Categories
News/Blog

A rare return: What Jorge the turtle reveals about captivity

After more than four decades in captivity, a loggerhead sea turtle named Jorge is finally swimming free—an outcome that once seemed almost impossible. His story, shared earlier this year in the National Geographic, highlights both the power of public advocacy and the deep, lasting harms that captive display can cause to wild animals.

After 41 years in captivity, this celebrity sea turtle is finally swimming home

Here’s how Jorge the sea turtle prepared for the improbable journey-decades after he was found tangled in a fishing net off the coast of Argentina.

A remarkable return after 41 years in captivity

Jorge was rescued as a young turtle in 1984 after becoming tangled in fishing nets off the coast of Argentina. Instead of being rehabilitated and returned to the ocean—a practice that was uncommon at the time—he was sent hundreds of miles inland to an aquarium in Mendoza. There, he spent more than half his life in a shallow tank, far from the ocean, fed an unnatural diet, and deprived of the complex conditions sea turtles need to thrive.

For decades, Jorge became a local celebrity. But as awareness grew about the impacts of captivity on wild animals, public concern grew as well. Eventually, more than 60,000 people signed a petition calling for Jorge’s release, and environmental lawyers filed a lawsuit to push for his return to the sea.

That advocacy worked.

In 2021, a coalition of researchers, veterinarians, and conservation institutions began a careful three-year rehabilitation process to determine whether Jorge could survive in the wild. Through gradual reintroduction to saltwater, live prey, ocean-like temperatures, and currents, Jorge relearned skills he had almost lost. In April 2025, at roughly 60 years old, he was released into the Atlantic Ocean.

It was his first time swimming freely in open water in four decades.

Satellite tracking showed Jorge travelling north toward the warm waters of Brazil, the region he knew as a young turtle. Against the odds, he is navigating currents, hunting, resting, and behaving like a wild sea turtle once again.

Jorge’s story shows advocacy can change animals’ lives

Jorge’s freedom did not happen by accident. It happened because tens of thousands of people spoke up, signed petitions, applied legal pressure, and refused to accept that lifelong captivity was the only option for a healthy wild animal.

This is a powerful reminder that advocacy matters. Public voices can influence policy decisions, challenge outdated practices, and create opportunities for animals who have long been denied their natural lives. Without sustained public pressure, Jorge would likely still be swimming in circles in a shallow tank instead of enjoying his freedom in his home waters.

Captive display prevents wild animals from thriving

As hopeful as Jorge’s story is, it also underscores a sobering reality: captivity prevented him from living as a sea turtle for most of his life.

During his decades in confinement, Jorge lost essential survival instincts. He did not know how to hunt, navigate open waters, or respond to other animals in his environment. His rehabilitation required years of intensive, expert intervention—resources that are rarely available for most captive animals.

Captive wildlife are unable to engage in many natural behaviours that are crucial to their physical, social and psychological well-being. Even well-intentioned facilities struggle to replicate the vast space, social complexity, sensory stimulation, and choice that animals experience in the wild.

As Jorge’s case shows, captivity can strip animals of the skills they need to survive, leaving them dependent on human care.

Most captive animals will never return to the wild

Jorge is an exception, not the rule.

Many animals who are kept in captivity for long periods are not releasable. Animals accustomed to human interaction, proximity, and feeding often lose their fear of people, struggle to forage independently, or lack the social and survival skills needed in the wild. This is especially true for animals bred in captivity, who may never have learned natural behaviours at all.

Once wild instincts are lost, release can be dangerous or fatal for animals. This is why prevention matters so deeply.

The most effective way to ensure wild animals remain wild is to stop keeping and breeding wild, exotic animals in captivity in the first place. Rather than continuing systems that breed or import animals who cannot be released, we must shift toward models that prioritize animal well-being.

That means transitioning zoos and aquariums away from permanent display of wild animals and toward sanctuary-based models that focus on rescue, rehabilitation, and release of injured or displaced native wildlife. Sanctuaries exist to serve animals—not to use them as attractions—and they recognize that freedom, not entertainment, is the ultimate goal.

Take action on zoos & aquariums
Take action on exotic animal rules

Jorge’s story brings hope & learning

Jorge’s journey is inspiring, but it should not distract us from the larger truth it reveals. No animal should have to spend 40+ years in captivity before we finally ask if a small enclosure is the best place for them to thrive.

His story shows us what can happen when advocacy succeeds, and why we must work to ensure fewer animals need such extraordinary intervention again.

Wild animals belong in the wild, and protecting them starts with the choices we make today.

Categories
News/Blog

Union of B.C. Municipalities calls on province to regulate mobile live animal programs and strengthen exotic animal rules

  • The Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM), which represents local governments across B.C., recently voted to endorse resolution NR75Mobile live animal programs 
  • This resolution calls on the provincial government to regulate mobile live animal programs and to strengthen exotic animal rules. 
  • Mobile live animal programs, such as travelling petting zoos, presentations and displays, or exotic animal events where animals can be purchased, are connected to animal welfare concerns and public health and safety risks. 
  • 2,450 messages were sent to UBCM delegates in support of resolution NR75. Thank you to everyone that advocated for stronger protections for animals! 

What happens next?

  • This vote signals that this issue is important to municipalities across B.C. and that provincial leadership is needed to ensure the health, safety, and wellbeing of animals, people, and the environment. 
  • Resolutions endorsed by the UBCM must be acknowledged and responded to by the provincial government.  
  • Help us take the next step by telling the provincial government that this issue is important to you and requires provincial leadership! 

TAKE ACTION: Add your name to the VHS’s campaign asking the provincial government to take meaningful action on this issue by implementing the UBCM’s recommendations. 

Tell the B.C. government to act!
Learn More

Learn more

Exotic animals are wild animals from other countries often imported to Canada through the exotic pet trade. These animals are not domesticated, even if bred in captivity, and their welfare can suffer when sold, bred, transported, or displayed. The exotic pet trade also poses risks to the environment and public health and safety.  

Animal welfare issues

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) can take many forms, including travelling petting zoos, presentations, and expos where animals can be purchased. They involve the transport of animals to a location for display, public entertainment, or sale to the public, and feature a variety of different animals.

MLAPs often include exotic animals—wild animals from other countries imported to Canada—such as spiders, snakes, lizards, and tortoises.    

Animals involved in MLAPs face many animal welfare risks, including:

  • Travel to and from events
  • The public handling of animals
  • Unregulated housing and breeding practices outside of events where they may face restricted movement due to lack of space
  • Limited behavioural opportunities
  • Abnormal social groupings, such as highly social animals being housed alone
  • Exposure to unnatural environmental conditions (lighting, temperature, substrate, sounds, odours)

Environmental risks

The accidental or intentional release of exotic pets (e.g. when pets are no longer wanted but a new home cannot be found for them) can introduce invasive species to our ecosystems. Some invasive species who have impacted our local ecosystems include the red-eared slider turtle, goldfish, and American bullfrog.  

Invasive species can threaten native wildlife, compromise habitats, and spread new diseases.   

Public health & safety concerns

While the risk of disease transmission is always present when interacting with exotic animals, MLAPs increase risk due to:

  • The number of animals and variety of species
  • High amount of close human contact
  • Difficulties in following hygiene protocols (if present)

These risks are particularly prevalent at events marketed to children.

The transportation and frequent handling of animals at these events presents a significant risk factor for stress, and stressed animals may also be more likely to bite or scratch, compounding risks of disease transmission and physical harm. 

Community impacts

Escaped or released animals and the surrender of unwanted exotic pets stress already overwhelmed shelters, rescues, and veterinary services, which may not have the resources and expertise to accommodate such a wide range of exotic species.

There have been many documented instances of escaped or released exotic pets in B.C. in recent years.

Outdated regulations leave exotic animals at risk

Currently, there are no provincial regulations in place that are specific to MLAPs and there is a lack of consistent and enforceable standards for keeping, breeding, displaying, and selling exotic pets.  

B.C.’s Controlled Alien Species Regulation (CASR), introduced in 2009, has banned ownership of more than 1,000 dangerous species like tigers and venomous snakes that pose a threat to people, property, and wildlife.

However, the CASR does not address animal welfare or disease risks, making many exotic species that suffer in captivity or can spread zoonotic diseases still legal to own and trade. 

UBCM resolution NR75 – Mobile Live Animal Programs calls on the B.C. government to:

  • Regulate mobile live animal programs to address animal welfare concerns and public health and safety risks; 
  • Update the Controlled Alien Species Regulation to equally prioritize animal welfare considerations alongside public safety and prohibit the import of all exotic species.

TAKE ACTION: Add your name to the call to action to show your support for this resolution!

ADD YOUR VOICE
Categories
News/Blog

Help push Canada toward a future without animal testing 

Image credit: Jo-Anne McArthur We Animals Media

  • Each year in Canada, 3 to 5 million animals, like beagles, rabbits and mice, are used in scientific research and toxicity testing, as reported by the Canadian Council on Animal Care.  
  • In 2024, nearly 100,000 animals were subjected to procedures causing severe pain or distress.  
  • There is growing evidence to suggest that animal studies fail to reliably predict human outcomes. 
  • Despite the urgent need for better, more human-relevant science, Canada’s progress has been slow.
  • Last year, the Canadian Centre for Alternatives to Animal Methods (CCAAM), one of the country’s leading programs for alternatives to animal-use, closed due to a lack of funding.

TAKE ACTION: Sign the new official federal e-petition calling on Canada to do better. Tell the federal government that transitioning to animal-free research and testing is important to you!

When you sign an official federal e-petition, you’ll get an email asking you to confirm your signature. Your signature doesn’t count until you click that confirmation link.

SIGN THE PETITION
Learn More

Image credit: Jo-Anne McArthur + Media Roger Kingbird / We Animals.

Why change is needed

Despite Canada committing to reduce animal testing for chemical safety in 2022, and a 2025 federal strategy under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) to replace, reduce, or refine the use of vertebrate animals in toxicity testing, the strategy does not include targets, timelines or dedicated funding.  

Federal e-petition 6841 asks for:

  • A coordinated national effort to transition away from animal models;  
  • Measurable targets to reduce animal use in research and regulatory testing (50% reduction by 2030, full replacement where feasible by 2035); 
  • Sustainable federal funding to establish a national centre to lead the transition to animal-free research and testing; 
  • A mandate to prioritize non-animal methods, with replacement as the default; 
  • Federally recognize non-animal methods as the standard by amending federal laws and regulations; 
  • Establish mandatory public reporting on non-animal method adoption rates, federal funding, and animal use in public and private sectors. 

Public support for humane science

Canada is falling behind countries like the United States and those in the European Union, which have developed strategies and investments in new methods that do not use animals. Canadians overwhelmingly agree that it’s time for Canada to catch up.  

  • 83% of Canadians believe that whenever modern scientific alternatives are available, they should be used instead of subjecting animals to painful experiments;1 
  • On average, Canadians rate the importance of considering animal welfare in research decisions at an 8 out of 10, reflecting strong public concern for the treatment of animals used in science; 
  • When asked how important it is to find effective alternatives to the use of animals in science and medicine, Canadians gave an average score of 7.7 out of 10. 

Sign the official federal government petition

Join fellow Canadians in calling for a transition to animal-free research and testing! 

TAKE ACTION

1 According to a Léger Marketing survey conducted for the Montreal SPCA from September 19 to 21, 2025, among 1,521 Canadians.

2 Nanos Research. Public Opinion Survey on the Use of Animals in Canadian Science (October 2024), conducted for the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). https://ccac.ca/Documents/About/CCAC_NANOS_EN-02-2025.pdf

Categories
News/Blog

UPDATE: UBCM Executive to vote on mobile live animal programs & exotic pet regulations

Success!

After 2,450 messages were sent to speak up for exotic animals and mobile live animal programs, the UBCM Executive voted to endorse resolution NR75! Please see the Current Campaigns page for more ways you can help exotic animals, including asking the B.C. government to act on the UBCM’s call for change.

  • In September, the Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM), which represents local governments across B.C., held its annual convention.
  • A resolution brought forward called on the B.C. government to regulate mobile live animal programs – such as mobile petting zoos and exotic pet expos – and strengthen rules for keeping exotic (non-native, non-domesticated) species.
  • More than 1,000 B.C. residents wrote to their local governments, urging them to support resolution NR75Mobile Live Animal Programs.
  • UBCM members ran out of time to vote on resolution NR75 during the convention.
  • The resolution will now be considered by the UBCM Executive at their quarterly meeting on November 12-14.

TAKE ACTION: Add your name to the VHS’s campaign urging the UBCM President & Executive to support protections for animals used in mobile live animal programs and to call for stronger provincial safeguards for exotic animals kept, sold, bred, or traded as pets.

Tell UBCM Executive to vote YES to NR75
Learn More

This action has now ended.

2,450 messages were sent using the quick action tool to support UBCM resolution NR75. Thank you for taking action.

See more campaigns

Learn more

Exotic animals are wild animals from other countries often imported to Canada through the exotic pet trade. These animals are not domesticated, even if bred in captivity, and their welfare can suffer when sold, bred, transported, or displayed. The exotic pet trade also poses risks to the environment and public health and safety.  

Animal welfare issues

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) can take many forms, including travelling petting zoos, presentations, and expos where animals can be purchased. They involve the transport of animals to a location for display, public entertainment, or sale to the public, and feature a variety of different animals.

MLAPs often include exotic animals—wild animals from other countries imported to Canada—such as spiders, snakes, lizards, and tortoises.    

Animals involved in MLAPs face many animal welfare risks, including:

  • Travel to and from events
  • The public handling of animals
  • Unregulated housing and breeding practices outside of events where they may face restricted movement due to lack of space
  • Limited behavioural opportunities
  • Abnormal social groupings, such as highly social animals being housed alone
  • Exposure to unnatural environmental conditions (lighting, temperature, substrate, sounds, odours)

Environmental risks

The accidental or intentional release of exotic pets (e.g. when pets are no longer wanted but a new home cannot be found for them) can introduce invasive species to our ecosystems. Some invasive species who have impacted our local ecosystems include the red-eared slider turtle, goldfish, and American bullfrog.  

Invasive species can threaten native wildlife, compromise habitats, and spread new diseases.   

Public health & safety concerns

While the risk of disease transmission is always present when interacting with exotic animals, MLAPs increase risk due to:

  • The number of animals and variety of species
  • High amount of close human contact
  • Difficulties in following hygiene protocols (if present)

These risks are particularly prevalent at events marketed to children.

The transportation and frequent handling of animals at these events presents a significant risk factor for stress, and stressed animals may also be more likely to bite or scratch, compounding risks of disease transmission and physical harm. 

Community impacts

Escaped or released animals and the surrender of unwanted exotic pets stress already overwhelmed shelters, rescues, and veterinary services, which may not have the resources and expertise to accommodate such a wide range of exotic species.

There have been many documented instances of escaped or released exotic pets in B.C. in recent years.

Outdated regulations leave exotic animals at risk

Currently, there are no provincial regulations in place that are specific to MLAPs and there is a lack of consistent and enforceable standards for keeping, breeding, displaying, and selling exotic pets.  

B.C.’s Controlled Alien Species Regulation (CASR), introduced in 2009, has banned ownership of more than 1,000 dangerous species like tigers and venomous snakes that pose a threat to people, property, and wildlife.

However, the CASR does not address animal welfare or disease risks, making many exotic species that suffer in captivity or can spread zoonotic diseases still legal to own and trade. 

UBCM resolution NR75 – Mobile Live Animal Programs calls on the B.C. government to:

  • Regulate mobile live animal programs to address animal welfare concerns and public health and safety risks; 
  • Update the Controlled Alien Species Regulation to equally prioritize animal welfare considerations alongside public safety, and prohibit the import, keeping, breeding and transport of all exotic species. 

TAKE ACTION: Sign the letter to show your support for this resolution!

ADD YOUR VOICE
Categories
News/Blog

Driving change for animals used in entertainment and the exotic pet trade

Thanks to your support, the VHS has been speaking up for some of B.C.’s most vulnerable animals: those used in mobile live animal programs and kept as exotic pets.

Mobile animal programs, which include travelling petting zoos and expos, often involve transporting animals like snakes, lizards, and tortoises for prolonged periods, housing them in barren containers, and handling them frequently. These stressful conditions raise serious concerns for animal welfare.

In September, more than 1,300 caring advocates like you took action through a VHS campaign, urging their local leaders to support a resolution calling for provincial regulations on these programs. The resolution, introduced by Port Moody, was brought to the Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM).

The resolution did not go to vote and will be moving to the UBCM Executive Committee. The VHS team continues to advocate for a positive outcome on this important item.

The VHS also supported a proposed provincial ban on the sale, breeding, and future ownership of all exotic cat species, while advocating for stronger protections for other animals. These animals suffer in captivity, pose safety risks, and can threaten native wildlife. More than 800 animal supporters used the quick action to share their support before the public consultation closed.

Read opinion piece in the Daily Hive
Categories
News/Blog

Take action for animals at Marineland!

Humane Canada, of which the VHS is a member organization, needs our help to speak up for animals in captivity at Marineland! 

  • In 2019, Canada banned the keeping of whales, dolphins and porpoises for breeding or entertainment in Canada through the Ending the Captivity of Whales and Dolphins Act. 
  • Since this important federal law was passed in 2019, more than 20 animals have died at Marineland.  
  • Earlier this year, Marineland requested a permit from the federal government to export their 30 remaining beluga whales to the Chimelong Ocean Kingdom aquarium in China where they would endure stressful and dangerous transport and a continued life in captivity for public entertainment. 
  • Marineland’s request was denied, and now they are threatening to euthanize the 30 remaining belugas in their care if financial support is not received from the federal government.  

Join Humane Canada and animal allies across Canada to call on the Ontario government to step up for animal welfare and assist in finding alternative solutions! 

Share your voice for marine mammals in captivity (Humane Canada action)

Learn more

What are Humane Canada and other animal organizations asking for?

Humane Canada and other organizations, including the Vancouver Humane Society, are deeply concerned about the ongoing welfare of animals at Marineland in Niagara Falls. While we applaud the federal government’s decision to decline a permit for Marineland to export their beluga whales to China, and the passing of the Ending Captivity of Whales and Dolphins Act in 2019, action must be taken by the Ontario government to protect the animals at Marineland. 

Humane Canada and other expert partners including the Whale Sanctuary project and World Animal Protection have repeatedly offered to assist in finding humane outcomes for these animals. Recent deaths of marine mammals and threats of euthanasia from Marineland demonstrate the urgent need for action. 

Humane Canada and compassionate allies are asking for the Government of Ontario to:

  • Direct Ontario’s Provincial Animal Welfare Services (PAWS) to step in right away to seize the animals in situ and ensure their welfare and safety, which is at immediate risk. Marineland has stated that the whales will be euthanized if the federal government fails to approve the export permits;
  • Convene a group of independent marine mammal experts to assess the whales’ current condition and work to improve care standards on-site;  
  • Determine the next steps for these whales based on expert advice and in accordance with the whales’ well-being and best interests.   

No Title

No Description

Categories
News/Blog

Proposal to regulate mobile petting zoos in B.C. cites ‘distress’ for animals

  • Port Moody Councillor Kyla Knowles introduced a resolution at the UBCM calling for regulations on mobile live animal programs, citing animal welfare, zoonotic disease risks, and public safety.
  • The Vancouver Humane Society supports the resolution, highlighting the lack of minimum standards for animal care in mobile programs.
  • The resolution also urges the province to update the Controlled Alien Species Regulation to include stronger welfare protections and restrictions on exotic species transport, breeding, and display.

Read media coverage on the report and the VHS’s campaign below. Stay tuned for updates!

Proposal to regulate mobile petting zoos in B.C. cites ‘distress’ for animals

Proposal to regulate mobile live petting zoos in B.C. is based on animal welfare concerns, advocate says.

“It seems cruel to take these animals from event to event, from party to party,” said Knowles.

Knowles said the issue came to the city’s attention through public complaints about an operator who regularly made presentations at the city’s Golden Spike Days.

“This particular operator had exotic lizards, turtles and snakes. People and kids would line up and take their turns holding them, posing with them. It just seemed cruel to watch these animals being handed from one child to another,” said Knowles after observing the operator at an event.

“The resolution is about oversight and regulation. The problem is that there are independent, private, for-profit operators in this space, and we have no idea how they are being operated,” said Knowles.

Said Emily Pickett, campaign director of the Vancouver Humane Society: “We don’t know how many of these groups there are, that’s part of the problem.”

Read article
Learn more and take action
Categories
Opinion

B.C. needs to do more than ban exotic cats

Article originally published in the Daily Hive. Written by Chantelle Archambault, communications director at the Vancouver Humane Society, and Erin Ryan, the wildlife campaign manager at World Animal Protection.

Opinion: B.C. needs to do more than ban exotic cats | Lifestyle

The proposed ban addresses one aspect of a much larger problem.

Read & comment
Learn more & take action

The clock is ticking for B.C. residents to weigh in on the province’s proposed ban on breeding, selling, and owning exotic cats — wild animals like servals and caracals that are often kept as pets despite serious concerns.

The ban is a response to long-standing calls from animal welfare organizations and wildlife experts, intensified by incidents where escaped servals killed domestic cats and ducks.

The proposed change in regulations on exotic cats is a welcome and necessary step, but it addresses just one aspect of a much larger problem.

In Summer 2025 alone, three boa constrictors were found loose in B.C. communities — near Comox, on a Tofino beach, and in the yard of a Burnaby home. Another snake was abandoned in a Sooke park along with a domestic rat in September.

These aren’t isolated incidents. Since 2009, there have been nearly 40 documented cases of exotic pet escapes or releases in B.C., the majority involving reptiles.

Flaws in the current regulation

Exotic animal ownership in B.C. is regulated by the Controlled Alien Species Regulation (CASR), introduced in 2009. While it prohibits the most high-risk animals, such as tigers and venomous snakes, it doesn’t address animal welfare or zoonotic disease risk — two growing areas of concern.

The CASR uses a “negative list” approach, banning certain species (currently more than 1,200), but leaving tens of thousands of reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals unregulated. This approach makes enforcement difficult and inconsistent, especially when frontline officers must correctly identify species and apply complex rules that vary depending on size and type. For instance, vipers and snakes longer than three metres are prohibited, but boa constrictors and pythons under that length are not.

The proposed exotic cat ban is a much-needed first step, but genuine progress requires further action.

Protecting animals

Exotic animals are not domesticated like cats, dogs, or domesticated rabbits. They retain the same instincts and complex needs as their wild counterparts — needs that are extremely difficult to meet in captivity. Servals feel the instinctual need to hunt, parrots to fly, and lizards to bask, dig, and explore.

Even animals marketed as “beginner-friendly” — like crested geckoscorn snakes, and bearded dragons — are rated as difficult or extreme to care for using the EMODE pet score, a science-based, free online tool developed by biologists and veterinarians. When kept in inadequate conditions, these animals suffer physically and psychologically.

Veterinary care adds to the challenge. Exotic animal vets are in short supply, and there have been reports in recent years of some vets ending these services to meet the growing demand for dog and cat care. At the same time, many specialized exotic animal rescues and sanctuaries, as well as larger animal shelters, are overwhelmed and unable to help.

Social media has fueled a rise in exotic pet ownership, but care advice shared online is inconsistent, often inaccurate, and can even be harmful. The gaps leave many new exotic pet owners unprepared, and when they can’t meet their animals’ needs, animals may be surrendered or abandoned.

Protecting ecosystems

Escaped or released exotic pets can become invasive species, posing serious threats to local biodiversity. In B.C., this has already happened. The red-eared slider turtle, introduced through the pet trade and food markets, is now displacing native turtles in local parks.

Red-eared sliders can grow to be 33 centimetres long and can live for more than 25 years in captivity, leading to overwhelmed and unprepared owners abandoning these animals. With more than 50,000 red-eared sliders estimated to be kept as pets in Canada, the problem is far from over.

Species like the American bullfrog have also been introduced to B.C., altering ecosystems and threatening native species.

Protecting public health and safety

Many exotic animals carry zoonotic diseases — those that can jump from animals to humans. Reptiles, amphibians, and small mammals may appear healthy while still shedding bacteria, such as Salmonella.

Public health agencies warn that young children, seniors, pregnant individuals, and those with weakened immune systems should avoid contact with reptiles and other wild animals. Still, exotic pet ownership continues to rise.

In 2024, two Salmonella outbreaks in Canada (one confirmed and one suspected to be gecko-related) led to 61 confirmed cases, including nine hospitalizations and one death. In some cases, people became ill simply by living in a household with geckos.

Seventy-five per cent of emerging infectious diseases originate from animals, primarily from wildlife. The crowded and stressful conditions in which animals are transported create an ideal environment for the emergence and spread of disease.

The global wildlife trade, including the exotic pet trade, has been linked to several major disease outbreaks, such as COVID-19. It is now clear that keeping and trading wild animals increases the risk of future pandemics.

Exotic pets can also pose direct safety risks. Their wild instincts do not disappear in captivity. Bites, scratches, maulings, and constriction injuries are real dangers — even from animals that may appear docile.

How about “positive lists”?

The negative list approach currently used in B.C. is reactive, inconsistent, and difficult to enforce. Instead, a “positive list” framework flips the script: only species that meet science-based criteria for welfare, public safety, and environmental protection can be kept as pets.

Positive lists are already in use in places like Belgium, the Netherlands, New Brunswick, and Saskatchewan. They provide a clear, enforceable approach based on precaution and evidence, not trial and error.

A well-designed positive list would consider factors such as an animal’s ability to thrive in captivity, access to appropriate veterinary care, the risk of zoonotic disease, and ecological impact. Scientific tools, such as the EMODE pet score, could help determine which animals are suitable.

It’s time for stronger protections

The proposed exotic cat ban is a welcome step, but B.C. must take further action. Our current regulations leave too many animals — and too many people — vulnerable to harm. Expanding protections to all exotic species through a positive list framework would provide clarity, consistency, and compassion.

All animals deserve the opportunity to thrive, not just survive in captivity. And British Columbians deserve regulations that protect public health, ecosystems, and communities.

Learn more & take action
Categories
News/Blog

Support a ban on exotic cats & stronger exotic pet rules in B.C. 

Photo: Jo-Anne McArthur / Born Free Foundation / We Animals

Update

This action has ended. Thank you to everyone who sent a message to provincial decision-makers and spoke up for animals. Please stay tuned for updates and go to this page for current campaigns.

  • The B.C. government is proposing new regulations to ban the breeding, sale, and future ownership of all exotic cat species (non-native, wild cats).
  • Public feedback on the ban is being accepted until September 30, 2025
  • While species like lions and tigers are already prohibited, others—such as servals, caracals, leopard cats, and ocelots—are still legal to keep as pets.
  • These wild animals have complex physical and behavioural needs that are nearly impossible to meet in captivity, leading to poor welfare. 
  • While the proposed exotic cat ban is a strong first step, the VHS is calling on the B.C. government to extend the same protections to other exotic species that also suffer in captivity. 

TAKE ACTION: Use the quick action tool below to support the proposed ban and urge the B.C. government to adopt regulations that allow only species proven suitable as pets based on scientific welfare, health, and environmental criteria.

Send a quick message
Learn more

Use the editable template below to send a message to the B.C. Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, or send a message directly to controlledalienspecies@gov.bc.ca.

This action has now ended.

854 people used this tool to support stronger regulations for animals used in mobile live animal programs and exotic animals kept as pets. Thank you for taking action.

See more campaigns

Learn more

The B.C. government’s proposed ban 

In July 2025, B.C.’s Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship announced proposed regulation changes that would ban the breeding, sale and future ownership of all exotic (non-native and non-domestic) cat species. This would include species such as servals, caracals, ocelots, European and African wildcats, Asian golden cats, fishing cats, jungle cats and marbled cats. 

The B.C. government cited welfare, public safety and environmental concerns as motivating factors for the proposed ban.  

Exotic cats in human care have the same natural behaviours and instincts they would in the wild, including the desire to roam, climb and hunt. They suffer compromised health and welfare when owners cannot meet their needs in captivity, and escaped exotic cats pose a threat to the public and other animals. 

What would an exotic cat ban mean?

If approved, all exotic cat species would be added to the list of 1000+ exotic species already prohibited under the “Controlled Alien Species Regulations”. 

The proposed ban would allow current owners to keep their exotic cats for the remainder of the animal’s life, provided they apply for a free permit and meet basic care and safety requirements. However, breeding, selling or acquiring new exotic cat species would no longer be permitted.

The Vancouver Humane Society recommends stronger regulations 

The VHS supports the proposed exotic cat ban and is urging the B.C. government to extend the scope of the ban to consider all exotic species that do not thrive in human care, utilizing a positive list framework that allows only species proven suitable as pets based on welfare, health, and environmental criteria.

Similar to exotic cats, many other exotic species have complex needs and suffer compromised health and welfare when kept as pets; pose a risk to public health and safety; and can threaten native wildlife and habitat when released or escaped.  

The current Controlled Alien Species Regulations (CASR) are based on a lengthy and reactive “negative listing” approach, which lists 1000+ restricted and prohibited species. The current regulations also do not include animal welfare or disease risk as considerations for which animals are prohibited.  

The VHS recommends that the CASR be updated to utilize an evidence-based “positive list” framework. Positive lists are shorter and easier to understand, update and enforce. This framework would outline species allowed to be kept as pets and would be based on welfare, health, safety, and environmental criteria. 

Want to learn more?

Read the VHS’s full submission to the B.C. government (opens as a PDF).

No Title

No Description

Categories
News/Blog

Tell your local leaders: Support stronger exotic pet & mobile animal program rules

Update

This action has ended. Thank you to everyone who sent a message to their local decision-makers and spoke up for animals. Please stay tuned for updates and go to this page for current campaigns.

  • B.C. residents: Please call on your local government to endorse a resolution seeking stronger protections for exotic animals and animals used in mobile programs.
  • The Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM), which serves as the voice for local governments across B.C., will be meeting for their annual convention Sept 22-26 in Victoria.
  • UBCM members will consider a resolution calling on the B.C. government to regulate mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) and update regulations relating to exotic (non-native, undomesticated) species.
  • The UBCM resolution (pg. 173 of Resolutions Book) was put forward by Port Moody Council following a Port Moody decision earlier this year to prohibit MLAPs, such as mobile petting zoos.
  • Port Moody’s decision was a result of animal welfare, environmental, public health and safety, and educational concerns associated with MLAPs. 

TAKE ACTION: Use the quick message tool below to urge your local government to endorse the UBCM resolution seeking stronger protections for animals transported for public display, handling, or sale and for updated regulations related to the import, keeping, breeding, and transport of all exotic species.

Send a quick message
Learn more

The resolution seeks to:

  1. Regulate mobile live animal programs (MLAPs), which can “create distress for animals and introduce risks of zoonotic disease transmission and injury for people and other animals” as they transport animals for public display, handling, or sale.
  2. Update the Province’s Controlled Alien Species Regulations to equally prioritize animal welfare considerations alongside public safety, and prohibit the import, keeping, breeding and transport of exotic species.

Use the template message to ask your local leaders to back the UBCM resolution.

This action has now ended.

1,327 people used this tool to support stronger regulations for animals used in mobile live animal programs and exotic animals kept as pets. Thank you for taking action.

See more campaigns

Learn more

What are mobile live animal programs? 

Mobile live animal programs (MLAPs) can take many forms, including travelling petting zoos, presentations, and expos. They involve the transport of animals to a location for display, public entertainment, or sale to the public, and feature a variety of different animals. MLAPs often include exotic animals (wild animals not native to B.C.), such as spiders, snakes, lizards, and tortoises.  

Concerns regarding MLAPs include: 

  • Frequent, and at times long-distance, transport of animals to events; 
  • Small, barren enclosures with little to no opportunity for natural behaviours or the ability to escape the view of the public and other animals; 
  • Frequent public handling, increasing risk of injury and disease spread; 
  • Lack of educational value and the risk of perpetuating misconceptions about animal care and needs. 

What are the issues with keeping exotic animals as pets? 

  • Animal welfare: Exotic animals (wild animals not native to B.C.), even if they are born in captivity, still have the same complex needs they would in the wild. It’s extremely difficult to recreate their natural environment in captivity, and when those needs aren’t met, the animals often suffer. 
  • Public health & safety concerns: Approximately 75% of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic, meaning they can spread from animals to humans. In the last decade, there have been seven documented disease outbreaks in B.C. linked to the exotic pet trade, four of which occurred in 2023 and 2024 and were associated with snakes, lizards, and geckos. 
  • Ecological threats: Escaped or released pets can become invasive species, displacing native wildlife, threatening habitats, and spreading new diseases. 
  • Community impacts: Escaped or released animals and the surrender of unwanted exotic pets strain already overwhelmed shelters, rescues, and veterinary services. There have been many documented instances of escaped/released exotic pets in B.C. in recent years. 
Read or listen