animals being kept as pets are species whose welfare needs can realistically be met in a home environment.
I would want that conversation to look beyond simply whether an animal is considered “exotic.”
We should consider animal welfare, behavioural and environmental needs, public safety, disease risks, potential impacts on local eco-systems if animals escape or are released, and whether regulations can actually be enforced.
If elected, I would support asking staff to identify what Nanaimo already regulates, where there may be gaps, what authority the City has, and what additional licensing or regulatory tools might be appropriate.
I would also want that process to include veterinarians, animal-welfare organizations, public-health and environmental professionals, relevant Indigenous partners, animal owners and the broader community.
There is also an important jurisdictional piece. Municipal government has a role to play, but it is not the only level of government involved in animal regulation.
I would want Nanaimo’s approach to work within our legal authority and complement provincial requirements rather than simply duplicating them.
Most importantly, I want to be honest about what being a councillor actually means. If elected, I will have one seat at the table. I can bring an issue forward, ask questions, advocate for action and work with Council and staff, but meaningful policy changes require collaboration, evidence and the proper process.
Thank you again for reaching out and for including me in this conversation. I appreciate the opportunity to learn more about these concerns and to consider where Nanaimo may be able to strengthen the work it is already doing.
Thanks so much for your email, and for the information about mobile live animal programs and the keeping of exotic animals in Nanaimo. I wasn’t aware of things like travelling petting zoos and animal presentations at schools or birthday parties in our city, so I appreciate you bringing it to my attention.
As someone who follows a principle of non-harming in my own life, it is very important to me that we are reducing harm to people, animals, and our planet wherever we can. I would like to look into this matter more to get a better understanding of how the science-based “positive list” approach would be applied to these travelling zoos and presentations, but I would absolutely like to see stronger regulations in place around animal welfare. If elected, I would support evidence-based approaches to these types of regulations.
Osooyos
The VHS asked candidates in Osoyoos the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support or oppose the continuation of harness horse racing at Desert Park Raceway in Osoyoos? “
Harness horse racing at Fraser Downs Raceway in Surrey came to an end in 2025. In July 2026, plans were announced to establish Desert Park Raceway as a new harness racing venue.
The VHS has raised concerns about the welfare risks associated with horse racing, including injuries, fatalities, and broader welfare concerns, including coercive training and equipment, and what happens to horses after they are no longer used in racing.
Please briefly explain your position, including whether you would support the Town continuing to facilitate or provide resources to the racing operation and what action you would take if elected.
In 1961 I marched in a parade at the CNE in Toronto for Armed Forces Day as a high school cadet. To thank us, they gave us 1 minute with a fortune teller who told me, “She saw a horse in my future, lots of horses, American and Canadian horses and a long way from Toronto. She also said I would be in a position of authority and would do well.” There was more but time was up and I would marry a girl whose last name started with a ‘Z’.
That was first as I married Eva Maria Zipper on August 11, 1969. I arrived in Osoyoos in 1978 to broadcast the local news and sports on the radio there and immediately got involved with Desert Park Race Track as the track announcer for the next 15 years. I sounded very much like Darryl Wells. I was also the mayor for 3 terms before now and it has been almost 25 years since I was the mayor, howefver I am known as I brought Bryan Adams amd 30,000 people to Desert Park, plus I have brought the Righteous Brothers, BTO. Tom Cochrane and others to Osoyoos. I am totally supportive of the SPCA and have had my picture in newpapers in Midland Ontario in the 1970s for getting a truckload of food for the SPCA through my radio shows and the same out here.
Desert Park is now used for harness racing: a sport governed by rules, just like Thoroughbred and Quarter horse racing. Hockey, baseball, football all have rules yet deaths have occurred in all of those sports. Desert Park is no longer a location for big concerts due to the residential area that now exists across the street plus a lack of parking. When visitors come to Osoyoos, they want to be near, on, or in Lake Osoyoos which takes these events away from the racing track and harness racing with off-track betting has a chance of survival in an industry that casino betting has weakened threatening the continued existence of betting on horses.
As a mayor who has been involved at that location since 1980, continuing down this road is the way to go. It also keeps stables available in case fires require horses to be evacuated from other parts of the province. This really is no different than police expecting us to obey the rules of the road and I expect the racing concerns to be addressed by those producing the races. I have produced large and small concerts including production and emcee work with Red Robinson in Memphis for the 25th anniversary of Elvis’s death in 2002.
The same thing occurs at race time: ‘someone’ is producing the event and that person ensures all rules are followed. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.
I should also add that I am in the Sports Hall of Fame for broadcasting hockey and baseball half a century ago in Ontario, and I was a news director with excellent ratings in Ontario and B.C.
While I appreciate the VHS’s concerns regarding the welfare risks associated with horse racing, research shows that Standardbreds (harness horses) generally experience lower on-track fatality rates compared to Thoroughbreds due to more gradual training methods.
However, intense competition at higher levels still carries risk, which is why Veterinary Technicians must remain present at these races to assist with health monitoring, regulatory compliance, and medical checks.
Generally, I am in favour of harness racing at Desert Park because it brings significant tourism and economic activity to the South Okanagan. These events draw visitors to local businesses, hotels, and restaurants during the shoulder season, which Osoyoos greatly needs. Furthermore, horse racing has deep historical ties to many British Columbia communities. Revitalizing the sport utilizes existing facilities for a unique public attraction while preserving agricultural livelihoods—including grooms, trainers, drivers, and feed suppliers.
Therefore, I support the Town of Osoyoos continuing to facilitate the racing operation, provided it is done with enhanced safety measures. If elected, I would propose to reduce the scheduled number of harness racing events from 22 down to 15, and advocate for reducing the number of horses racing side-by-side from 5 down to 3. This will actively reduce track congestion, lower the risk of collisions, and ensure a safer environment for both the horses and their drivers.
Surrey
The VHS asked candidates in Surrey the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and practices in Surrey, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events; the use of tools like electric prods and flank straps; and forcible handling practices such as ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals?”
The VHS has documented and raised concerns about a number of rodeo events and practices, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events, as well as the use of inhumane handling practices and tools such as electric prods, flank straps, ear and tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving animals. These events, tools, and practices involve the use of fear, pain, and stress to incite animals to flee and buck.
At the 2026 Cloverdale rodeo, a horse and rider fell and were injured during a bucking event.
Municipalities have an important role to play in preventing the inhumane treatment of animals within their jurisdiction and can establish conditions for events and activities held in their communities.
Please briefly explain your position and what specific action you would take if elected, including whether you would support conditions or restrictions on rodeos held within your community, funding or other forms of support.
No response received yet.
The VHS invited candidates to share their views on local animal welfare issues, but has not yet received a response. Please check back before October 17 to see if a candidate has responded.
If you live in this community, you can help us hear from your candidates. Contact the candidates running in your area and ask them to respond to the VHS’s animal welfare questionnaire.
You can also use the VHS Animal Welfare Local Election Guide to learn about key issues in your community and find simple questions and message templates to contact candidates directly.
Thank you for reaching out and for the Vancouver Humane Society’s continued advocacy for animal welfare, humane treatment, and responsible municipal governance.
Yes, I support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, equipment, and handling practices that subject animals to avoidable pain, fear, distress, or risk of injury.
Tradition, entertainment, and commercial interests should not be regarded as sufficient justification for practices that compromise animal welfare. A community’s values are reflected not only in the protections it extends to people, but also in the standards it establishes for the treatment of animals within its jurisdiction.
The reported incident at the 2026 Cloverdale rodeo, in which a horse and rider fell and were injured during a bucking event, underscores the importance of examining the risks associated with these activities.
One incident alone cannot establish the overall incidence of injury across rodeos; nevertheless, it reinforces the need for evidence-based safeguards and a serious assessment of whether particular events and practices are compatible with contemporary animal-welfare standards.
If elected, I would support pursuing municipal restrictions to prohibit rodeo events and practices that involve the deliberate infliction of avoidable distress or unacceptable risks to animal welfare, including roping, wrestling, and bucking events where the evidence demonstrates that the practices cannot be conducted humanely.
I would also support prohibiting electric prods, flank straps used to induce bucking, the pulling or twisting of ears and tails, neck twisting, and the hitting, kicking, or shoving of animals as described in your questionnaire.
My approach would be grounded in prevention, enforceability, and accountability—not merely expressions of concern after an animal has been injured.
Specifically, I would advocate for the following measures:
1. Municipal restrictions and enforceable conditions: Review Surrey’s authority to prohibit specified events and practices or impose enforceable animal-welfare conditions on rodeos and similar events held within municipal jurisdiction.
2. Evidence-based animal-welfare standards: Seek input from qualified veterinarians, animal-welfare organizations, event operators, and relevant regulatory authorities to establish clear requirements grounded in veterinary evidence and the prevention of avoidable suffering.
3. Permitting, monitoring, and enforcement: Support appropriate permit conditions, independent oversight, incident reporting, and meaningful consequences for violations, subject to municipal authority and applicable provincial law.
4. Responsible use of public resources: Support reviewing municipal funding, grants, promotional assistance, and other forms of public support for rodeo events to ensure that public resources do not subsidize activities involving prohibited or demonstrably inhumane practices.
5. Transparent public accountability: Advocate for publicly accessible reporting on animal-welfare requirements, reported incidents, enforcement measures, and compliance outcomes. Municipal action must be legally sound, proportionate, and practically enforceable.
I would therefore work with Surrey’s legal and regulatory teams to identify the strongest available mechanisms for implementing these protections while ensuring that municipal bylaws and permit conditions remain consistent with provincial legislation. Ultimately, animal welfare must be treated as a substantive public responsibility rather than a secondary consideration subordinate to entertainment or tradition.
Where an activity depends on practices that inflict avoidable suffering, the appropriate response is to restrict or prohibit those practices—not to presume that their historical existence makes them acceptable.
Thank you for including this important issue in your 2026 local election questionnaire.
I welcome the opportunity to have this position shared with VHS supporters and the wider Surrey community.
I do support prohibiting inhumane events, tools and practices to all animals. I do not mind to: Sign a petition at the Surrey Council, Lobby with provincial MLS to enforce stricter animal cruelty regulations, Engage with event organizers to encourage the voluntary removal of high risk roping and wrestling segments.
Thank you for reaching out and for your work advocating for animal welfare.
I support prohibiting inhumane rodeo events, tools, and handling practices in Surrey. Community traditions should evolve to ensure animals are treated humanely. Entertainment should never depend on causing animals fear, pain, or distress.
If elected, I would bring forward a motion requesting a staff report on enforceable restrictions, informed by independent veterinary and animal welfare expertise.
This would include prohibiting roping, wrestling, and bucking events that cause animal suffering, along with electric prods, flank straps, and the abusive handling practices listed in your questionnaire.
I would also support making humane treatment a condition of municipal permits, use of City facilities, funding, and other City support, with clear monitoring and consequences for violations. Public funding should support humane community celebrations and activities.
As an independent candidate, I am committed to listening to residents, examining the evidence, and speaking up for responsible decisions at City Hall.
Thank you to the Vancouver Humane Society for raising this important issue.
I support strong and enforceable animal welfare standards for events held in Surrey. Animals should not be subjected to unnecessary pain, fear, stress, or injury for entertainment.
If elected, I would support prohibiting inhumane rodeo practices within Surrey, including the use of electric prods and other harmful tools, as well as forcible practices such as ear or tail pulling and twisting, neck twisting, hitting, kicking, and shoving. I would also support appropriate restrictions on rodeo events where the activity itself creates an unreasonable risk of pain, distress, or injury to animals.
Municipal approval and permitting should include clear animal welfare, safety, and compliance requirements, with appropriate monitoring and enforcement. I would also support reviewing municipal funding or other forms of support to ensure that public resources are not used to facilitate activities involving inhumane treatment of animals.
As a city councillor, I would work with animal welfare organizations, event organizers, veterinarians, and relevant authorities to establish practical, transparent, and enforceable standards for events held in Surrey.
Thank you for your advocacy and for giving candidates an opportunity to address this important community issue.
Vancouver
The VHS asked candidates in Vancouver the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support or oppose efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park?”
Horse racing at Vancouver’s Hastings Racecourse ended in December 2025 following the provincial government’s decision to end public funding for the industry.
This followed years of declining attendance, revenue and race days, increasing reliance on public subsidies, and ongoing horse welfare concerns. The VHS highlighted these issues, including a horse fatality rate at Hastings that was marked higher than the North American industry average, in its June 2025 report.
Despite the end of racing, the horse racing industry is actively pursuing its return to Hastings Park.
“Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Vancouver?”
Vancouver permits horse-drawn carriages to operate in busy urban environments, where horses are exposed to vehicle traffic, noise, pollution, hard surfaces and unpredictable conditions. The VHS has raised concerns about the resulting risks to both horse welfare and public safety.
The VHS has documented carriages operating close to moving vehicles and turning across oncoming traffic at holiday events in busy commercial areas like Kerrisdale, Yaletown, and on Commercial Drive. The VHS has also observed horses displaying potential signs of stress or agitation, including head shaking, bit chewing, and pawing. and pawing.
In recent years, incidents have occurred in Vancouver, Victoria, and Montreal involving carriage horses becoming spooked, falling, or colliding with vehicles, sometimes resulting in injuries to the animals or passengers. Such incidents demonstrate how quickly situations can become unsafe for both animals and people. Cities like Montreal, Chicago, and Salt Lake City have already banned or restricted horse-drawn carriages over similar concerns.
Thank you for inviting me to respond. As an animal lover and humanitarian who has worked with WWF, I believe animal welfare and public safety deserve serious consideration in City decisions.
1. Horse-drawn carriages on busy city streets Yes. I support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets in Vancouver. Horses should not be exposed to dangerous traffic conditions, and the public should not face avoidable safety risks. If elected, I would ask City staff to review current rules and bring forward changes to restrict carriage operations on high-traffic routes.
2. Horse racing at Hastings Park I oppose efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park. Given the end of public funding and the animal welfare concerns raised about the industry, I would not support bringing racing back to the site.
I would work with the Park Board, community groups and other partners on uses for Hastings Park that serve Vancouver residents without relying on horse racing.
Yes. I support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic Vancouver streets. Mixing horses with dense vehicle traffic, noise, hard surfaces and unpredictable urban conditions creates avoidable risks for animals, passengers and the public. If elected, I would ask staff to bring forward an enforceable bylaw that bars commercial horse-drawn carriages from high-traffic streets, supported by clear route definitions, animal-welfare standards and a reasonable transition period. Any narrowly defined exception for a controlled ceremonial event should require a closed or protected route, veterinary safeguards, weather limits and an emergency plan—not ordinary operation in live traffic.
I oppose reinstating horse racing at Hastings Park. The combination of documented animal-welfare concerns, declining attendance and revenue, and dependence on public subsidy does not justify reviving the industry on City-owned land. If elected, I would oppose City funding or a new lease intended to restore racing and would support a transparent, public process to plan a safer and financially responsible future for Hastings Park, including community, recreation, cultural and green-space uses. Any interim site decisions should include meaningful consultation with workers, neighbouring communities and Indigenous partners.
OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.
OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.
We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.
Horses are living animals, not props for entertainment, and they shouldn’t have to navigate congested streets alongside cars, buses, cyclists and unpredictable urban traffic. We have a responsibility to protect both animal welfare and public safety.
If elected, I would push for a review of the current permitting system, stronger restrictions on where carriages can operate, and ultimately a prohibition on operating in high-traffic areas. Vancouver can celebrate its traditions and create memorable experiences without putting animals or people at unnecessary risk.
The industry has had years to demonstrate that it can operate sustainably and responsibly, and the declining attendance, growing reliance on public subsidies, and serious horse welfare concerns make a strong case for moving on. Horses should not be put at risk to sustain an industry that is no longer financially viable.
If elected, I would oppose any use of public funds to revive horse racing and work with the Park Board and other levels of government to ensure Hastings Park is developed as a welcoming public space that serves the community, protects animals, and creates opportunities for recreation, culture and green space.
OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.
OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.
We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.
Typically on issues like this I would need a lot more information.
Current elected officials often receive briefings and reports from city staff on specific issues of concern. Making an informed decision is important.
As an elected official that would mean speaking with stakeholders, understanding the problem or dangers posed, exploring alternatives or mitigative measures, receiving city staff data and report, etc.
I’m not trying to not answer your questions but it wouldn’t be wise of me to provide an opinion on any issue unless I have more than a short email of information and no engagement with stakeholders to fully understand what I am forming an opinion on.
I would do similar on any important issue.
Thank you for reaching out to me.
OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.
OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.
We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.
OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.
OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.
We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.
Thanks for getting in touch. I don’t believe that there should be horse carriages on busy, high-traffic streets and I would commit to finding a legislative or regulatory path to prohibit it.
I would also oppose returning horse racing to Hastings Park. The problems with Hastings Park racing were long-standing, and the information in the report that you attached unfortunately doesn’t surprise me.
I also don’t think it would be feasible even if someone at the city were to champion it. Site conditions were already substandard and the backstretch has since been dismantled. It’s not viable and we should move on to other ideas for the site.
OneCity Council candidates are committed to prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets and opposing efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park.
OneCity candidates are dedicated to advancing animal welfare in Vancouver. We support instructing staff to review permitting rules to prohibit horse-drawn carriages on busy, high-traffic streets to protect animals and for the security of all road users.
We would oppose the efforts to reinstate horse racing at Hastings Park, given the racing-related fatality rate for horses and in the interest of not further expanding the gambling industry in our city.
I would support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Vancouver. Safety should be a priority for everyone, including the horses themselves. Busy urban environments present potential risks due to vehicle traffic, noise, and unpredictable conditions. I believe we should look at ways to protect both animal welfare and public safety, and I would support exploring appropriate restrictions through City policy.
Personally, I am not in favour of horse racing returning to Hastings Park. However, I believe decisions of this nature should be informed by evidence, animal welfare standards, and community feedback. Before considering any potential return, I would want to understand what safeguards would be required, how they would be monitored and enforced, and what the implications would be for the horses and the community.
If elected, I would listen to residents and relevant experts, review the available evidence, and consider whether a clear, enforceable plan could adequately address animal welfare concerns before determining how to proceed.
“Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating in Stanley Park?”
Horse-drawn carriages operate in Stanley Park, exposing horses to busy and unpredictable urban conditions. The VHS has raised concerns about the resulting risks to horse welfare and public safety.
In 2016, horses pulling a carriage full of tourists through Stanley Park were spooked by traffic. The frightened animals bolted off the roadway, crossing a bike path and smashing a park bench before nearly taking the carriage over the seawall. Fortunately, no horses or people were seriously hurt, but the incident demonstrates how quickly this situation can become unsafe for both animals and people.
In recent years, incidents have occurred elsewhere, including in Victoria and Montreal, involving carriage horses becoming spooked, falling, or colliding with vehicles, sometimes resulting in injuries to the animals or passengers. Cities like Montreal, Chicago, and Salt Lake City have already banned or restricted horse-drawn carriages over similar concerns.
I am in favour of exploring a well-managed end to the horse-drawn carriages in Stanley Park. Given the increased summer temperatures we have been experiencing in BC, it is unsafe for the animals (and for nearby people) to be waiting and operating on pavement during the summer months.
Further, as you referenced, moments when the horses are startled pose an unnecessary risk to park patrons and to the horses’ well-being. I would want to ensure that the horses are able to be retired in an ethical way, and to work alongside the business owner for a timely and appropriate wind-down of operations.
Given the possibility of introducing Neighbourhood Zero Emission Vehicles to continue park tours humanely, it feels appropriate and timely to make this decision before any further threats to safety or wellbeing emerge.
I think it’s absolutely ridiculous that there’s still horse drawn carriages in Stanley Park. It’s a lose lose. Cruelty to the animals that shouldn’t be forced to work AND was one of the reasons the bike lane’s got removed as well if I recall correctly since people complained “it held up traffic too much” with one lane (separate issue but we also need more bike lanes, I digress).
Thank you for reaching out to me as this is an issue that is close to my heart. As a vegan and animal rights advocate for the past decade, the use of animals for profit and entertainment is not something I support.
While the horse drawn carriages are a beloved institution of Stanley Park, it would be my responsibility as a Park Board Commissioner to move forward a motion to financially support Stanley Park Horse Drawn Tours in the transition to electrify their fleet and remove the use of animals in their business.
Thank you very much for all of the work that the VHS does, and for taking the time to send this question to candidates.
I look forward to everyone’s responses.
Yes I would support prohibiting horse drawn carriages from operating in Stanley Park for all the reasons you have listed. I’ve always felt concern for the horses having to work on concrete all day, having to pull the carriage up that steep hill towards Prospect Point, and having cars and bikes pass fairly closely.
Victoria
The VHS asked candidates in Victoria the below question based on animal welfare issues connected to their community. Click the drop-downs to read the background information and candidates responses.
“Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Victoria? “
The City of Victoria permits horse-drawn sightseeing carriages to operate on city streets. Horse carriages in Victoria operate in an urban environment alongside cars, buses, bicycles, pedestrians and other traffic. This exposes horses to vehicle noise, traffic congestion, hard road surfaces and unpredictable situations that can create risks to both animal welfare and public safety.
Victoria has also experienced multiple incidents demonstrating how quickly these risks can escalate.
In 2018, a horse-drawn carriage in downtown Victoria was bumped by a bus, causing both horses to fall onto the roadway. In 2023, a spooked carriage horse fled for several blocks before falling near a bike lane, resulting in injuries to the horse and driver. More recently, in April 2024, a carriage horse became spooked at an intersection. The driver lost control and passengers jumped out of the carriage before the horse collapsed on the ground. Cities like Montreal, Chicago, and Salt Lake City have already banned or restricted horse-drawn carriages over similar concerns.
Thank you for reaching out and providing the opportunity to share my position on horse-drawn carriages in Victoria.
I recognize the importance of animal welfare and public safety, and I appreciate the concerns raised by the Vancouver Humane Society.
Horse-drawn carriages have been a longstanding part of Victoria’s heritage and tourism industry. I support their continued operation, provided that strong animal welfare and public safety standards are maintained and properly enforced.
I do not support a blanket prohibition on horse-drawn carriages operating on Victoria’s streets. However, I recognize that certain high-traffic areas may present additional challenges, and I believe any legitimate safety concerns deserve careful consideration.
If elected Mayor, I would support reviewing existing operating regulations, traffic safety requirements and enforcement practices to ensure they adequately protect horses, carriage operators, passengers and other road users.
Where evidence demonstrates that particular routes or operating conditions create unacceptable safety risks, I would support considering reasonable adjustments, including route restrictions where warranted.
I also believe carriage operators must be held accountable for complying with animal welfare requirements and municipal bylaws. Complaints and reported incidents should be taken seriously, investigated appropriately and addressed through consistent enforcement.
My approach would be to preserve this longstanding Victoria tradition while ensuring that animal welfare and public safety remain priorities. I believe we can achieve both through responsible oversight, meaningful consultation and evidence-based decisions rather than an outright ban.
I will be proposing an outright ban on the horse-drawn carriages as horses are people and to condemn them to slavery is abominable.
Thank you for reaching out and sharing your concerns regarding horse-drawn carriages in Victoria.
The campaign has received a number of concerns regarding the operation of these tours and the condition of the horses, which warrants a thorough review. Given the importance of both animal wellbeing and community safety, I believe it would be premature to announce a definitive position while outside of office, absent such a review.
I am currently evaluating the option of not renewing the existing permit, though I remain deeply concerned about the welfare of the horses if that were to occur. My priority is to look at this issue carefully, ideally with the assistance of the SPCA, to ensure any path forward is both responsible and humane.
Thank you for the work you do and for the opportunity to share my perspective on this matter.
Your point of view depends on where you are coming from.
In New York City tourists really like taking a carriage ride through Central Park. The locals do not. Are the animals fairly treated?
If the carriages are not allowed on busy streets, is Beacon Hill Park enough?
Yes, it is frustrating behind one in James Bay. However the way streets are in Victoria now, it is not much different.
I feel it is a question for the Humane Society to answer, not some politician. Whatever choice the Humane Society makes, I will enforce it.
Thank you for inviting my response. Animal welfare and public safety should guide the City’s approach to horse-drawn carriages.
I would support restricting their operation on streets where an evidence-based assessment identifies risks that cannot be adequately addressed.
If elected, I would seek a review of permitted routes, traffic conditions, incident records and operating standards, informed by independent equine-welfare expertise and consultation with residents and operators.
Where that review demonstrates unacceptable risks, I would support prohibiting carriage operations on those routes.
You bring up an excellent and important topic that has come up in door-knocking discussions and meetings with residents.
Yes. I support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from busy, high-traffic streets where horses must operate beside buses, trucks, cars, bicycles and pedestrians. The incidents described are not abstract. They show that one collision, sudden noise or unexpected movement can injure a horse, driver, passenger or other road user. Tradition cannot outweigh a preventable safety risk.
If elected, within my first 90 days I would ask Council to direct staff to amend the Vehicles for Hire Bylaw. The review should identify restricted streets and intersections using objective criteria: traffic volume and speed, transit activity, bike-lane conflicts, construction, road width, and collision or incident history.
It should include the Vancouver Humane Society, animal welfare and veterinary experts, carriage operators, VicPD, transportation staff and affected neighbourhoods. I would also request immediate interim safety options available under the City’s existing licensing authority, mandatory reporting of every carriage-related incident, and annual public reporting.
The result should be enforceable route restrictions, not voluntary guidelines. Operators should receive a defined transition period and an opportunity to move to safer routes or alternatives such as electric heritage style vehicles. The timetable must protect animals and the public, not preserve the status quo indefinitely.
Victoria can preserve heritage tourism without exposing horses and people to unnecessary risk. This is a practical, balanced step the City can take, and I would support it.
I’ve already committed to a ban on horse carriages. I say it is an anachronistic practice and would see it ended in favour of pedicab services already in place. I’m already aware that horse carriages have caused several accidents over the years and raised legitimate concerns about animal welfare, including operation during heat waves. I would simply refuse to renew the permit once it expires.
This is my fourth time running. And to be honest, my opinion has changed recently thanks to some conversations that I had recently a greeting meet this year. Here are your answers.
Would you support prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from operating on busy, high-traffic streets in Victoria?
yes.
Please briefly explain your position and what action you would take if elected.
I believe we should set up a permanent plan to phase out horse drawn carriages from the city of Victoria.
We should vote this through immediately as I know it will take a few years to allow the horses to live out there lifespan doing what they were bred to do. Sooner the better.
Thank you for reaching out and for providing this information. I appreciate the work the Vancouver Humane Society does to advocate for animal welfare. Animal welfare and public safety are both important considerations, and I certainly recognize the concerns you’ve raised regarding horse-drawn carriages operating in busy urban environments.
However, I don’t believe in making decisions without first having a thorough understanding of all the facts and potential consequences. Before taking a position on prohibiting horse-drawn carriages from certain streets, I would want to better understand several factors, including the health and welfare of the horses, existing safety regulations, the frequency and circumstances of incidents, and whether additional safeguards could effectively address the concerns.
I would also want to understand the economic impact on the operators, employees and Victoria’s tourism industry, as well as what would happen to the horses if restrictions significantly affected or ended these operations.
I believe it’s important to hear from animal welfare organizations, veterinarians, carriage operators, employees and other affected parties before making a decision. If elected, I would support a comprehensive review of the issue, including current animal welfare standards, safety records, economic implications and potential alternatives.
I am not opposed to change when there is evidence that change is necessary. However, I believe decisions should be based on facts, consultation and a clear understanding of the consequences rather than committing to a particular outcome before that work has been done.
Thank you again for the opportunity to respond.
I have not yet taken a position on prohibiting horse-drawn carriages on busy streets. Through your work with the Humane Society, you are close to this issue and may have strong views. I would be very open to hearing more from you about the current standards.
As a candidate, I want to hear the relevant issues and understand who would be affected, including the animals. Animal welfare is at the core of this issue. If elected, I would listen to the people of Victoria and vote according to what they tell me is important to them.
You can make animal welfare part of the conversation about the future of our communities!
On October 17, 2026, voters across B.C. will head to the polls to elect mayors, councillors, regional representatives and school trustees.
While local elections may focus on issues like housing, transportation, parks, and community safety, there is another important issue that deserves a place on the ballot: animal welfare.
That means voters have an important opportunity to ask: “What will you do to make our communities safer and more compassionate for animals?”
Authorized by Vancouver Humane Society, registered sponsor under LECFA, (604) 266-9744
